Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeh, between United and Caltex it will be pretty easy for me to run E85 now. I am still going to just use Datalogit to switch back to ULP for daily duties and making sure I dont have E85 just sitting around in the tank and lines when I am away with work etc.

So can someone start to explain the difference between Artz's RB5-20G result and DVS JEZ's? Surely VCT and tweaking a tune doesnt make 1,000rpm difference in response???? I ask because I have read that on some setups E85 can make a setup spool a little slower....have not seen any cases of it yet and wondering if its a factor in this case

VCT is worth alot and TBH we have used a lower ramp on ARTZ car to save the clutch so it actually could come on sooner.

You will also notice the housing on artz l2 falls over hard over 6300rpm too, we have done a couple lately and this size housing is not real happy with the extra 500cc and 300rwkw is about the limit we have found safely before exhaust pressures and egts get scary..

Interesting, a friend had HKS cams in his RB25 that deleted the VCT and its always dangerous to judge and form an opinion on the basis of one car but perhaps there was maybe a difference in throttle response and maybe 100-200rpm, hard to tell with the change in cams...but not 500-1000rpm. I would expect the 500cc, 0.5 bump in compression and VCT would at least give you at least a 500rpm improvement

but its the same size housing as the T67 10cm??

300kw is far more than I know what to do with anyway, just hoping I can pickup my lost midrange really..

If I can do that and run a solid 280 @ 16-17 psi its a damn good result IMO;Bragging rights are always cool tho. :D

You will also notice the housing on artz l2 falls over hard over 6300rpm too, we have done a couple lately and this size housing is not real happy with the extra 500cc and 300rwkw is about the limit we have found safely before exhaust pressures and egts get scary..

but its the same size housing as the T67 10cm??

Exactly... Thats really weird that your finding the limit of the same hot side sooner with a smaller compressor... Perhaps the 20G is pumping hotter air at 300kw than the 25G is which makes it take up more volume... Thoughts?

I don't think the temp of the inlet charge makes jack all difference to the temp and pressure of exhaust gases.

I suspect it is more a function of back pressure from the modified std manifold (assuming Artz is running a 10cm housing). I have made my thoughts pretty clear on the std manifold in the past. They get the job done, but at at the sort of power many are making I think you make the power easier with a better exhaust manifold, and often more power and with snappier throttle response.

I don't think the temp of the inlet charge makes jack all difference to the temp and pressure of exhaust gases.

I suspect it is more a function of back pressure from the modified std manifold (assuming Artz is running a 10cm housing). I have made my thoughts pretty clear on the std manifold in the past. They get the job done, but at at the sort of power many are making I think you make the power easier with a better exhaust manifold, and often more power and with snappier throttle response.

Ahh yes. Forgive my ignorance there :P I am ill and forgetful at best right now.

POS stock manifold.

And yes apologies to all for not just going topmount as I know it would have yielded more definitive results...hindsight says I should have..just another stuff up in a list of many..:SBut I don't believe the stock manifold is an issue here as I know of a few running 350 on it..it may not be considered safe and is far from ideal, but it can be done...

so got a reply back from them on ebay:

It still works as there is high % of Inconel.

If there is smoke, and then you need to start take care of this issue.

Gonna push for a replacement cause im not really interested in putting a timebomb back on...

yeah try and push for a replacement, that's a pretty poor response. hope you can get it sorted.

not good to see yours showing signs of wear already where as others are still going strong.

And yes apologies to all for not just going topmount as I know it would have yielded more definitive results...hindsight says I should have..just another stuff up in a list of many..:SBut I don't believe the stock manifold is an issue here as I know of a few running 350 on it..it may not be considered safe and is far from ideal, but it can be done...

Nah im sure its fine Davo. Im sure it can be pushed to that point but it has to become a restriction at some point. It would obviously be easier done through a 35R also, rather than a TD06.

Its all a balance of parts in the end. You will probably find with any given setup you could do something as trivial as move the WG position or length of the WG tube and gain/lose very noticable amounts. That's just the nature of this hobby.

