Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt-r 40km/h Over. Need Your Help!


Recommended Posts

hehe this last page has made me giggle.

Interesting end to all of it.

I've lost my license before & by the same token beaten many many fanciful charges as well. If you've got the way/will to beat it, or use the law to your advantage. Power be to you for doing it. Sometimes the cost is not the issue, it's the principle of the situation.

If more people stood up to the absurd laws, contested their fines then the court system would become clogged and something would be done about the ridiculous revenue raising which is the driving force behind all camera operations. It's got nothing to do with safety at all.

  On 16/05/2011 at 9:54 AM, miguelegant said:

That's when you say that you were under instruction of a police officer and therefore he can't do anything about it.

Yea I was going to fight, but lawyer f**ked up and it'd be another 3 months, so just decided to bite the bullet. We *might* have won, especially because it was only a small distance and low speed. *But* if the judge was in a bad mood he would rule against me.

Just so everyone knows, even given police instructions you *CANNOT* break the law.

  On 17/05/2011 at 1:20 AM, Misanthrope R35 said:

I think some people really have no idea how scarily EASY it is to hit 40k over speed limit in *any* skyline.

Fixed. :P

  On 17/05/2011 at 9:50 AM, R31Nismoid said:

hehe this last page has made me giggle.

Interesting end to all of it.

I've lost my license before & by the same token beaten many many fanciful charges as well. If you've got the way/will to beat it, or use the law to your advantage. Power be to you for doing it. Sometimes the cost is not the issue, it's the principle of the situation.

If more people stood up to the absurd laws, contested their fines then the court system would become clogged and something would be done about the ridiculous revenue raising which is the driving force behind all camera operations. It's got nothing to do with safety at all.

Exactly.

Just because the government says it's right, doesn't make it so.

It's our duty, as an engaged memebr of society, to question and challenge our government at every turn.

Become complacent and before you know it you'll be working for your government, rather than your government working for you (as has already happened).

lol one court case @ a time.

I'm off to court soon over a parking fine. Dirty parking inspectors - I even got picture evidence of them giving out the false ticket.

Fkbags just assume most people roll over and pay - FK THAT!

  On 20/05/2011 at 1:06 PM, R31Nismoid said:

lol one court case @ a time.

I'm off to court soon over a parking fine. Dirty parking inspectors - I even got picture evidence of them giving out the false ticket.

Fkbags just assume most people roll over and pay - FK THAT!

details?

Said i was parked in non-standing zone, I wasn't. It'll be open/shut as i took pics of the car, the sign - where it was parked.

The works.

I could have sent a letter initially but fk it, clog the court system is my belief. Wont cost me money as ill move my shift so i can attend.

I used to park in one carpark spot all the time at Penrith - a parking bay on a curved laneway.

It was because the parking sign could not be placed on the apex to include that bay as "ONE HOUR PARKING". And the arrow could only start from the bay next to mine.

One day I caught a Ranger who was going to book me. I pointed out to him that the arrow and the sign could only refer to the bay next to mine and hence further down the line.

He walked away.

Two days later, I looked up at the sign, and a touch up job in similar green paint had been used to make the arrow point both ways.

Revenge is alive and well.

I swear: one day, I'll take a step ladder up to that sign and repaint ie. WHITE-OUT that section of arrow

  On 20/05/2011 at 2:31 PM, Terry_GT-R34 said:

He walked away.

Two days later, I looked up at the sign, and a touch up job in similar green paint had been used to make the arrow point both ways.

Revenge is alive and well.

I swear: one day, I'll take a step ladder up to that sign and repaint ie. WHITE-OUT that section of arrow

I'd park there, and when I got a fine; take photo's of the clearly vandalised sign, and present that as evidence.

Rude B'stards!

If you have never done 40k over the limit then feel free to have a go at the op

other wise stfu

Its easy to get 20 k over in my wifes 1.6 auto laser let alone a Japanese super car

  On 21/05/2011 at 12:09 AM, defari said:

No it's not, I had a laser 0-100 in 22 seconds

My Nissan Nomad van full of band PA gear is faster than that.....What was wrong with it?

  Quote
Man there are some righteous wankers in here, holier than thou much guys?

+ 1

he could have easily just done a stat dec but manned up and took it to court.

bigger balls than most.

Edited by hamiltonau

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The prices I’ve heard aren’t that bad 
    • Oh, I also meant to say that it is possible to use a venting BOV and restrict its outlet down so that it does vent enough to prevent the sututu, but vents slowly enough that the AFM doesn't see all the air at once and makes it easier to avoid stalling.
    • I'll go talk to my bank manager. Either that or my nearest western Sydney drug baron.
    • Driveability will be about the same with either externally venting BOV, or no BOV at all. Perhaps worse one way than the other, with me thinking that the definitely more flow going through the AFM through a venting BOV more likely to cause rich stalls than the perhaps more flow that the AFM might read on reversion. There is no such thing as "turbo damage" from not having a BOV at stock, or even quite a lot higher than stock, power levels. You need a big turbo with a lot of mass spinning hard getting a horrible slowdown from a slammed shut throttle before there is anything like the shaft loads required to damage things. Not an issue on small turbos. The ONLY 2 reasons that Nissan put a recirc valve onto the RB were: It is a bypass valve. It is open when under vacuum. When not on boost, it bypasses intake air forward around the compressor, which unloads the compressor, allowing the turbine to sping more freely, making the whole lot a bit more efficient when just puddling around. Throttle response should also be faster via the shorter, smaller diameter BOV pipe (when in NA, ie before the BOV closes and boost is building) which is nicer for driveability. Emissions. The reversion causes CO pulses. Eliminate the reversion (or at least, keep it away from the AFM) and you don't get that. The stalling/driveability aspect could have been tuned around, as shown one example of by dose above, if Nissan hadn't put a recirc valve on. Many many turbo engines before the RB had no BOV. They did not stall. See the RB30 turbo as an example. Nistune is definitely better than just stock ECU. It allows you to access and change things that are not excellent on the stock setup, and allows you to do mods like put decent injectors in, relocate the AFM, put a bigger turbo or even cams, etc, on, change to coil swith completely different swell needs, etc etc. All the things that you might need or want to do 25 years after the car was new. Aftermarket replacement ECU is obviously better again, because it gives you even more freedom from the constraints of the stock ECU. I won't be needing to go any further than Nistune though, for the new turbo in the 250ish rwkW region I'm going to, with big injectors, and most other things being stockish.
    • Lucky the prp block is supposed to be released next weekend 
×
×
  • Create New...