Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

image.png.df8ffd5ac7c8926d59c6e200f5b9764d.pngimage.png.5f34321af892f180cf21406352e3ec28.png

Here's an example on my old rims, and yes in this photo the front is clearly higher than the rear as it's on a slope too.
That said, if the front was lower, it'd tuck further in, but I can't really find anything more conclusive. Clearly the above photos are gonna work if you're a coupe, and everything on the internet I have found says the front track is 10mm wider than the rear track on a 34 GTT.

So I could just be fkin wrong lol. However, I definitely don't need a spacer on the rear with a 9+30, so perhaps the coupe does have a little more space in the guards.

3 hours ago, Peache07 said:

I guess the rear quarters on the coupe poke out 10mm further than the sedan's rear quarters

I always thought the coupe rear guards were wider. 
I also had 2 different guard rollers tell me the sedan rear guards could be rolled but not pumped as it buckles the door latch and affects the rear door - unlike the coupe 

6 hours ago, Adz2332 said:

all this is doing is making me more confused over sedan 34 fitment haha

This has been my thoughts for the past few months looking at fitment hahah I thought I had it worked out but now I'm a bit confused again

17 hours ago, Peache07 said:

I avoided getting the 10 inch rear because I wasn't comfortable risking having to roll my guards so I got a square setup of 18x9 +30 and put an extra 5mm slip on hub centric spacer on the rear

I reckon it needs just about 2mm more on the rear to be perfect

My tyres are square too at 245/40/18

Hopefully one of these pictures gives you an idea of fitment

OOFT.thumb.jpg.d969456f1bb99353307d8d094fe9553a.jpg

364A6501.thumb.jpg.f3d01ab1bb6cf41b827b05ef8a22e1a3.jpg

IMG_20191213_174317.thumb.jpg.75233f37037d1b78331f5a1871b423e8.jpg

1905398587_IMG_20190519_084241resize.thumb.jpg.7ebfa55f7363d3eca8be7ba4d3e15463.jpg

52935259_IMG_20180213_174637.jpgresize.thumb.jpg.d3f8bbf4a50d953dcf02b18cafab6cce.jpg

IMG_20180120_120931.thumb.jpg.09bf6f23a30e25adbe58c68a9953f0f1.jpg

That helps heaps man thanks.

Putting it in a offset calculator going from 9+30 to 10+38: The wheel will extend (poke) out 5mm more. So that should put me into the same fitment as yours with the spacers. That decides it all for me.

18x9+30 Fronts

18x10+38 Rear

245/40/18 for the fronts and I guess I'll run like a 260 something on the rear.

Nice car as well. Like the look of more meat on the tyres opposed to the crazy stretch lots of people are rolling

  • Like 1
5 hours ago, Moshpit95 said:

That helps heaps man thanks.

Putting it in a offset calculator going from 9+30 to 10+38: The wheel will extend (poke) out 5mm more. So that should put me into the same fitment as yours with the spacers. That decides it all for me.

18x9+30 Fronts

18x10+38 Rear

245/40/18 for the fronts and I guess I'll run like a 260 something on the rear.

Nice car as well. Like the look of more meat on the tyres opposed to the crazy stretch lots of people are rolling

What style rim are you getting

Went and test fitted a 18x9.5 with a +20 offset on the rear of a r34 gtt coupe with coilovers, lowered but legal height and no guards rolled. Rims stuck out of the guard quite abit, so +20 is definitely a no go. 

 

Ordered for the front 18x8.5 +28 and for the rears18×9.5 + 35 

Unsure of the tyre size, most likely a 235/40/18 at the front and probably a 265/35/18 rear. Rota wheels expert who supposedly knows all about our cars, is going to call me on monday and recommend me either 18x10+35 or 18×9.5+35 with either 265 or 275 tyres on the rear.

  • 1 month later...

Hi, does anyone know if a 18x9.5 +22 265/35 square setup will fit a r34 gtt coupe?

I'm looking for a set of SSR GTX01 and I would like to run this size for the concave look. I don't like streched tires so thats why i chose 265/35 on a 9.5j

Hope anyone can help me.

Thanks!

6 hours ago, r34.bryan said:

Thanks for the info.

Would you reckon the same setup with +40 offset will fit? Or do I need to go to 18x8.5 in the front?

a 265 is far too big on the front and with a +40 offset you’ll likely have issues clearing suspension - especially on full lock.

 

8.5 is better if you don’t want stretch tyres, a 235 will fit nicely. +22, definitely not +40 or the wheel will be far too recessed inside the guards

265's can fit. I have them all round on an 18x9 +30.

They will pretty much only fit in that space. I also had them in the past with 18x9.5 +27 (because the tyre was mounted in the same spot, centrally speaking).

Mind you, you will want to roll guards, make sure your liners are absolutely clipped in, and potentially relocate the driver side loom under the right/driver side front quarter panel, because you can/will rub through it if your springs aren't ultra rock hard.

image.png.c354424278f78607a6a3b0f421208c87.png

 

image.png.a02402d06641a588cafc0aac6f12f95c.png

Will your life be a hell of a lot easier with a 8.5in rim and a 255? Yes.

 

Thanks for the replies.

Think I will go for

Front: 18x8.5 +44 (245/40)

Rear: 18x9.5 +40 (265/35)

I've compared this setup to some others and I think it will look good and clears fine.

I know +40 and +44 may seem like a high offset, but the rims I want jump from +22 to +40 on the 9.5j and +44 is minimum on 8.5j. Since the +22 will poke out I think the higher offsets will be better. I still need to measure for clearance on the suspension tho.

But like I said I've compared this setup to several others in this forum and it seems to fit fine.

That's because the +44 is for Subaru STI

I'd look at other options, there are wheels of similar style with Nissan RWD offsets.

* edit * looking at the Japanese SSR site

https://www.rd-tanabe.com/ssr/wp/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/GTX01_2020_spec.pdf

There is a 18x8.5 +38 option, which would be a tad better.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
    • I got adjustable after market rear camber arm to replace the stock one's because got sick of having to buy new rear tyres every few months. Can anyone please let me know what the best adjustment length would be. I don't have the old ones anymore to get measurements. I'm guessing the stock measurement minus a few mm would do it. Please any help on replacing them would be fantastic I've watched the YouTube clips but no-one talks about how long to set the camber arm to.
×
×
  • Create New...