Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hahaha thanks Roy that was probably a shorter and sweeter way of getting to the point of my little rant below :thanks:

Too many MYs lol sorry

But bringing people back to reality for a second! Its a 335rwkws std RB25 with a bolt on turbo! That is mega. Perhaps a gate, manifold or other combination may be a tad punchier, but show me a single bolt on turbo that will match this setup???? I haven't seen any? Would be pretty mint, stock looking setup if his pipes weren't so sex when you open the bonnet.

Edited by Mick_o

Cruise? I hope that's a cruise up a certain hill!!!! :domokun:

Haha i was just talking to Steve, i'll let u guys get ur practice up, then u may have a chance next time i come :P

Have fun dude. Keep me updated through out the day.

Yes Micko i will write a 1 sentence essay on ur car :D

Sweet Jezzy boy make sure you add words like awesome,fast and............awesome in that essay! Wait i already said awesome hahaha :nyaanyaa:

Haha i was just talking to Steve, i'll let u guys get ur practice up, then u may have a chance next time i come :P

Have fun dude. Keep me updated through out the day.

Yes Micko i will write a 1 sentence essay on ur car :D

LOL Mate, I think I commented on how rapid your car is a few pages back. The way the graph is scaled and the dyno is calibrated is directly related to what the results will be on paper.

I can definitely say that this car has a lot of low down torque and pull. When Mick dropped me at the station, he slowed to 2krpm in 4th gear and pulled away again as if it was in 2nd gear... It was nonsense. Then in his street, foot down/brake/foot down INSTANTLY back on full song.

Dunno how much better it could be. But it would be interesting to see, I think thats fair to say. But you lot need to stop babooning on about the graph, the cars an animal.

Wow hasnt this got some bad press now?! It went from wow nice results mate to meh thats not that crash hot HAHA! :blink:

I dont understand any of the dyno jargon you blokes are carrying on about lol!

Its just a sheet showing how much power it made FFS! To me it doesnt give a true representaion of how my car drives in the REAL world my car is far from dead under 4000rpm even if thats what a line on a piece of paper says to you in fact the car takes off like a dog shot in the ass 3800rpm in 2nd gear all the way to redline 3rd gear is on instantly if you stay hard on it in 2nd gear off boost its torquey as hell and feels as pokey as any big Falcodore 6 cylinder which is very impressive for a 2.5L imo... Yeah probably doesnt come on as early as alot of turbos or the GT3071 that it replaced for that matter. I dunno if my eyes deceive me or im not reading the dynosheet right but is 25psi @ 4000rpm on a factory manifold with an internal gate laggy?

My car is far from an exotic or by a big $$$ setup its a basic bolt on package on E85 nothing special really i woulda thought :ninja:

Now dont get me wrong this is not me getting defensive to the constructive critisism from you guys as im stoked with how well my car goes and how well it drives on and off boost is a credit to the boys at Unigroup engineering and 450hp isnt too shabby at all i reckon :banana:

I just feel some guys get caught up in the dynosheet too much as opposed to how it feels to drive on the road which is where it really counts......... Thats my 2c anyways haha

Jez is gunna be taking my car for a run this weekend so ill put the hard word on him to do a little write up and give you guys his opinion on how my car drives lol im sure as shit hes driven as many different turbo combinations on a 25 as anyone in here :thumbsup:

I don't think anyone is giving it bad press?!?

Personally I think it's an awesome results, as roy said it's probably one of the best low mount results I've ever seen on a stock RB25!

I was just hoping for a result that would take the next step in performance into the future and make us all sell our GT3076R and T67's to buy one... But in reality its similar to both, which is a great thing, just not game changing :)

But bringing people back to reality for a second! Its a 335rwkws std RB25 with a bolt on turbo! That is mega. Perhaps a gate, manifold or other combination may be a tad punchier, but show me a single bolt on turbo that will match this setup???? I haven't seen any? Would be pretty mint, stock looking setup if his pipes weren't so sex when you open the bonnet.

sure,

heres one, im sure abe2 can provide more information fi necessary

R33 Skyline

Hypergear turbo

bosh fuel pump

e85

plazmaman plenum

plazmaman intercooler

hks bov

i.d 1000cc injectors

power fc ecu

full zorst sytem

spitfire coil packs

Stock motor

358 Rwkw on 20 psi

:thumbsup: of course mate thats fine by me! If ya in town tomorrow arvo Andy come take my ride for a spin with the new nest of killerwasps under the bonnet :whistling:

I can post up an overlay of my GT3076 vs Mick's GTX3071 both on 98ron if anyone wants to see a comparison. (If Mick's gives me permission)

UnigroupDyno223122011_0000.jpg

My car has a HKS cast manifold and I am using an ATP 0.82 twin scroll housing with a single HKS gate. The gate spring is a pissy 7psi thing.

My impression from driving the two cars is that the GT3076 seems stronger down low and this is consistent with the dyno sheet. The TS housing/manifold might be part of the reason for this.

I tend to agree with Lith that the GTX range isn't really a step ahead but something more like 71mm GTX = 76mm GT as described. I wouldn't be overly confident of a great result buying a GTX3076 since the turbine is probably the limitation anyway.

We need more results for the GTX range but make no mistake Mick's car is a pleasure to drive just like Scott said. It felt stronger all around on E85 vs 98 ron (I haven't driven it with the final E85 tune....yet). It is lacking nothing at all on the road and pulls away cleanly in almost any gear which is a credit to the overall tune from Unigroup and with the wonders of pineapple juice it is making very stout power in a street setup.

And people insist the std manifold is a good thing and doesnt hold back performance :( No sin to be running the std manifold as it makes so much sense in many ways...but it does limit the performance you are going to get.

I hope my new turbo with a billet wheel doesnt trend the same way the GTX turbos are going with regards to response. They do flow better at higher pressure ratios...but, but yeh...at what cost to response. Still a good result for 90 ULP too!

The HTAs are pretty much the opposite, usually they seem to spool/respond slightly quicker than the equivalent non-"billet" wheel but still flow more... I'd say it could give pretty good results.

That sound really good Steve O but im going on the wisemans ferry cruise got the whole family going mate haha and ive promised jezzy boy a cruise too

I would like to start doing few events soon though now ive got some decent ponies to play with lol whether or not i can use them that well remains to be seen :whistling:

I'll have 3 go pro cameras from tonight for a few days, if you're not doing anything tomorrow come to Huntley hillclimb with a few GTR guys, you can enter on the day easy as!

That sound really good Steve O but im going on the wisemans ferry cruise got the whole family going mate haha and ive promised jezzy boy a cruise too

I would like to start doing few events soon though now ive got some decent ponies to play with lol whether or not i can use them that well remains to be seen :whistling:

Who cares. The second last time Steveo was there in his 400 kw GTR (although RWD on india's best tyres), he was the slowest out of everyone.... Even the ants crawling up the hill were smashing him BUT, I can assure you he had to most fun out of everyone.

slippery_when_wet_signs.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...