Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  On 30/05/2012 at 8:35 AM, Crans said:

Do we have any results here from this turbo? http://www.ebay.com....#ht_2463wt_1139

Same wheels and covers as all the T67-25g results... Only difference being the anti-surge cover (which may or may not make any difference) and the size of the shaft which should make no difference.

  On 30/05/2012 at 2:36 AM, STATUS said:

Ratio works as follows as we work back from the large engine will small turbo scenario.

48psi in exh manifold and only 10psi in inlet manifold works out to a ratio of 4.8:1 in theory if we were to try and get the same 48psi of back pressure in the exhaust manifold on the 2l we would need to have 32psi on the intake based on the 1.5:1 ratio (derived from testing).

ahh ok now I get ya, I was reading it wrong.. :thumbsup:

  On 30/05/2012 at 8:45 AM, SimonR32 said:

Same wheels and covers as all the T67-25g results... Only difference being the anti-surge cover (which may or may not make any difference) and the size of the shaft which should make no difference.

thats not what she said :P

I don't think it will make anymore power than it did before..

Possibly spool a little earlier and feel better/faster through the midrange though.How's your compression, holding up alright, have u gone new valve springs as well as cams?

Lies 600hp or bust! :yes:

If it went another 10-20hp up top and 20-30 through midrange I'll be happy... Hoping that 20psi will be similar to my old high boost without cams.

No valve springs, mine have been fine up till now.

Compression tests are for nancies :whistling:

Edited by SimonR32

I went to run cams without the valve springs but a few people scared me out of it without horror stories :/

Mine were fitted up this week with the springs and will be tuned possibly Monday, Good luck with yours!!! Hope the cams do make that sort of improvement!!!

The kando should be similar to 3076 yeah? I think thats what i read in your thread?

566hp at 1.7 bar (422kw) without correction

515hp at 1.3 bar (384kw) without correction

So it made an extra 40hp and we didn't even push it as hard, comes on about 350rpm sooner as well. I'll post up graphs tomorrow at work :)

also 590hp at 1.7 bar (440kw) with correction LOL

Edited by SimonR32
  On 31/05/2012 at 12:01 PM, SimonR32 said:

566hp at 1.7 bar (422kw) without correction

515hp at 1.3 bar (384kw) without correction

So it made an extra 40hp and we didn't even push it as hard, comes on about 350rpm sooner as well. I'll post up graphs tomorrow at work :)

also 590hp at 1.7 bar (440kw) with correction LOL

Woah!!! :O

Congrats on the results! Amazing!!!

  On 31/05/2012 at 6:04 AM, SimonR32 said:

Lies 600hp or bust! :yes:

If it went another 10-20hp up top and 20-30 through midrange I'll be happy... Hoping that 20psi will be similar to my old high boost without cams.

No valve springs, mine have been fine up till now.

Compression tests are for nancies :whistling:

love how this man thinks! nice power dude, 140mph here u come!

For those who mentioned getting poncams, i used a guy in the US that delivered a set for my NEO for about $625 or something..... So they are certainly great value for money based on the results above..... Not sure what they sell for locally but if anyone wants the details i can go find them :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
    • I got adjustable after market rear camber arm to replace the stock one's because got sick of having to buy new rear tyres every few months. Can anyone please let me know what the best adjustment length would be. I don't have the old ones anymore to get measurements. I'm guessing the stock measurement minus a few mm would do it. Please any help on replacing them would be fantastic I've watched the YouTube clips but no-one talks about how long to set the camber arm to.
    • Heh. I copied the link to the video direct, instead of the thread I mentioned. But the video is the main value content anyway. Otherwise, yes, in Europe, surely you'd be expected to buy local. Being whichever flavour of Michelin, Continental or Pirelli suits your usage model.
×
×
  • Create New...