Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah, seriously - 4"... do you realise how much of a mad combination you've got here? :worship: I'd probably have gone for slightly larger cams, but regardless - this thing is going to have such an insane amount of power everywhere it makes me fizz.

Same power for slightly less boost. (As im intentiinaly limiting it) This boost chart show Max boost like 4k. He recons more preload will / better tune will knock a bit off that. Made 293 rwkw.

So it was run up on Trents dyno and then Trent made 20 more? or is this 20 more between the 2 dynos? If in the short time Trent had it he was able to make 20 more kw then its certainly got some left in it

Not bagging out Trent but dynos are tuning tools and should not be used for comparisons.

So it was run up on Trents dyno and then Trent made 20 more? or is this 20 more between the 2 dynos? If in the short time Trent had it he was able to make 20 more kw then its certainly got some left in it

Not bagging out Trent but dynos are tuning tools and should not be used for comparisons.

Lol. Dyno are not meant for camparison. Every dyno is different. That 20 is just the difference in dyno. The boost v rpm is alot more accurate to what I feel with my foot to be honest. Very close to my own in car findings.

To those who want to see the real response etc do we want to get the donations started for a tune through Trent if i cant get avo to sort it? I can't afford it after the thousands I dropped for this install.

So it was run up on Trents dyno and then Trent made 20 more? or is this 20 more between the 2 dynos? If in the short time Trent had it he was able to make 20 more kw then its certainly got some left in it

Not bagging out Trent but dynos are tuning tools and should not be used for comparisons.

unfortunately many dyno plots leave a lot to be desired and tend to give you a rounded / smoothed result.... nothing like the actual curve. In this case the the original dyno only had a few plots (often between 10-20 points of reference over whole graph which is very coarse) which were then interpolated to make a pretty average curve.

We were able to give an accurate graph with far more refference plots (plots every 50 rpm on average) based actual time in that particular gear same as it would see on the road, this graph far closer represented the on road feel.

We did not touch the car tune wise at all, i dont think its fair on the other shop, im sure they will rectify it without fuss.

Luckily we are able to extract far more accurate results with the dynapck but we had to pay a premium for it $$$ wise when we first purchased the dyno, as for the power difference it is very common to see around 20rwkw difference from that particular dyno to mine, it is a genuinely low reading dyno compared to the various others in the area.

I know most dynos will read different but we are lucky enough to have at least five or 6 around that read within a very small margin which allows for quick easy comparisons. i even had the opportunity to directly compare a car from HPF on friday and the difference @310rwkw was 3 kw.... but our curve was much more detailed and showed up alot of detail not show on the other dyno plot... not bad tune detail but actual engine characteristics dulled out by roller inertia.

Dyno are tools and as long as you extract the relevant data your chasing in the most detail then the actual number is irrelevant and in this particular case a few simple runs showed exactly what needs rectifying.

Lol. Dyno are not meant for camparison. Every dyno is different. That 20 is just the difference in dyno. The boost v rpm is alot more accurate to what I feel with my foot to be honest. Very close to my own in car findings.

My point exactly. Way to many variables that could affect the power output. I dont know why AVO ran it in 3rd gear as it should have been run in fourth but that normally wont make much difference to the kw reading.

Send it down the drag strip now and see what mph you can run with it then get it retuned/sorted out and re run it again. Thats the best comparison.

Our car use to make 460rwkw but only managed to run 128mph on one or two occasions, mid to low 120's were pretty normal for it.... now it makes about 40rwkw less but runs into the mid 130's on a regular basis. Dyno's figures and peak power dont mean shit really :P

unfortunately many dyno plots leave a lot to be desired and tend to give you a rounded / smoothed result.... nothing like the actual curve. In this case the the original dyno only had a few plots (often between 10-20 points of reference over whole graph which is very coarse) which were then interpolated to make a pretty average curve.

We were able to give an accurate graph with far more refference plots (plots every 50 rpm on average) based actual time in that particular gear same as it would see on the road, this graph far closer represented the on road feel.

We did not touch the car tune wise at all, i dont think its fair on the other shop, im sure they will rectify it without fuss.

Luckily we are able to extract far more accurate results with the dynapck but we had to pay a premium for it $$$ wise when we first purchased the dyno, as for the power difference it is very common to see around 20rwkw difference from that particular dyno to mine, it is a genuinely low reading dyno compared to the various others in the area.

I know most dynos will read different but we are lucky enough to have at least five or 6 around that read within a very small margin which allows for quick easy comparisons. i even had the opportunity to directly compare a car from HPF on friday and the difference @310rwkw was 3 kw.... but our curve was much more detailed and showed up alot of detail not show on the other dyno plot... not bad tune detail but actual engine characteristics dulled out by roller inertia.

Dyno are tools and as long as you extract the relevant data your chasing in the most detail then the actual number is irrelevant and in this particular case a few simple runs showed exactly what needs rectifying.

I don't think anyone here was expecting there to be much wrong with the final power number. It looked a bit lazy coming on boost to most of us and that implied that there was more that could be done in the set up. Hopefully AVO can fine tune the potential issues you found and get Shifty the best result from his new turbo.

