Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well its either an 8cm or a 12cm for you, id say 12cm will still be less than optimal for drift but 8cm might just work.

I seem to say this a lot but if you read the entire thread you will find some comment on 8cm variants on RB25s throughout. Earlier in the thread status actually commented on how an 8cm T67 acts on an RB25...

I can only assume the SL2 wheel in an 8cm housing will work easier being driven by a 20g than it would a 25 :) now time to read the entire thread.

well its either an 8cm or a 12cm for you, id say 12cm will still be less than optimal for drift but 8cm might just work.

I seem to say this a lot but if you read the entire thread you will find some comment on 8cm variants on RB25s throughout. Earlier in the thread status actually commented on how an 8cm T67 acts on an RB25...

I can only assume the SL2 wheel in an 8cm housing will work easier being driven by a 20g than it would a 25 :) now time to read the entire thread.

yeah we used to use alot of 8cm instead of 10cm but the small gain in response is countered by the massive loss in mid and high end torque. will post a comparo on friday when im back at the shop. Its uprising how much the 8cm holds the turbo back on a 2.5 litre.

yeah we used to use alot of 8cm instead of 10cm but the small gain in response is countered by the massive loss in mid and high end torque. will post a comparo on friday when im back at the shop. Its uprising how much the 8cm holds the turbo back on a 2.5 litre.

This is good timing, a decision I've been pondering fits well into this actually. I'm helping with a budget build of a turbo Honda running an F20B engine (basically destroked H22A, makes 147kw stock) which will be running ~11psi - I have been seriously considering recommending one of these turbos with an 8cm hotside for it.

I know on an RB25 would better suit a larger housing given you'd be pumping more boost into etc, but what about a slightly smaller engine which flows similar to the RB25 but will be running lower boost - do you think in these circumstances the 8cm may be more suiteable?

As normal, aims are for a reliable turbo which isn't too laggy and particularly in the case of a +T type build, keep intake temps and exhaust pressure nice and engine friendly.

there is a car you should look at on NS called JET200. Its nothing special but it documents the guys experience with a T67 on an SR. I think he ended up wanting shorter gearing and a much higher rev limit despite notable gains when going down to an 8cm housing.

What's the power goals of the Honda? In any event I think the T67 isn't a great option at 11psi anyway.

Ahh I mixed Jez and Status' post and thought the latest talk was about TD06 20G setups.

I was thinking a 20G with 8cm housing, car is currently running some kind of Ebay GT3582R look alike turbo which is both very laggy and potentially a grenade. Really anything thats nicer to drive and going to be reliable would be good, obviously T3 flanged a must.

I'm going to be tuning it on a Dynapack, so should be looking at easily >220kw on 11psi.

I will be tuning an internal td06 20g next week, but this one is different, the customer has removed alot of material to make the flow alot better out of the normally poor flowing gate.

9a589ca7.jpg

6eed5cf9.jpg

Interesting to see the results. Good work on giving it a go. I would think you could get away with milling out all the centre/bridge and drilling and tapping an additional bolt hole for mounting a big bellmouth dump pipe. Or are you going to try and split the the gate and turbine gases?

Something makes me think that central bridge is the restriction itself..All those exhaust gases flowing out of the exhaust housing and wastegate hole would be at some point partly hitting that bridge, deflecting off it and being a restriction to the overall gas flow, hence more force required by the engine to push them out = less power / crappy internal gate housing design.. Just thoughts.pinch.gif

I cant believe this is even a debate. Its a 300 pesos manifold ffs. Nobody in their right mind is going to say its as good as the high end stuff.

What it is though is great value for money for the builder on a budget,I used it simply because it was convenient at the time. Pluses outweigh the negatives as far as I'm concerned.

A. price

B. performance

C. durability

As the dyno showed all these twats saying angle this and angle that are just that...twats. the manifold flows without restriction, If exhaust gas flowed in the opposite dierection the merge collector would be far more relevant, as it is 6 pipes feed in to the exhaust housing regardless of the shape of the merge.

I've run up 5 k on it so far. Its rock solid, no warping cracking leaking or shifting whatsoever.

Would I use one on my big engine...No. Plain and simple. Not because I m afraid it wouldnt work, merely because I cant get my head around a cheap job for a high end engine.

Bang for buck this is one of the best mods I have done to date.

Would be interesting if someone could mill out the bridge on those internal gates and weld a 6 bolt flange on there like stao does with the hypergears.

GTS scott, i can't get NS on my computer , what was the deal with JET 200?, did it pick up power with a 8 cm vs 10cm housing on the Sr20?

cheers

darren

Ahh I mixed Jez and Status' post and thought the latest talk was about TD06 20G setups.

I was thinking a 20G with 8cm housing, car is currently running some kind of Ebay GT3582R look alike turbo which is both very laggy and potentially a grenade. Really anything thats nicer to drive and going to be reliable would be good, obviously T3 flanged a must.

I'm going to be tuning it on a Dynapack, so should be looking at easily >220kw on 11psi.

Thinking about it further, does any of the Kando/Mitsi peoples think a TD06SL2-18G with 8cm housing could even work well for this setup - this is on a 2litre VTEC Honda running ~11psi for anyone who missed the first post I made about this.

Interesting to see the results. Good work on giving it a go. I would think you could get away with milling out all the centre/bridge and drilling and tapping an additional bolt hole for mounting a big bellmouth dump pipe. Or are you going to try and split the the gate and turbine gases?

I suggested that but he welded the blocking plate back on so still running the 3 bolt flange. He thinks he will gain a fair bit.

Will see when i tune it

Thinking about it further, does any of the Kando/Mitsi peoples think a TD06SL2-18G with 8cm housing could even work well for this setup - this is on a 2litre VTEC Honda running ~11psi for anyone who missed the first post I made about this.

From what I know the SL2 18g gives a more linear delivery than its 20g counterpart. But the only videos I have seen have been on mildly tuned 1JZ's. The outcome was as fast as the 20g from memory, but more of a passive aggressive approach rather than the brutal hit of the 20g.

Either way, your now talking about a result that doesnt warrant a big dirty TD06SL2 wheel. Here:

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-3-Anti-Surge-TD05H-18G-w-T3-8cm-V-Band-External-Gate-Hsg-/290677530717?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item43adbb205d

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...