Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

At the moment I am fairly confident the SS1PU is a Zingy'er turbo than the L2 20g is, based on the existing results filtering thought.

The SS1PU has shaped up to be a GTRS competitor with the prospects for more power should the setup allow for it, while the L2 20g is shaping up to be a true 2835 competitor (which is what some of us had always coined it to be..).

I guess this is where this thread would have ended up anyway lol

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

not an rb25 obviously but my old 32 gtr had 296kw at wheels...got bored of it after afew months, my mates would shit and seeing them get pushed back into the seat during acceleration was priceless haha

but i agree that around 280rwkw for a gtst street car would be mad fun and quick (with good tyres and width to put down of coarse)

Edited by SiR_RB

I'm confused OP - what are you trying to achieve?

There are soooo many variables especially with youtube videos etc of people doing "runs". One might get on the throttle earlier, be loading on the brakes, gear shift speed etc.

That all leads to "gaps" seeming to be a lot more (or a lot less) than they actually are. Tyres and suspension can make all sorts of differences as well.

I think the best reccommendation for anyone is simple - find someone and jump in their car. Get a feel for it yourself and gauge it from there as everyones perception of what is "acceptable" is different.

+1

Again, knowing how to keep it on the boil better will make the car feel a lot faster. Shifting at the right time, speed of your shifts, how early you get on the throttle in certain situations ETC. All counts.

Like I said, I convinced someone to buy my Disco despite the fact my car was the poorest example of what he should expect from it. I think his T25 180 would have been just as fast, hell civics were pulling on me down the main straight at wakefield. But its all perception at the end of the day, and that being said I dont think there is much to see from these sorts of videos.

But you should still buy the SS1PU champ :thumbsup:

I'm confused OP - what are you trying to achieve?

There are soooo many variables especially with youtube videos etc of people doing "runs". One might get on the throttle earlier, be loading on the brakes, gear shift speed etc.

That all leads to "gaps" seeming to be a lot more (or a lot less) than they actually are. Tyres and suspension can make all sorts of differences as well.

I think the best reccommendation for anyone is simple - find someone and jump in their car. Get a feel for it yourself and gauge it from there as everyones perception of what is "acceptable" is different.

I'm just trying to gauge from videos how much faster is a 300rwkw ride vs a 250-270 one - from takeoff to midrange to top end - just the differences. Haven't been lucky enough to find someone with a ride I can jump into.. Sikss2 was going to take me for a spin in his ss1PU car but then issues like weather, his car missing recently popped up. I think vs videos are a good way to help people gauge the differences - Roy's video on the kando thread of 3 skylines - 200, 260 and 310rwkws respectively running on a circuit was very good, the last 200rwkw skyline surprisingly kept up with the more poerful two esp on corners where it was closing in..

I'm just trying to gauge from videos how much faster is a 300rwkw ride vs a 250-270 one - from takeoff to midrange to top end - just the differences. Haven't been lucky enough to find someone with a ride I can jump into.. Sikss2 was going to take me for a spin in his ss1PU car but then issues like weather, his car missing recently popped up. I think vs videos are a good way to help people gauge the differences - Roy's video on the kando thread of 3 skylines - 200, 260 and 310rwkws respectively running on a circuit was very good, the last 200rwkw skyline surprisingly kept up with the more poerful two esp on corners where it was closing in..

The difference in terms of actual speed/distance is negligible man. I mean you're talking tens of a second. At Powercruise last year I raced a lot of different types of cars down the main straight when I had 330rwhp, the only car that really 'chopped' me was 440 Cuda and that thing is mental. I wasn't getting really badly beaten by a lot out there from the rolling starts, a cars length if that. Similar story between me and my mate when we hit Barbagallo last, I was making 393rwhp and he makes just over 320rwhp, I never really got away from him on the straight.

Roy's video was a good example of how 300rwkw wasn't reallyyyyy a lot faster than 250rwkw. Think about it. How much work goes into cars that run 10.1 seconds to get them into the 9 second bracket?

Edited by Hanaldo

I know there's obviously a heap of variables that people have already mentioned, but I can see where the op is coming from.

Being able to compare your 250kw hi flowed turbo setup to a 280-300kw aftermarket turbo setup on the road might help you decide if you want drop the $2500 to get the extra power.

But going for a drive in someone's would be the best option to compare power

is this where we hold a party all dropping our car keys in a bowl and go lucky dipping when about to drive home to experience a different ride...

oh wait thats a completely different thing isnt it...

I know there's obviously a heap of variables that people have already mentioned, but I can see where the op is coming from.

Being able to compare your 250kw hi flowed turbo setup to a 280-300kw aftermarket turbo setup on the road might help you decide if you want drop the $2500 to get the extra power.

But going for a drive in someone's would be the best option to compare power

Also comparing 250kw (thats well over 400hp btw) on a road with potholes and telephone poles and all sorts of other scary shit that can and will kill you or somebody close to you very very quickly and unexpectedly..

To having 250kw on a controlled skidpan, dragstrip or racetrack is again comparing apples with oranges..

Do you want a fast car? Or do you want a car that just feels fast and fun on the street? If the latter then running a smaller turbo (gt28, hypergear ss1pu etc) with big boost will result in the massive midrange kick that really makes a car feel fast on the street, on the track when you are at high rpm it won't be as quick as a laggier 300kw car.

I'm just trying to gauge from videos how much faster is a 300rwkw ride vs a 250-270 one - from takeoff to midrange to top end - just the differences. Haven't been lucky enough to find someone with a ride I can jump into.. Sikss2 was going to take me for a spin in his ss1PU car but then issues like weather, his car missing recently popped up. I think vs videos are a good way to help people gauge the differences - Roy's video on the kando thread of 3 skylines - 200, 260 and 310rwkws respectively running on a circuit was very good, the last 200rwkw skyline surprisingly kept up with the more poerful two esp on corners where it was closing in..

Say a 60km/h rolling start - all things being equal - there would be realistically stuff all in it with a 30rwkw variance.

Ye the high powered car would be faster, but you aren't talking an instant 2 car lengths or anything. You'd be lucky if the car with 30rwkw more, pulled more than a car length up to around 150km/h.

But - things aren't equal. It'll vary every single time, and that's all the videos will show you.

There are even other things to consider like the power delivery of the turbo etc. A poorly matched turbo making 280rwkw (say a GT35) will be slower than an appropriate turbo @ 280rwkw.

Too many variables dude.

Yeh you become used to the power extremely quickly.

That said, I'm only 2mph off a mates XR6T ute running 480rwhp.

A genuine 250rwkw in a GTST makes for a very fast street car, perfect for small spirited drives. I'm keen to push my GTRS up to around 1.3bar and see if I can reel off another 15rwkw. I'd be super happy then.

480RWHP XR6T and it's only running 113MPH?

There is something wrong there considering a stock XR6T with the right driver can rattle a high 12 out of one... And they only make 290KW at the fly (In the FG) and less in the older models...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...