Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wow... I've been considering upgrading to the 7163 based on some of the info found online.

But as it now may even be more responsive in variable twin scroll, it looks like I'll be waiting for some results of this new turbo.

This isn't really new technology, as it's very similar in concept to a quick spool valve...

http://www.enginebasics.com/Advanced%20Engine%20Tuning/Quick%20Spool%20Valve%20Test.html

But being incorporated into the housing it should be an improvement on the quick spool valve due to less turbulence in the exhaust flow.

Hopefully it's released soon so we can see some data.

updated dynojet result from our R34 GTR with Twin EFR6258 0.64 a/r 2.6L RB26:

nissan-rb26dett-efr-twin-turbo-kit-1-con

Hi Geoff,

I definitely prefer the single over the double so most likely will get the 8374/0.92 IWG. Like the simplicity.

1 question Geoff, do you do a downpipe for that turbo to go to a standard position Cat ( r33 gtr) obviously using your manifold.

Do all my own installations at home but not so good at making downpipes. that would be cool if that is possible.

Cheers Mike

Hi Mike, yes its no problem to supply the downpipe for our single turbo RB setups. we have a dedicated GTR front cut specifically for test fits and mockups like this. email me directly [email protected] and I can help get this sorted for you

Can you provide a v-band EFR turbo already modded to T3? Which in your opinion is a better replacement for the HKS GT-RS, the 6758 or the 7163? I don't want a less responsive turbo, but the 6758 doesn't look like that much more power than the GT-RS.

Hi Ryno, yes we can convert the vband EFR turbo to a T3 inlet. This is a special order only but we can do it. here is a photo:

post-28839-0-74141100-1381890513.jpg

Hi Geoff, Have you had any results with the EFR 9174 hybrids? i've read the spool performance is only 50-100rpm down on a 8374 but your compressor efficiency moves up the revs a fair bit.

hi, the EFR9174 is an interesting turbo. BorgWarner has just released this 9174 combination for 2016 and is the only large B2 Frame EFR with the lightweight alloy bearing housing. It spools very well (similar to 8374) and has great topend (close to 9180). It is also capable of 125k rpm shaft speed (whereas 9180 is only 116k rpm). We have these in stock now, very good turbocharger when the engine can gobble up the airflow. I am planning to put this on my RB26 next

word on the street is that borg warner have started making these turbos with investment cast housings again

correct, been that way about 14 months now

lastly, our year-end blowout sale is going on now until Dec 31. anyone looking to pick up a manifold or kit at a discount this is a great time to do so!

926727_964444436971793_103546214_n.jpg

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

Geoff, do you have any idea when the variable twin scroll will hit the streets?

And what housings it will be available in?

If there would be EFR variable twin scroll turbo on a RB26 that would be something crazy! may be 800hp with stock spool!

Geoff, do you have any idea when the variable twin scroll will hit the streets?

And what housings it will be available in?

The A/R selected for these initial prototypes was a direct match to the existing housings - for the B1 frame 7163 it is 0.80 a/r and for the B2 frame it is 0.92 a/r. This housing design is very much in it's infancy of the development process. Based on a combination of testing and other competing technologies it's unlikely to hit the streets anytime soon. Beyond that - actually fitting this turbo to any engine is serious work. Completely new manifold and downpipe design required from any other existing turbo or any other EFR

If there would be EFR variable twin scroll turbo on a RB26 that would be something crazy! may be 800hp with stock spool!

the 6258 twins with 0.64 a/r and a stiff actuator are not far off from stock spool and can make >800hp

No doubt the twin 6258 spools well for an 800 hp set up, but if youre comparing it to the dog shit 100% stock car that is lazy below 4k rpm its sort of unfair.

An rb26 that has stock turbos can build 5psi no prob at 2k rpm when basic mods are done. Mine would toot around in 5th grear with 255/35/18's at 60kph. 6258 are atleast 100hp each more and with runners that are not optimal for low power/rpm/boost tootleing around. No way would it have factory type drivability which is of concern for most who like in a major metro city in australia which does not have the open type roads America has.

  • 3 weeks later...

So what kind of EGT are you guys getting on your EFRs?

Trying to find out what would be acceptable in the long run.

But so far no "precise" values to be found?

Reason I'm asking is, my PTP turbo blanket is pretty much done after only ~5000km (may be ~100km on track/hard driving).

Where is that taken from, Geoff?

A sensor in the collector?

That'd be logical, max heat is max you want into the turbo, so thats measuring it as close as the turbo inlet as possible. Not sure how much the temp would drop through the runners, but i doubt it'd be much so perhaps wouldn't matter much where you measured it?

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Geoff,

Loving the sound of these turbos.

