Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

T67-25G uses the same L2 turbine wheel as the TD06L2-20G

TD06H-25G uses a 67/58.8mm 11 blade turbine wheel

the TD06H-25 is very similar to a Garrett GT3576 in size with only a couple of mm in it.

compare that to the 61/54.1mm turbine wheel of the L2/T67

now there are a bucket load of variations of the MHI turbos such as what MHI call the Super 20G or the TE06, all very similar, but different enough to cause headaches when buying from the likes of kando, the the shaft sizes and wheel trims vary

eg Kando sell a T67-24V a TE06H-25G etc, even sell the Large 67mm turbine wheel equipped turbo fitted with a 20G compressor.

So be wary, and ask before handing over your cash.

check my TD06 thread for more info re: wheel sizing etc

Ok I understand now the t67 has the l2 turbine but a 25g compressor correct

Yes.

Greddy called it a T67, as effectively it is a TD07S and a TD06L2 joined together using the 4" inlet TD07S comp cover with the L2 turbine housing and centre section...kinda like a Garrett T3/T4

25G/20G/24V/18G etc is the compressor wheel

Fark it...i am selling all my mitsu fluff and going KKK K27s etc. Info on them is even more confusing :whistling:

Do you want mine?

cbf going to get it, but iirc it is a 7200 11:11 with a #6 rear housing with a porsche flange pattern

LOL

ok so can someone confirm this if this is the correct TD06SL2-20G that i've bought *which is same as jez & artz*?

i hope its not the wrong one Lol

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/280776600350?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649

ok so can someone confirm this if this is the correct TD06SL2-20G that i've bought *which is same as jez & artz*?

i hope its not the wrong one Lol

http://www.ebay.com....984.m1423.l2649

LOL its the right one man, good work.

Johnny B - go with tried and true man. In theory the water cooled one should work just as well but run cooler, but it comes with a smaller compressor cover and thus could be a lucky dip in terms of results. The T67 is a known performer, no guess work!

Stock manifold yes, don't understand why people r using the aftermaket manifolds for the TD06 turbos unless its for a T67 which fouls the engine cos its too big. What gate r u using dori, Tial?? Are you plumbing it off the turbo housing? Keep us posted....:thumbsup:

modded the stock manifold to suit 44mm v-band ext gate, running either a tial mvr or turbosmart hyper gate

tbh, i think after all the costs add up, it will be about the same price if not cheaper than a HG unit fitted.

turbo with lines (can sell for $$ if not needed) $740

gate $300

modded manifold $220

dump + screamer $150

intake $150

= $1560~ (say $1650 for gaskets/bolts/nuts/studs etc)

HG turbo on its own is $1500 + delivery + custom intake + either use OEM lines (needs massaging to fit) or need braided stuff ($$), fk around with the dump/front pipe issue melting the aircon hose.

Ur right, thats what I figured out - Putting together THIS stuff is about the same or cheaper than the HG ss stuff, the HG turbo on its own is $1500 + GST = $1650 = ouch, I just burnt a large hole in my pocket for a turbo only...

Whereas with this one, if ur not happy with the turbo, u can always get another spec turbo or parts (diff wheels / housing etc, as kando sell a wide range of this stuff for cheap) for approx $700 and ur sailing ...!

What do u guys think??

And where did u get the 44mm Tial for $300 - the cheapest on eGay is $365 + delivery = approx $400

People car do things for all different costs, some cheaper some end up paying more.

I dare say since these setups work so well you would be best to spend the few extra dollars and making the setup 100%. Using some high temp sheathing on lines, good quality bends and reducers/flanges studs etc so you dont blow out gaskets etc or warp with temp.

A gate for $300? I paid about $500 for my Turbosmart. I paid more then $150 in just flanges, studs, gaskets and elbows + reducer. So not saying anyone was wrong but we all often pay different prices for things and I know i couldnt do my setup with external gate that cheaply

med_gallery_462_50_238480.jpg

Tial MVR is the go Dori, proven performer. Also not sure where to get it under $400 or I would LOL

Ron your comments are all well and good, but please make sure you have a firm understanding of the setup you are describing and how it works before you attempt to undertake such a move.

Make sure you have your labour aspect of things well sorted and know the implications of a screamer (if you opt to go that way) or how standout your setup will be to NSW highway patrol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
    • Not a problem at all Lithium, I appreciate your help regardless. I've pulled a small part of a log where the target pressure was 28psi and it spiked to 36.4psi. I've only just begun using Data Log Viewer so if I'm sending this in the wrong format let me know.
×
×
  • Create New...