Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just finished reading this thread. Absolutely love your car, Love the stock look. May become the path for my 34 when its in my hands. What exhaust are you running?

Nice work! I have the Apexi system (Super Megaphone II i think)... Its so quiet its not funny yet still flows big power :yes:

Epic car Mattty love it! Good to see a fast RWD car that wasn't built just for da straight lines bro! :yes:

Thanks Mick_o..... It was always meant to be an all rounder, not particularily good in any one field, just able to have fun in as many as possible! I want to do more track and hill climb this year so will probably give things like Texi a miss to save stressing the poor thing out haha....

Hows your beast coming along?

Oi you still coming on the 26th

Yeah ill still try make it down, will see what happens with the cooling system i guess :)

The beasts going well thanks Matty just waiting for FP taking their sweet ass time with my 73 HTA been almost 3 months now :verymad:

Hoping the budget will permit me doing a few hillclimbs and track days myself... The bug bit on hard after my 1st track day at SMSP south circuit last year.

Looking forward to seeing you out there again soon :yes:

The beasts going well thanks Matty just waiting for FP taking their sweet ass time with my 73 HTA been almost 3 months now :verymad:

Hoping the budget will permit me doing a few hillclimbs and track days myself... The bug bit on hard after my 1st track day at SMSP south circuit last year.

Looking forward to seeing you out there again soon :yes:

Strange, they had mine too me in a week :O They were damn quick....

And yep i know what you mean about the track days, this year will be plenty of track time i hope! A few things on the calender already :yes:

Hopefully we can catch up at an event soon!

Anything exciting to report? Or is your car broke again? :P

Basterd :domokun: lol

Its jacked up just getting some work done before next Wednesday... Will see how it goes :whistling:

Will be plenty to update on as the year progresses! :yes:

  • Like 1

Track day!!! See you there

Want to follow for lines??

Ill be there ;)

Will be doing some tuning etc while on track so will be looking for some open space... Once done then yeah ill probably come play!

Lap times!

You need to beat the red turd tractor!

Lolz, if i get it to finish a session without breaking something then its a successful day, not that worried about times yet! Reliability is the issue i have!

oi, come HSV track day, 23rd March.. come chop bogandores

Ill see how i go as i have a fair bit on in March! Its tempting though!

So due to the smaller shed i decided to go to Super Fail and grab some Go Jack thingos... They are brilliant and it was basically buy one get one free! So i gave them a trial and they work awesome :woot:

IMG_7935_zps6967dbf6.jpg

IMG_7936_zps4dcbd6f3.jpg

IMG_7937_zps7c4e8de4.jpg

IMG_7938_zpsfec5ddfb.jpg

First time the car has been sideways and actually under control :rofl2:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...