Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hahahah. i meant the ones by hands... you screw up something early on, and then you need to recalc, look through tables again, and do all sorts of ceebs shiet. even worse interpolating, gah.

else have to matlab or some shiet for non-hand calc ofc. also not a fan :P.

doing a few questions on some airframe loads... iterations done and then READ FROM A GRAPH... initial c_l is like 1.113... after iterations etc you end up with c_l = 1.099, as if you can even read that difference on the shitty resolution graph they give you, all for the "huuuuuuuuuuuuuuge" difference it makes in your final answer...

hahahaha my knowledge of matlab is sketchy at best, i'm pretty good at simulink, but that's all.

you know what's f**ked up? ANSYS.

Don't ever mention ANSYS again! Bringing back my nightmares mang!!!

_TI82107-motore.jpg

tumblr_m3e0nyJ5Qt1r5njkm.png

Yes that's a 156HP @ 183KG naked bike <3

$19,990

New price? If so, not bad for MV Agusta. Of you're going to spend that money, I reckon a Ducati Streetfighter is where it's at.

Or Speed Triple / Z1000 for nearly half the price...

Or a Monster 1100 EVO...

Either way, get another bike and this time make sure it's big and trackable.

sot sure if 1960's rock band........ or 2013 hipsters

i have read the posts.

hamish, rebuild the 991 3.6L and stroke/bore to 4.0L. first world 1% problem solved.

yes but i was thinking I could have the auto one for a daily and the RS 4.0 in manual...

Obviously I will need an RWB 930 track car aswell... I know it's more expensive to do it this was as I will have to buy 3 x prosches but I really do think it's the more logical option

combine reiteration question with

*insert typical engineering problem solving.jpg*

LOL

I would only go to that much effort in an exam. Every other time i'd be just meh. Or use answer from book and work backwards :P

Toby can I claim a bunch of stuff as business startup costs even though business hasn't made any legitimate monies. :P

Ed...actually.dont worry just remembered I don't need to claim anything..

Business startup costs have specific deduction requirements and claims. Its a bit complicated if you plan on doing it yourself.

Still a good idea to claim, so you can carry forward losses. Prob should be registered for GST too if you in losses

Need a big return again this year Tobes, got a lot of concreting to do lol

As long as you got receipts for your claims :P

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thank you, 100% the intent. New coils were due and the 17" sixers look/feel loads better than the stock wheels. The aero options are so spot on.   Thanks for the warm welcome, all!
    • 98 r34 gtt Been rocking my latest setup and car running like never before. Have put a good 200 miles on it since all the latest changes and additions. everything is dialed in and have been driving it a bunch.   However, all a sudden last weekend as soon as I pushed throttle passed 4k and the engine stumbles, (slow or fast acceleration) hesitates and doesn’t go above 4100 or so, like a misfire. Everything else seems fine. I had a “good” set of coil packs that I removed from car when I first got it when I changed them over to new coils. I swapped out current ones for those, but no change. I also changed the plugs, no change. Seems to rev over 4 when out of gear with no load just fine no “misfire”, but as soon as its in gear with a load of any kind, it “misfires” as soon as rpm drop back below 4 k it runs perfectly, smooth, starts, restarts and drives fine as long as I keep it below 4 k while in gear. All readings look fine, no CEL   Any idea as to what could all a sudden cause an issue when pushing rpms passed 4 k?
    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
×
×
  • Create New...