We all said it in the start, SimonR32 hit the nail on the head with his setup. If I was to do a T67 I would do my best to model his. That being said, if I was to do a 20G, I am pretty damn impressed with your results thus far and would be stoked with sub 300kw thats on from 3500.

Ahh yes. Forgive my ignorance there :P I am ill and forgetful at best right now.

POS stock manifold.

And yes apologies to all for not just going topmount as I know it would have yielded more definitive results...hindsight says I should have..just another stuff up in a list of many..:S But I don't believe the stock manifold is an issue here as I know of a few running 350 on it..it may not be considered safe and is far from ideal, but it can be done...

LOL, You guys are as defensive about the modded std manifold route as I am with people who sh1t on RB20s :)

Each setup and approach has its merit and advantages, and each have their disadvantages. I am not pissing in anyones pocket with this statements but in my eyes Artz result is about the most impressive in this thread. The power and response using 98 with a modified std manifold is damn impressive. It will be real interesting if with the new clutch and some more boost how the result will change.

And I am by no means a high mount for all occasions guy. I was rather disappointed in the results of my 6boost manifold not being able to match my Greddy manifold. Others may have the same or different result...but for me I was disappointed. There are reasons why I like the high mount option, but many why I don't which is why I have a HKS low mount manifold laying around in my parts bin to be used if current engine goes bang.

I am told tuners can tell when a setup is working well by how engines respond to different levels of fuel, ignition, boost etc. If back pressure and levels of ignition the engine can take are not holding you back then I doubt there is much to be concerned about. Since my general thinking is 280rwkws (some dynos are different) is about the limit of the 20G wheel on 98 then in your case the setup works well and its doubtful there is much value in doing anything to it other then some more boost vs returns.

Is there anything you don't have laying around Roy..

Nah I was concerned at Trent saying it would top out at 300kw..

I forget that of course was a pulp result..

I don't see any reason why it shouldn't smash 330 on e85..

So, my goal only being 280-300 do i use e85 and keep the boost low or just stick with trusty old pulp and 18 psi.

everything i see and hear tells me e85 is far superior all round...

Btw...have clutch now, have been quoted 350 for fitment which is fair and can get it done next week...dont have time to do it myself lately so may as well just do this.. Plus I saved heaps on the clutch so have a little left over... :D

Question is, do I need to gets some ks on the clutch before it goes on the dyno.?

Be it myself I would stay safe from shortages on 98, being able to fill up wherever I go.

But thats your call. E85 IS the superior fuel, if the car is set up for it. Theres a thread in the FI section on a guys fuel setup which detailed some important info about E85 and sitting around ETC.

Why not tune for both and set it up so you can switch between the tunes? That's exactly what I'll be doing once my new clutch is in.

I reckon use E85 to get a better punch out of the midrange and keep things safe up top. Maybe tune for maximum power, just to see what the turbo is capable of, then dial it back. Is there a point to going past 300rwkw in a daily driven RWD on street tyres?

Is there anything you don't have laying around Roy..

Nah I was concerned at Trent saying it would top out at 300kw..

I forget that of course was a pulp result..

I don't see any reason why it shouldn't smash 330 on e85..

There is a lack of good looking women in my parts, but have car shit up to my ears. By product of being single and not having a mortgage

A friend recently went the E85 route for his track only R32 GTSt (c/w dirty RB25). Perhaps his 3076 has a little more flow potential then the 20G but i suspect you could give 320-330 a nudge on E85 based on his result

526896_10150924763563662_643798661_12898382_2091813083_n.jpg

I am going to give E85 a nudge as my car is very sensitive to ignition these days so talk is it would benefit more than some on E85. I suspect I wont get a back to back result with the 20G, rather the 73HTA wiht 98 vs E85 as I am praying that this lump of alloy isnt a steamer like everything else I have thrown at my car the past 24 months :(

Exactly birds, the safety is the key. I bet if you tune for both you will never run the 98 again. (unless you want to drive to Sydney in it one day)

I never had any storage issues. I think people get all worried due to the storage problems methanol has, they are not the same fuel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...