Yeah, seriously - 4"... do you realise how much of a mad combination you've got here? :worship: I'd probably have gone for slightly larger cams, but regardless - this thing is going to have such an insane amount of power everywhere it makes me fizz.

4 inch will be the go then! soon as i have some progress will let you all know

There would be some good gains in the gate preload, i would nearly double it and that should see around 20rwkw @ 4000rpm alone, increasing the map resolution from 120kpa to 180-220kpa will stop it "flat-lining" give more control in the fuelling map. And finally setting the Vct.

Sounds like what we expected for the most part.

Not enough time/effort was put in initially. Thanks for clearing it up :)

Not surprised that there is a bit more response left in the setup, looked far too laggy/unresponsive compared to what seems to be floating around in the GT35R range

Trent - There is a huge difference in a dyno that is setup right versus a dyno that is just set up. It also means a huge difference between brands of dyno as well. We used a DD where i worked and it was pretty decent. But, i no longer work there and another shop looks after our tuning duties now and their operator knows a lot more about the setup and back end so they can work with theirs a lot more effectively. Its all knowledge as Tyson is going to find out with his car it would seem.

It sounds to me that AVO just arent up to speed with what needs to be done. Thats not to knock them, some workshops just arent that way inclined with certain cars, nor are they prepared to take the time to carry out the R&D, but i guess you need to give them a chance before you go elsewhere.

I know the feeling though as i toiled with a high RPM miss fire for quite a while. After re wiring a few things and purchasing a brand new CAS the problem still wasnt fixed. Unigroup tried tuning the car but straight away said it has the dredded incorrect RPM signal being sent to the ECU at around 8000+rpm.

The new Harmonic balancer with triggers that Ross Balancers now market was designed on our car. It works a treat and it sorted it all out instantly. It now revs to 9000+rpm very cleanly. Pretty disppointed thats all it was but I just didnt know how to fix it :( Not everyone knows everything....

Edited by ido09s

My point exactly. Way to many variables that could affect the power output. I dont know why AVO ran it in 3rd gear as it should have been run in fourth but that normally wont make much difference to the kw reading.

Send it down the drag strip now and see what mph you can run with it then get it retuned/sorted out and re run it again. Thats the best comparison.

Our car use to make 460rwkw but only managed to run 128mph on one or two occasions, mid to low 120's were pretty normal for it.... now it makes about 40rwkw less but runs into the mid 130's on a regular basis. Dyno's figures and peak power dont mean shit really :P

we are not interested in the peak, its all the important stuff we were asked to look at.... ie low mid and transitional.

Trent - There is a huge difference in a dyno that is setup right versus a dyno that is just set up. It also means a huge difference between brands of dyno as well. We used a DD where i worked and it was pretty decent. But, i no longer work there and another shop looks after our tuning duties now and their operator knows a lot more about the setup and back end so they can work with theirs a lot more effectively. Its all knowledge as Tyson is going to find out with his car it would seem.

Yeah i understand, i used DD most of the time prior to opening up, i ended up with the dynapck after a really long decision process and after using the other offerings... it was not a plain sailing though as family friends own DTS dynos and unfortunately it did not meet my requirements and they no longer talk to us.. my biggest concern with the dynapck was the "perceived" setup time... i was always told by the DD guys it tok to long to setup but to be honest it takes less time than strapping a car down so luckily it was a moot point.

i reckon if i was offered to swap my 2wd for a new 4wd dyno for FREE, i would decline.. i would rather pay for the dynapack upgrade.

Trent - There is a huge difference in a dyno that is setup right versus a dyno that is just set up. It also means a huge difference between brands of dyno as well. We used a DD where i worked and it was pretty decent. But, i no longer work there and another shop looks after our tuning duties now and their operator knows a lot more about the setup and back end so they can work with theirs a lot more effectively. Its all knowledge as Tyson is going to find out with his car it would seem.

Yeah i understand, i used DD most of the time prior to opening up, i ended up with the dynapck after a really long decision process and after using the other offerings... it was not a plain sailing though as family friends own DTS dynos and unfortunately it did not meet my requirements and they no longer talk to us.. my biggest concern with the dynapck was the "perceived" setup time... i was always told by the DD guys it tok to long to setup but to be honest it takes less time than strapping a car down so luckily it was a moot point.

i reckon if i was offered to swap my 2wd for a new 4wd dyno for FREE, i would decline.. i would rather pay for the dynapack upgrade.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
    • Yea - I mean I've seen my fuel pump which is decades old and uh, while I'm not saying this with real knowledge... but I sure get the ick at using anything in the fuel system that produced the state of that pump. Many years ago I went through multiple pumps (and strainers) before I dropped the tank to clean it out with extreme violence. I'm talking the car would do maybe 50km before coming to a halt, which resulted in me cleaning out the filter with some brake cleaner and going on my way. None of my stuff ever looked like what came out of your fuel tank. I don't think I'd be happy with it unless every single component was replaced (or at least checked/cleaned/confirmed to be clean here).
    • I'm not going to recommend an EBC pad. I don't like them. Just about anything else would suit me better. I've been using Intima pads for a while now.
×
×
  • Create New...