Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Received my turbo today, Dam it's a small thing. how do i measure this turbo to see if its actually a 10cm housing and not a 8cm.

The t3 flange has casting imperfections on them and looks shonky. ARTZ housing looks way better condition than mine.

Would it cause any issues and should I say something to Eiji?

looks pretty dodge.

23854006.th.jpg

ARTZ housing;

04112011772.jpg

I wouldn't worry about that "imperfection" too much... It's not going to make any difference, but if you are worried just rub it down a little with a small file.

The housings also look tiny compared with a Garrett, it's just because they are skinny

Edited by SimonR32

ordered boxing day, arrived today.

minus the pub holidays so not too bad.

thanks for the tip Simon!

tune eta, 1st wk of Feb!

so ~14 days

Do u think a TD06 20g internal gate kando would be too big for a 2L 4cyl engine, lag monster ?

nope , sr boys seem to love them :)

Speaking of build quality, I thought I would post some pictures of my turbo because I have just pulled the front cover off!

This is after half a dozen track days, 3 times on the dyno, a trip to the drags, powercruise, a few motorkhanas and about a year of light driving :)

Front Cover Outside

2012-01-09204357Large.jpg

Front Cover Inside

2012-01-09204428Large.jpg

Compressor Wheel

2012-01-09204214Large.jpg

2012-01-09204225Large.jpg

Reason why the front cover is off (Welding on an elbow)

2012-01-09204448Large.jpg

Do u think a TD06 20g internal gate kando would be too big for a 2L 4cyl engine, lag monster ?

apparently the TD06 wheels dont work too well in the internal gate housings.

Ive done a td05h-18g on an SR20DE, tuned by Jez, is very impressive yet Im not confident the internal gate TD06 variant would be the same

best thing to do would be to get a china spec trust 3 bolt manifold, then get the 8cm trust 3 bolt rear housing and a decent gate. you would be laughing then :thumbsup:

Ive done a td05h-18g on an SR20DE, tuned by Jez, is very impressive yet Im not confident the internal gate TD06 variant would be the same

Whats the difference between the TD05 and TD06? I wouldnt think there is enough wheel difference to make a difference. Is it because the TD05-18G you used was the T518Z rip off so has a different design housing?

Well I just ordered my TD05H-18G. Be interesting to see if backed to back with the TD06-20G. I am hoping I still make 250rwkws and hopefully make at least 25rwkws more at 4,500rpm.

I just ordered my TD05H-18G. I am hoping I still make 250rwkws and hopefully make at least 25rwkws more at 4,500rpm.

Isn't that a fairly small setup? Found a Kinugawa chart indicating they are good for ~250 crank kW at max.

Hmmm, maybe a t67 would go well on my 31

Or myabe its a bit too ambitious for a stock bottom end rb30e

Thoughts ?

Sounds pretty normal to me, just stick a small cam in it aswell, (something around [email protected]) and some springs ,and you will make good power ,most people stick 3540's .82 on them at least...

If you don't do cam, it probally won't make more than 240-250rwkw, thats about all you will ever get with stock camshaft, regardless of turbo...

I'd try a TD06H 25G 12cm personally, with a auto it would run 10's on a good condition stock bottom end i would have thought...

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...