Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm looking at getting some Enkei RPF1s in SBC, going for a 18.85 +40 possibly for the front. Anyone know if this will fit okay or would I need to go closer to +30?

On 10/21/2018 at 8:55 PM, Gazzaa said:

Kinkstaah is right, the wheels will never fit but with stretched tyres you might be ok. You will need 235/30 for the front And likely 255/25 for the rear

i tried to get heroic and squeeze 275’s on the back but the passenger side has scrubbed away about 2mm of sidewall. With a +25 offset I’m gonn need to downsize to 265/35/18

I also adjusted the camber to negative 1.25 degrees

 

4013F0F8-AC65-4970-BE34-8C0FE330E414.jpeg

216E826C-BEC1-47A2-88D1-6435123DCAE0.jpeg

The wheels have 215/35 and 225/35 on them. I’m ok to roll fenders but if it’s gonna be sticking way too far out i’d rather not waste the money.

 

thanks for the advice guys. Maybe i’ll try and find 18x9.5 +22 and run staggered tires

7 minutes ago, kyl_er34 said:

If I were to go the 40, would it poke or something?

The higher the offset, the closer to the car. +40 will not fit as you will hit the suspension unless you are using a really skinny wheel. Try to stick between +25 and +35, width depending

11 hours ago, Ryno34 said:

The wheels have 215/35 and 225/35 on them. I’m ok to roll fenders but if it’s gonna be sticking way too far out i’d rather not waste the money.

 

thanks for the advice guys. Maybe i’ll try and find 18x9.5 +22 and run staggered tires

That doesn’t sound right for a 10.5. I’m not saying it’s impossible but the tyres would be completely stretched to their limits, plus with such a low sidewall, its not the correct fitment for a r34.

 

i have. 235/40 stretched over a 9.5 wheel up front

the 10.5 will 100% poke out but with a stretched 255/35 or 245/40 you might be in luck

it mostly comes down to ride height and your suspension set up 

 

this is how the 235/40 looks on the 9.5 (+20)

00045788-ED12-4CE7-9845-32227CC16CF9.jpeg

23 hours ago, Gazzaa said:

The higher the offset, the closer to the car. +40 will not fit as you will hit the suspension unless you are using a really skinny wheel. Try to stick between +25 and +35, width depending

 

13 hours ago, niZmO_Man said:

As mentioned above, higher positive number = closer to strut.

Nismo sizes: 8.5" +35, 9.5 +38

Okay well that rules out the +40s. So hard to find the right size in this colour I want. Would I be able to fit a 10/10.5 on the rear of a R34?

Your idea of 'fit' is different to others (and different to mine, which is also different to others)

10 +38 is a relatively common size at the rear of the R34.

With a square setup, the rear of the R34 pokes more than the front does, which was a surprise to me when I put on a square set of rims, or at least it did on my own car.


Like all things - What do you want to do with the car? This will determine what kind of fitment you really want. Talking 225 on 10's means I'm not the best person to advise as I am a more 265 at the front on a 9in rim kind of guy.

But making it fit is a question of maths and geometry really.

On 10/25/2018 at 8:35 AM, Kinkstaah said:

Your idea of 'fit' is different to others (and different to mine, which is also different to others)

10 +38 is a relatively common size at the rear of the R34.

With a square setup, the rear of the R34 pokes more than the front does, which was a surprise to me when I put on a square set of rims, or at least it did on my own car.


Like all things - What do you want to do with the car? This will determine what kind of fitment you really want. Talking 225 on 10's means I'm not the best person to advise as I am a more 265 at the front on a 9in rim kind of guy.

But making it fit is a question of maths and geometry really.

shit man, the coupe must be different to the sedan because im running 10.5 +25 on the rear and im about 7mm from touching the coilovers lol. +38 id have no chance.

 

i guess these things are best to just lie under the car with a tape measure

https://www.willtheyfit.com/index.php?width=265&aspect=35&diameter=18&wheelwidth=10&offset=38&width2=265&aspect2=35&wheel_size=18&wheel_width=10-5&offset2=25

 

According to this, it'd be 6.8mm closer to the suspension Strut. 

Note, did say 10 +38, not 10.5 +38. I had a 9.5 +27 on the back so I obviously had much more room on both sides.

On 10/24/2018 at 12:30 AM, Gazzaa said:

That doesn’t sound right for a 10.5. I’m not saying it’s impossible but the tyres would be completely stretched to their limits, plus with such a low sidewall, its not the correct fitment for a r34.

 

i have. 235/40 stretched over a 9.5 wheel up front

the 10.5 will 100% poke out but with a stretched 255/35 or 245/40 you might be in luck

it mostly comes down to ride height and your suspension set up 

 

this is how the 235/40 looks on the 9.5 (+20)

00045788-ED12-4CE7-9845-32227CC16CF9.jpeg

This is just my personal opinion but do not stretch your tires too much or else it makes the wheel look like hub caps. 

55 minutes ago, Robocop2310 said:

This is just my personal opinion but do not stretch your tires too much or else it makes the wheel look like hub caps.

As if that's the reason to not stretch like that!  How about driving on the sidewall?  Or loading the sidewall completely contrarily to how the engineer designed it to be loaded?  Or how about setting it up to be popped off the rim edge when you hit a rock?  Or completely defeating the point of rim protectors on the sidewall of the tyre?  Or ruining the dynamic performance of the tyre?

 

Edited by GTSBoy
7 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

As if that's the reason to not stretch like that!  How about driving on the sidewall?  Or loading the sidewall completely contrarily to how the engineer designed it to be loaded?  Or how about setting it up to be popped off the rim edge when you hit a rock?  Or completely defeating the point of rim protectors on the sidewall of the tyre?  Or ruining the dynamic performance of the tyre?

 

Well yes, and all that too! 

But my pet hate is “Stance nation” crazy camber. I just don’t get it.

16 hours ago, demiosdd said:

How about 18x9+40 245/40/18 all round 

The offset is too low for the front I believe.

Use the website willtheyfit and put in your current setup, get the measurements, grab a tape measure and see the difference for yourself.

1 hour ago, demiosdd said:

Yeah I don’t know the setup atm I want to run 18x9s all round if I can with out the wheel sticking out 

18x9 + 30 is what you’re after my friend

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...