Jump to content
SAU Community

Garrett Medium Frame Gtx Turbos

SimonR32

By SimonR32,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

whatsisname
whatsisname

Polished up pretty good if I do say so myself [emoji4]

FineLine
FineLine

Who gives a toss how it looks if it meets the performace criteria. I hope they wax garretts arse to the point where garrett actually starts doing some real r&d and giving customers something bette

whatsisname
whatsisname

The GTX3584RS will support roughly 850-880HP on a 3.0L (maximum rpm of ~7500-8000) at a PR of about 3.1-3.3 No chance of getting 1000HP out of it, not unless it can be done at a PR of 2.75 and even th

Posted Images

juggernaut1 Proficient

juggernaut1

Posted
Posted (edited)

i think the gtx would really benefit from more boost in that example, they're compressor map does suggest the biggest difference is at high boost levels

Problem is the turbine and exhaust housing are likely to be choking the compressors true potential - basically its a GT35 flowing compressor being turned (and choked) by a GT30 turbine.

E85 and/or larger ex housing would be the answer IMO.

Now I wonder what the GTX35 would be like in my turbo falcon with 1.06 ex hsg.:mellow:

Edited by juggernaut1
Lithium Grand Master

Lithium

Posted
Posted

which comes back to the possibility of a gtx3576 being a good thing if you can afford to make one.

How?? The turbo builds boost slower than one with the 82mm GT series compressor.

ShiftyTys Rising Star

ShiftyTys

Posted
Posted

gtx3076r with the skyline .73 AR exhaust housing (avoturbo.com) might be very interesting.....

currently using this housing with gt3076r bb core, lag in awd auto stagea until just over 2000rpm then it takes off! easy 250awkw with 450cc S15 injectors

better than stock automatic torque converter would change this again tho....

throw in 550cc injectors and the gtx3076r turbo and there's an easy 300awkw on pump gas with remap

Getting that setup installed at Avo on my 33gtst in next couple weeks :)

WIHAGTR Community Regular

WIHAGTR

Posted
Posted

Okay... I'm chasing around 300kw... no more since it's a standard rb25... a 3076 would EASILY get that but it would be capable of more and will have more lag than a 3071... so I'm going with the 3071.

But I'm torn between housing types... .62 or .82...

Also to add: I'm running vapor gas injection so I get around 20kw more than petrol.

With .82 I'll have more power but more lag, however would that power be too much more for my engine to progressively handle? Would it exceed 300?

With .62 can I expect 280-300kw? If that's the case then It would be fast spool and thus best choice for a standard rb25?

Since it's going to be larger than the gt version, wouldn't a .62 mean more heat and thus mean less boost to avoid issues?

NYTSKY Grand Master

NYTSKY

Posted
Posted

i think the gtx would really benefit from more boost in that example, they're compressor map does suggest the biggest difference is at high boost levels

If someone wants to buy the front/cartridge of my GT35 ill get a GTX35 to test :)

scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted

Okay... I'm chasing around 300kw... no more since it's a standard rb25... a 3076 would EASILY get that but it would be capable of more and will have more lag than a 3071... so I'm going with the 3071.

But I'm torn between housing types... .62 or .82...

Also to add: I'm running vapor gas injection so I get around 20kw more than petrol.

With .82 I'll have more power but more lag, however would that power be too much more for my engine to progressively handle? Would it exceed 300?

With .62 can I expect 280-300kw? If that's the case then It would be fast spool and thus best choice for a standard rb25?

Since it's going to be larger than the gt version, wouldn't a .62 mean more heat and thus mean less boost to avoid issues?

Where do you want the efficiency to lie? I prefer midrange so a smaller housing suits me, those chasing top end will go for the .82 or 1ar housings.

As you have a cold gas cooling the charge you may not notice a bit of extra heat...

Rolls Grand Master

Rolls

Posted
Posted
With .62 can I expect 280-300kw? If that's the case then It would be fast spool and thus best choice for a standard rb25?

Since it's going to be larger than the gt version, wouldn't a .62 mean more heat and thus mean less boost to avoid issues?

If you want to lean on it more the smaller rear housing should make up to 300kw on decent boost.

Personally I think you should always go the smallest housing/turbo that will make your power goals and be close to maxing it out, you'll get slightly more intake heat but response is key for a street car.

skylinecouple Experienced

skylinecouple

Posted
Posted (edited)

Okay... I'm chasing around 300kw... no more since it's a standard rb25... a 3076 would EASILY get that but it would be capable of more and will have more lag than a 3071... so I'm going with the 3071.

But I'm torn between housing types... .62 or .82...

Also to add: I'm running vapor gas injection so I get around 20kw more than petrol.

With .82 I'll have more power but more lag, however would that power be too much more for my engine to progressively handle? Would it exceed 300?

With .62 can I expect 280-300kw? If that's the case then It would be fast spool and thus best choice for a standard rb25?

Since it's going to be larger than the gt version, wouldn't a .62 mean more heat and thus mean less boost to avoid issues?

