Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Once he'd committed to the gap there wasn't much he could do, Senna had 2 wheels off the track trying to avoid the contact, which combined with getting air on the ripple strip made lose steering. All I've been saying is that, in my opinion, that's a more justified racing incident than what schumacher did, and the two drivers are very different. Some people will always say there is no justification for a crash or a close call, others say that it's just part of racing and the drivers' personalities. The worst of senna's behaviour is slightly comparable to the better of schumacher's controversial moves.

You seem to be forgetting the fact that before the race he said he'd run into Prost if he beat him to the first corner. From memory it was in protest to the pole sitter being put on the dirty side of the track.

I find it f**king HILARIOUS that the same people that are openly smoking Senna's pole are the very same people that can't wait to crucify Schumacher.

I guess it's ok to openly admit to causing accidents and taking people out of races in order to win a race/championship, so long as you die in a race at some point.

It was realising that that made me ease up on Schumacher a bit ... I still don't love the guy but like Senna, there's no denying his talent, back in the day at least.

The other thing they had in common besides talent was total ruthlessness. Senna DID drive Prost off the road at Turn 1 in Suzuka, he admitted as much. Both Schumacher and Senna would do anything to win, whether or not it was legal.

Senna is still the better driver IMHO, he just didn't win as many races because he had better opponents.

Just read something in an article about an Aston Martin DB6. Apparently some bloke called Peter Robinson is building a motorsport resort, including a full GP circuit, out at Bacchus Marsh. Anyone know more, or is it just crap?

No Ben, just calling out someone taking the usual stab at Ferreri only winning because they have the most money.

And the Senna thing has always pissed me off. He wasn't really even the standout of his era, let alone of all time. There was a whole host of drivers that could mix it up with him. Its just the power of the media.

No Ben, just calling out someone taking the usual stab at Ferreri only winning because they have the most money.

And the Senna thing has always pissed me off. He wasn't really even the standout of his era, let alone of all time. There was a whole host of drivers that could mix it up with him. Its just the power of the media.

Well for starters I'm a huge Ferrari fan.

So next time instead of having a brain explosion, take a breath and realise this is the internet.

G`day Lads,

Senna ,i was lucky to have grown up in Norfolk LOTUS country,

& work with guys that RUN SENNA in F1 JPS days

He was OBSESSED WITH WINNING AT ALL COSTS,

the day he puntted prost off in Japan was sign of what he was about,

HONDA`S buget for 2 cars for season was 97millon pounds they had a store stacked with F1 engines for 1 team only

not sure how long most of you have been in to F1s,

but watching for 35+ years now,

& having worked in FF1600s,OPEL/LOTUS series,

seeing DC in 87 win starof tomorrow champoinship,

few others about to,

we did 8 gps surport racing in uk germany france & so on,

seeing what the cars were about & NOW is a big difference,

YOUR ONLY AS GOOD AS CAR YOUR IN,look at Prost & mansell in Ferrari Prost won Tittle MANSELL broke his car most outings :whistling: ,

LOTS of guys that were great drives never had opportunity to get F1 seat due to FUNDING,

its all about funds who has & rest of wanttobes,

i see many RATE Drivers :cool: ,

hard to do as many drive poor cars & have bad luck.

Lets Hope rest of season will be an enjoyable one & see it go down to wire again :thumbsup:

Once he'd committed to the gap there wasn't much he could do, Senna had 2 wheels off the track trying to avoid the contact, which combined with getting air on the ripple strip made lose steering. All I've been saying is that, in my opinion, that's a more justified racing incident than what schumacher did, and the two drivers are very different. Some people will always say there is no justification for a crash or a close call, others say that it's just part of racing and the drivers' personalities. The worst of senna's behaviour is slightly comparable to the better of schumacher's controversial moves.

Also when senna pulled over to help a fellow racer it was a more dangerous time, when people died more often. There was a big steam/smoke signal to slow drivers down and senna was hardly parked in the middle of the track. It doesn't look like there was anything but safety dictating his actions.

People's opinions will always vary on this, and have since 1990.

