Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lol Webber sure is one tall poppy.

interesting to see how he performed so badly, historically its one of his worst performances, hell bounce back though, people under rate him but he's tough as f**ken nails.

The theory on RBR is that they have a better aero package and weight distribution without KERS although it was speculated that they run a KERS lite which is available off the line for one use only but there was no sign of that today.

Captn Chin showed high tyre wear, no grip and a big gap to his team mate that just wasn't apparent from the earlier races of the 2010 season with the exception of the last race last year. Hard to understand why the setup was so far away unless there is a problem with the car.

i thought that weeber got stuffed over by team stratergy just like final round last year. he came in and put hards on. that didnt work so no one elce put them on. he lost all his time from then and had to revert to med/soft and couldnt make the time back up

Vettol complained of the tyres going off at a simmilar time to mark and they brought mark in first. if you watch just this part of RBR im sure webber will always pit first and change compounds. this then detemins what vettol gets.

somthing to keep an eye on.

i thought that weeber got stuffed over by team stratergy just like final round last year

Nah, Webber was harder on the tyres. Any strategy was rightly in SV's favour due to track position if any benefit went to him at all.

He was farked by the front right tyre change losing him around 3 seconds which probably cost him one place only.

I have totally changed my tune. Ferrari should keep massa fir as long as humanly possible

With a backbone that weak and performances that horrible he'll be screwwing them out of WCC's for years

again, :rofl:

Based on this weekends (admittedly limited) evidence, I have grave fears for anyone's ability to stop Vettel walking his 2nd drivers title, assuming the team can provide him with a car that finishes races most rounds this year.

sooo both saubers got disqualified for breach of technical regulations hey...Pity, both had solid performances today!

:mellow:

Might need to put the Sauber Jacket back in the wardrobe

http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2011/3/11874.html

The one hd coverage was absolutely woeful today especially the post race press conference. They cut away halfway through Petrovs first question usually they show the three driveers answering a few things about the race and then go to the winner for another few questions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...