Do not go with the .63, I have the 3071 with .82 and trust me, there IS no lag. If you go with the smaller housing it will simply come on boost too early and wheel spin. Most of the guys with 3076 & .82 are very happy with the way they perform as far as response is concerned. So why go with an exhaust housing that will choke the power and cause turbine and therefore exhaust heat. The result from this is detonation so you will have to remove timing which will reduce power anyway. The 3071 is the best compromise for no lag/good power. Personally, go with the 3076/.82 and know there is some headroom for more power but if boost is kept low so will inlet temperatures.

I think cams will be needed to hit 300rwks with a 3071/.82 regardless of the latest technology.

Edited by skylinecouple
WIHAGTR Community Regular

WIHAGTR

Posted
Posted

Hm so far from people I know and I net hunting it appears .82 is the go. 3076 I would rather avoid since a gt makes 280kw on rb25, you'd assume the gtx would be near 300, meaning 320 kw for me since I'm on gas. the gt 3071 can't take more than 260 so assume the gtx version might push 280 which means 300 for my gas. so 3071 is the choice but housing is still the issue. .82 looks like the option that has the least hesitation and in reality it's a few nanoseconds of time I best not need to worry about.

I think I've made my choice, 3071 with .82

thanks guys! love these forums! like consulting with one massive car nerd :)

ShiftyTys Rising Star

ShiftyTys

Posted
Posted

Do not go with the .63, I have the 3071 with .82 and trust me, there IS no lag. If you go with the smaller housing it will simply come on boost too early and wheel spin. Most of the guys with 3076 & .82 are very happy with the way they perform as far as response is concerned. So why go with an exhaust housing that will choke the power and cause turbine and therefore exhaust heat. The result from this is detonation so you will have to remove timing which will reduce power anyway. The 3071 is the best compromise for no lag/good power. Personally, go with the 3076/.82 and know there is some headroom for more power but if boost is kept low so will inlet temperatures.

I think cams will be needed to hit 300rwks with a 3071/.82 regardless of the latest technology.

So wouldn't something like a gtx3076.73 be ideal?

Thoughts anyone?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • sunsetR33
      Replacing turbo water line - any recommendations or advice?

      By sunsetR33 · Posted

      One thing I can tell you is, do it properly the first time. If you encounter unexpected problems just let the car sit for a week or two if you have to get some other parts or figure stuff out.  I'd have said go and use as many OEM parts as possible but since you want to change the turbo later on a custom kit is probably the better choice. Since I have no experience with RB25 just compare parts diagrams and images before buying a line kit and it should be easy to see if it has everything you need. Amayama has very good parts diagrams and part number lists, that is what I used a bunch to figure out what I might need. And don't forget to plan ahead and possibly renew other stuff that's easy to get to while you're in there doing the turbo lines. Happy wrenching
    • sunsetR33
      Unpeeling the Orange

      By sunsetR33 · Posted

      Update 4:   Hi all, good news. Engine is running and all the gaskets and seals seem to be working as intended. No leaks so far, even the JB Weld seems to hold. I flushed out the old coolant a few times and put in fresh coolant, not Nissan stuff, I decided to try the Ravenol Protect FL22, they claim it works for a wide variety of JDM cars and the opinions on it by some people were pretty good. And it has the nice poison green color! And man am I glad I bought a coolant system tester earlier this year, vacuum filling works wonders on this engine. I can definitely recommend this to anyone still doing it the old school way. All you need is compressed air supply. Will have to do a small test drive as soon as I can, I removed the gauge cluster again as the tacho needle was still bouncing around a bit but it was much better than before already.  I also found some cracks on all 4 tires inner and outer sidewalls. Apparently these tires should 't be parked on for extended periods or be kept under 0 degrees during storage, which I did not know. Clearly the previous owner didn't look into those details either, he probably bought them just cause they are cool semi-slicks. I'm just wondering how tf I am supposed to reach 30-80 degree tire temperatures on the public road consistenly, these tires were never going to work for my use case. I'll probably order Continental SportContact7 ones as these are the best allround summer tire available right now and I don't think I'll need anything crazier for now. Do let me know if you have experience with various tires and which ones you recommend.
    • sunsetR33
      Unpeeling the Orange

      By sunsetR33 · Posted

      You have no idea how many goddamn boxes I received these past three months haha Most have been put to use by now though, luckily
    • sunsetR33
      Unpeeling the Orange

      By sunsetR33 · Posted

      Not going to pretend I didn't do a bit of junky work this time around, but mostly due to the fact that some things I am not willing to spend days fixing right now, like wiring. I try to do most things properly the first time around.
    • sunsetR33
      Unpeeling the Orange

      By sunsetR33 · Posted

      Regardless of neglect or incompetence, fixing either is tedious and annoying. Most of the neglect on my car is definitely rust. I hope I can at least pass inspections later on and they won't fail the car due to slightly corroded hardlines. I was generous with rust converter and wax and it looks ok, most lines in the rear are hard to see properly anyways.  Definitely will test them though to make sure they don't rupture under pressure, in that case the car isn't going anywhere this year.
×
×
  • Create New...