Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What is your opinion is the best ECU if you are interested in tuning yourself or at least tweaking a tune?cool.gif

I was thinking the Link but otoh it's quite complex so maybe something older and more basic for a beginner?

For an ECR33.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/351728-ecu-doing-your-own-tuning/
Share on other sites

Power fc is the best to learn on. Use paulrr33 power fcfaq. Read it a couple of times. Its the best resource fr power fc info. Totune though u need a wideband 02 sensor. 350$ and prefferably fc datalogit 400$. And then some like to use a pyrometer too which can be 300$ish

Power fc is the best to learn on. Use paulrr33 power fcfaq. Read it a couple of times. Its the best resource fr power fc info. Totune though u need a wideband 02 sensor. 350$ and prefferably fc datalogit 400$. And then some like to use a pyrometer too which can be 300$ish

They are like hens teeth for the RB25DET though. What's the 2nd best alternative?

Definitely get a power fc, datalogit and a wideband if you want to start tuning. All I can tell you is it takes just hours to learn how to tune but years to master it.

Definitely get a power fc, datalogit and a wideband if you want to start tuning. All I can tell you is it takes just hours to learn how to tune but years to master it.

I'm not convinced there is such a thing as a master tuner. Sure, people will get better at it but at the end of the day its just a brave sod who reads a bunch of clues required to reach an end point and takes the necessary steps to reach said end point. If they are lucky and the end point set by whoever put the car together is a good one then the tuner stands to achieve God status when in fact they just did what they had to do. If the end point was always going to be a bad one, then their name can easily become mud for just providing an inevitable result.

There will obviously be people with varying degrees of ability to read the clues and take the best possible steps to be able reach the inevitable - but so long as you are reading clues and realistically taking guesses (however educated) you're never the master of the situation :) If someone deems themselves a master, I'd personally approach with caution... as I'd say from my experience with this so far its a game where the old "The more you know, the more you know you don't know" thing runs very true.

You stand to learn a lot very quickly, so pay attention.

Just my opinion, of course.

Self learn isnt just plug it in and it starts tuning its self. U need to know what AFR the engine needs at each load point at different rpms etc etc.

Plus u need a wideband 02 sensor connected to the laptop or auxillery input of the ecu.

Power fcs are the best to learn on because they have a knock reading. This is a tuners best friend.

My opinion is vipec. Pretty easy to learn and the help file is actually very informative. I find myself refering to it all the time if I need furter information on a certain parameter.

IMO there is a bit of a dogma when it comes to guys being hung up on the power fc. The newer ecu's have a lot more going for them. Just because you know a product inside out doesn't mean it's the best thing out there.... Just means it's the best thing for you.

  • Like 1

+1 on the Vipec.

I used to have a Microtech and found that an absolute pain in the ass to try and learn how to tune on. I ended up selling it and buying a Vipec and now I do my own tuning.

The layout of it all and ease of finding settings makes it a pleasure.

i'd say the power fc is probably the easiest to learn and get running properly as you really only need to tweak the basemap a bit and setting up afm's and injectors is a piece of cake.

not sure about everyone else but at first the simplicity of the power fc is great, its easy to get a hang of, but after a while i found myself getting very frustrated at how basic some parts of it are. my main gripe with it is the way it handles ignition timing and to some extent interpolation. only being able to increase or decrease timing by whole degrees can be frustrating when trying to find the limit (yes i know most people would have 2-3 degrees safety margin but not everyone wants that) and it also seams to round up when interpolating, which in certain spots is a right pain in the ass. i've also seen it favour the last cell it was in when interpolating, for example as your approaching peak torque and each cell has a fair bit less timing than the last it doesnt seam to always interpolate evenly to give a nice steady drop in timing, which can be a problem. say your half way between 1 cell which has 20 degrees of timing and another with 16, the result for that point should be 18, a lot of the time i see 19 and 20.

i find myself wanting a vipec or similar more and more everytime i play with the power fc

microtech is the easiest and quickest cause its as simple as a calculator :P BUT MY SUGGESTION is --->

Powerfc as its the safest to self tune as you have the safety net of the knock monitor system so you can learn the ins and outs of timing.

ecu's like vipec microtec haltech etc require you to know what an engine can safely take and to tune it properly you should use some kind of listening device.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...