For the record I do think schumacher is a good driver and that many of his victories were great drives, I also think he has done some brutal and shifty things on track that few other drivers would even contemplate, and that any decent driver given #1 status with ferrari from 2000-2004 had a great chance at championship wins.

Meh to each their own

Ah sorry, I guess all the F1 experts, including Martin Brundle who drove with him, must be wrong...Hell, even Senna himself must've been wrong.

If you actually believe what you wrote in that first paragraph, you're a moron.

As for Senna pulling over, I think you've missed my point. In those days, regulations and safety were not exactly top priority. These days that stuff is less likely to happen. Not only that, but with the cars being infinitely safer than they were back then, passing drivers would have far less reason to believe that the driver involved is seriously hurt, or that them pulling over would do anything more than get in the way of the trained medical professionals who are on site to deal with those exact incidents.

Note the key point there.

Toyota.

bah, everyone remembers and glorifies Senna because the media does, and has been beating it into them for the past 17years. End of story.

mix that with the nostalgia of the 'good ol days' and he's gone from someone known during his career as a fierce rival for Prost and who really only beat Prost because he'd either crash into him or slam the door to make Prost avoid a crash, to some sort of martyred F1 saint.

:thumbsup:

why does that seem spammy

The terrible use of the English language?

Toyota prove that money alone is not going to get you anywhere.

Regularly outspent each years champion team (substantially I may add) for pretty much every year they were in the competition.

...and then hired Ralf?!?!

Go figure. That's like hiring Angelina Jolie's brother as a grid girl.

Ah sorry, I guess all the F1 experts, including Martin Brundle who drove with him, must be wrong...Hell, even Senna himself must've been wrong.

If you actually believe what you wrote in that first paragraph, you're a moron.

Easy, no need to get personal. You've clearly been into f1 longer than me, but that doesn't mean any opinions of mine that vary from yours are wrong. I haven't seen Senna admit fault, I guess that's my bad. Without him admitting fault, (to me) it looks that once Senna had committed to the gap, and Prost turned in, what was he supposed to do? Prost sure didn't leave enough room for an f1 car there, so I guess it was to Senna to back off the throttle? (Which was never going to happen).

Quite the opposite of the McLaren drivers atm lol.

Anyways, though I didn't watch him drive, I don't think senna is quite on the same level as schumacher, he wasn't disqualified from a championship for example, and senna's introductions in books/articles etc don't usually start with "love him or hate him" etc. I didn't realise how brutal senna was, well not in the context with schumacher. But I don't think they are on the same level... Noone has gone to the extremes that schumacher has to win.

Anyways, the last couple of pages remind me of:

http://cdn.thegloss.com/files/2010/10/someone_is_wrong_on_the_internet1.jpg

Maybe talk should turn to turkeey?

Apparently the fuzz are bringing massive updates this weekend. They have a decent gap to try to close, and with testing, I can't see them catching the vettel.

Looking forward to the pit stop challenge again, istalbul park is a tyre killer. Turn 8 after 50 laps should be very good viewing

I haven't seen Senna admit fault, I guess that's my bad. Without him admitting fault, (to me) it looks that once Senna had committed to the gap, and Prost turned in, what was he supposed to do? Prost sure didn't leave enough room for an f1 car there, so I guess it was to Senna to back off the throttle? (Which was never going to happen).

here's one of many sources, a 1991 interview with Senna:

http://www.grandprix.com/ft/ft00090.html

All right, if tomorrow Prost beats me off the line, at the first corner I will go for it, and he better not turn in because he is not going to make it.

it was partly a 'square up' for the previous year and partly a petulant sook at having to start from the dirty side of the track. either way its a premeditated decision to take another driver out if they get in front. What a champion.

So that's how he secured one championship, another he won with less points than Prost because they only counted the best 11 (from 16) results back then! WTF? And the 3rd all his rivals had at least 5 retirements and he only suffered 1.

Edited by hrd-hr30

...and then hired Ralf?!?!

Ironic thing is Ralf's quite a successful DTM racer. Shows the gulf in the comparative skill level required for competitiveness in F1 and a prod-car derived racing category, I guess.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
×
×
  • Create New...