Just a quick query on what you would recommend for my build.

nitto RB32/26 currently running -5's on E85. Making 580hp, full boost under 4.3k or something.

Would love to be making 750hp whilst maintaining a similar level of response if possible. More than happy to make the switch to single if need be.

Thanks in advance!

Hi Geoff,

Loving the sound of these turbos.

Just a quick query on what you would recommend for my build.

nitto RB32/26 currently running -5's on E85. Making 580hp, full boost under 4.3k or something.

Would love to be making 750hp whilst maintaining a similar level of response if possible. More than happy to make the switch to single if need be.

Thanks in advance!

Noctis - when a tall RB30 block is used, I suggest twin EFR6758 (or twin EFR7163 depending on fuel and boost target). The twin EFR setups are not for everyone - there is more piping/lines/two turbos ... twin EFRs fit better than a large single in these cars - and for a responsive 750hp there is nothing that can touch this. We make the downpipes and charge pipe so this is a bolton affair to replace the existing -5s

nissan-rb26dett-efr-twin-turbo-kit-1-con

Edited by Full-Race Geoff
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2001 BE5D Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (3rd gen) EJ208 (pink injector) Twin Turbo 280PS 5-speed manual Full time 4WD "RSK" grade which means all of the above LQC option which means stock rear spoiler  I got it primarily to export to someone outside Japan who was interested. These BE5 Legacy B4 RSKs are going through a bit of a resurgence right know in Japan as they are one of the few cars from the "turbo, manual, RWD/4WD, 280hp gentleman's agreement era" cars that don't require stupid money to purchase. Which for some people might be a good opportunity to get as a base for restoration. If I can't find anyone to purchase it I will certainly be doing that myself over the long term. Why? Because it's properly fast in stock form, handles well enough for a GT sedan, there's still enough aftermarket and (if you can wait a while) genuine part support to make it a restoration candidate (<-- that will only get worse over time so it's a case of do it now or choose get a BL5 4th Gen). Mechanically it's fine, has only 89,200kms on the odometer. The problem with this car is that the body and exterior trims are weathered from at least the last 10 years being parked outdoors. I'm the 3rd owner, the first owner was the one that had it for 14 years and barely drove it, had a low-speed front impact (which didn't damage anything behind the radiator support) and got it fixed and sold it. The 2nd owner put most of the kms on it and parked it outside for the last 10 years, hence the door rubbers have seen better days but if you overlook those cosmetic details, it presents pretty nicely. There is some minor rust on the LH rear wheel arch which I'll have looked at too at some stage.  Also as you'd expect from a car this age, the clear top coat is gone, leaving a satin finish on the roof.  Mechanically it's fine (as you would expect from a car with less than 100K kms) but the steering does feel slightly vague around the centre position at higher speeds. So first on the list is to get the steering rack bushes looked at. There's also the Lock button on the remote which doesn't work, but the Open button does.... it means that the anti-theft system thinks it's always open? It seems like if you open the car and don't start the engine within 3 mins or so the anti-theft kicks in again without any beeps or signals. So if you got to start it after that, it won't. You have to push the open button again. That's how I understand it anyway. Just a small irritation but not a big problem to sort out. There's only one mod, the Wangan SPL muffler. Just a tad louder than stock. It's a really good mod for those who don't want to wake the neighbours but still want to hear a more prominent unequal length header EJ20 sound. Anyway I hope to get all those things done eventually, that is unless someone wanted to import it to their country from Japan (where I live). I'm open for negotiations as I really would like a Skyline... but this will definitely suffice in the meantime 🙂 *Disclaimer: This is how I picked it up from the dealer, minus the stuff on the back seat. I haven't cleaned the engine bay or done a thorough exterior clean, aside from spray painting the wipers. 
    • Wow, even with the Audi logo centre caps. I love OEM wheel mismatches. 
    • Welcome!  Can't go wrong with a Stag.
    • Looks good. Nice height.
    • Hey all, a little help from the Stagea hive mind plz.. I'm days away from buying either a 2002 Stagea 250tRS AR-X Four, premium leather, power seats and all the old switches etc that go with it, or a 2002 Stagea 250tRS VR-X Four AERO, pov pack, cloth seats etc, with coil overs, sports zorst, comes with original zorst and suspension and parts. (I think I've got the models right?) Both are VQ25DET, have 160000kms, both straight no rust both with $2000+ in recent servicing receipts, both ride on aftermarket 18" rims. The Aero has a replaced turbo as well. I like the cool factor of the Aero car but the AR-X has never been modified. Neither have been driven hardly at all in the last 5 years. Any thoughts on which one or does it come down to personal preference? davemoto 
×
×
  • Create New...