Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I didn't wanna start a thread just to ask this question, so i'll chuck it in here :)

I've got a GT3076 56T with a 0.82 housing and a 50mm external gate, currently 249kw at 1.1bar.

When I eventually get my rb25 engine rebuild, how much power do you think i could get out of this turbo, and what sort of boost would i have to run?

I've seen a few people getting 300kw on 98 fuel and 325kw on e85... is that about what i can expect? Or is higher possible?

I didn't wanna start a thread just to ask this question, so i'll chuck it in here :)

I've got a GT3076 56T with a 0.82 housing and a 50mm external gate, currently 249kw at 1.1bar.

When I eventually get my rb25 engine rebuild, how much power do you think i could get out of this turbo, and what sort of boost would i have to run?

I've seen a few people getting 300kw on 98 fuel and 325kw on e85... is that about what i can expect? Or is higher possible?

higher is possible on E85 (330-360) and expect 300-330 on 98 boost will be over 20psi.

The EFR series from BW also has good results too compared directly to Garrett and are the same pricing near enough. Only issue being a totally different flange pattern which makes choosing a BW turbo very expensive and committal as if you don't like it - its not just changing turbo, its the entire hot-side.

Pretty far from the truth, the efr's are ~1k more than a standard garrett. And a different dump flange does not equal the entire hot side. FWIW the old journal bearing bw's matched the garrett ball bearing for response and power in back to back testing by full race.

FWIW the old journal bearing bw's matched the garrett ball bearing for response and power in back to back testing by full race.

Yes, full race DO seem to have quite the relationship with BW.. Dont they?

From memory the press release by BW made note of testing done by fullrace for the product.

Smell's some 'Precise Power Tuned' love to me.

There is plenty of independent testing around the place showing pretty tight comparison between Borg Warner and Garrett GT-BB equivalents, sometimes Garretts can come out strong and sometimes the Borgs can. I am saluting one of the American Subaru tuners who has doing a completely straight up non-biased comparison between GT3076R, GTX3076R and EFR7670 turbos on exactly the same car. The GTX3076R was a little laggier than the GT3076R but made more power, the EFR7670 is yet to be dyno tested but apparently feels very good on the road in terms of boost recovery etc.

lol, move to Melbourne...then we'll talk :happy:

If you really want to be different, we can try for an east-west LS1 setup...

I have a full adidas tracksuit outfit, does this help ? its blue with the white stripes.

haha.

And I think Fineline is about to break out the Elton John !

Everybody Hide your babies !

Lithium - link up where this is going on?

Pretty far from the truth, the efr's are ~1k more than a standard garrett. And a different dump flange does not equal the entire hot side. FWIW the old journal bearing bw's matched the garrett ball bearing for response and power in back to back testing by full race.

Ye well there is hardly anyone other than Full Race that have done any testing thus far.

Ok so in effect it's more. Guess thats not all bad :ermm:

$3000 for a BW, $2000 for a Garrett

Have they released anything other than the .83 or .85 IW housing in T3?

If they have not - you need to change manifold or get adaptor plates made if you want to go bigger OR smaller in the rear housing size far as i understand it.

At least if you don't like the Garrett (or other turbo options, parts etc), you can just sell em and there are plenty of people ready to buy, hence what i mean by commital which sorta has more than just an obvious cost if you cant then go and resell if it doesnt work out :)

Yes, full race DO seem to have quite the relationship with BW.. Dont they?

From memory the press release by BW made note of testing done by fullrace for the product.

Smell's some 'Precise Power Tuned' love to me.

As Lith said there are plenty of independent workshop tests floating around, but I'm sure they're all on the BW payroll.

Lithium - link up where this is going on?

Ye well there is hardly anyone other than Full Race that have done any testing thus far.

Ok so in effect it's more. Guess thats not all bad :ermm:

$3000 for a BW, $2000 for a Garrett

Have they released anything other than the .83 or .85 IW housing in T3?

If they have not - you need to change manifold or get adaptor plates made if you want to go bigger OR smaller in the rear housing size far as i understand it.

At least if you don't like the Garrett (or other turbo options, parts etc), you can just sell em and there are plenty of people ready to buy, hence what i mean by commital which sorta has more than just an obvious cost if you cant then go and resell if it doesnt work out :)

I gave the link to everyone in the other thread. Medium frame Gtx turbos.

  • 2 weeks later...

Can't believe I missed this whole thread while I was in Canada! Someone should have PM'd me for comment haha

Isn't Simon running ethanol and an ass load of boost? Not sure what the deal is with that 3076 in terms of boost and fuel, but i dare say there are some points of difference between the two setups

The graph of the 3076R is running the same type of fuel E42 and a few psi less boost BUT he has Tomei poncams where mine are stock. It actually was down a little on power (due to timing issue) and should have made closer to 455rwhp on the day. On the same hub dyno it makes around 500rwhp where mine makes 520rwhp

Hard to say when you don't have a full mod list and boost level/fuel type taken into consideration. I suspect the Kando is running more boost as at 130kph (well before the GT3076R would be choking) the Kando turbo is making more power. At 110kph the GT3076R has 60whp more...

No doubt the Garrett comes on a little earlier, on the road he gets the equivalent boost at around 200rpm earlier in 4th gear... The flip side to the coin is mine holds power past 200km/hr while his turns over around 180km/hr

I believe E85 was used.

No doubt he will see this and confirm as I'm certain but not 100% confident.

But what you do NOT see on a dyno sheet, is how a turbo transitions up onto boost and so on.

I once had a 500-550hp T04E/T3 hybrid thing. I put on a GT30 - both at that point running 12psi and making around 220rwkw. The power delivery didn't look "overtly" different on a dyno sheet however on the street it was very noticeable in between gears and so on.

Ah indeed, it is such a tough decision at times as there is much for and much against.

Once again both were on same fuel, E42...

I can tell you both cars on the road are very nice to drive, even on the tightest turns at a motorkhana type event you would not really have any complaints about lag.

If people want a honest opinion on the 2 just ask :)

The Kando T67 is a slightly bigger turbo that makes more power top end and more power for longer while the Garrett GT3076R comes on boost sooner and hence has better mid range...

The GT3076R used to be my turbo pick for a RB25, the reason the other one car has one is because I convinced him it was the best turbo for the job. I was a jew so I bought a Kando T67 and saved myself about $1000 over the Garrett and was very impressed by the results.

They both have positives and negatives, I would call them a draw haha

Mind you I have seen a graph of a Trust T67 and it looked more impressive than both of them haha

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
×
×
  • Create New...