Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry for being a smartarse (not) but those suspension rules could easily be tightened up eg by making it mandatory to use stock suspension points and no others. Quite easily done, people who write these rules are not very cluey sometimes..

If the MSPEED Gtr makes it.... WOW!

Why the Fck are ppl trying to prove that this car is a Open contender? It's Australia's fastest BNR chassis! Regardless of class, as half the open cars are quicker then pro anyway...It's the only thing that is remotely close to giving the EMOs and S-chassis's a run for there money.

It's not as quick yet, but if I was in a position to be invited as a PRO car and be recognized as a privateer doing it... Bring it on! Under Suzuki status :) Fck Open class

(what/whom are CNJ motorsport relative to the development of both cars? Always thought he owned it)

sorry...but no. If I was in that budget range I would have an AMG supertaxi and do 20 national rounds per year, or buy a carbon aston martin+ a tarmac rally R35 and do a varied range of events

Or maybe I would just invest the cash in beer and hookers.

Uncle Duncan...I think you are missing the point. If you have 1 million to sink into something then I am guessing you invest plenty of other cash in beer, coke and hookers. Have tarmac rally cars, a Carrera Cup car. Do whatever the hell you want most of the time that you are not stressing and busting your ass doing what got you the cash to blow in the first place.

What I cant excuse is wanting an R35! I thought you were better then that

Why the Fck are ppl trying to prove that this car is a Open contender?

It's a WTAC discussion thread, not proving anything, just having an interesting discussion around Marlins points & interpretations of rules is all?

That WTAC suspension rule must be last years, because the current rules say suspension is free in open class.

10. SUSPENSION

Open:

i. Suspension is free.

So yes the suspension is free... but...

10. SUSPENSION

c. Original mounting points may be reinforced and altered in design but not in location

(except Pro).

Would suggest that you can put any sort of suspension in, long as the Orig point is there.

Now as page 4 said - There are ways to read into that, give how open to interpretation it is... Probably update 1.3 coming soon to say you actually need to use the point rather than just have it there :rofl:

I didn't read the earlier part, but it doesn't matter because when you say something is free, you remove any restrictions on it. If they want Open cars to use original suspension mounting points, they fail at rule writing, which takes us back to my first post in this thread:

...they are still really crap at writing rules...

Edited by hrd-hr30

If the MSPEED Gtr makes it.... WOW!

Why the Fck are ppl trying to prove that this car is a Open contender? It's Australia's fastest BNR chassis! Regardless of class, as half the open cars are quicker then pro anyway...It's the only thing that is remotely close to giving the EMOs and S-chassis's a run for there money.

It's not as quick yet, but if I was in a position to be invited as a PRO car and be recognized as a privateer doing it... Bring it on! Under Suzuki status :) Fck Open class

(what/whom are CNJ motorsport relative to the development of both cars? Always thought he owned it)

I thought I made it clear enough in my original post re the Advan BNR34 that this was MY thought process, and wasn't at all trying to "prove" the car is anything? I know Mark wouldn't even WANT to go back to Open Class, not a chance in hell would he do that. I was merely putting it up for SAU discussion.

And CNJ are the guys who dyno tune the cars, not owners.

WTAC regs seem fickle and designed for a manufactured outcome. There are plenty of other time attack / time trial events which have been around for years before and will be after, with a long history of well defined and reasoanbly fair regs. Don't become enamoured by the hype, just vote with your feet.

The regs for the qld time attack series seem pretty good, maybe use those?

+1

And I reckon it's because they have been built on a sensible, not commercially driven basis, by people who know these sorts of cars.

Paul runs a good format for the qld time attack setup with any changes being of a minor nature to fine tune existing or accomodate new ideas.

The problem I see with wta is motivated by money. I have no objection to the organisers making squillions from their investment but in making rule changes that allow existing cars to run under the new regs at the exclusion if cars being currently built is a recipe for a shit storm.

  • 2 weeks later...

So Voltex Type-5 wing's are back in club and you can run a 600HP RB30 in your R32 GTST.

What you really want it a 600HP turbo S2000 running 295's all around. Light, short wheels base, wide track and massive power.

Doing time attack and then flying to melbs saturday night to go to Phillip island the next day.

Who among us is man enough for this ?

Where should we stay in melbourne ?

After seeing what you posted on facebook I am definitely not ma....gay enough to join you. :action-smiley-069:

  • 1 month later...

What the lightest factory weight of a r32 gtr? Is it 1400kg for the N1 or is there a lighter version produced?

I am trying to keep within the max of 20% reduction rule. I dont think I can get it but it will be good to know the actual target.

BTW what is the allowed weight for the Evo then? Obviously no one will use the Evo X since that is a baby whale when it comes to weight.

Also who else will be fighting for the Nissan badge? There seems to be some crazily fast Evo and Subies in the built also. It's going to be an interesting year.

Edited by 9krpm

So Voltex Type-5 wing's are back in club and you can run a 600HP RB30 in your R32 GTST.

What you really want it a 600HP turbo S2000 running 295's all around. Light, short wheels base, wide track and massive power.

The s2k is a bit deceiving and you will be surprised that is actually not the case. The s2000 is 1250kg from factory and I think that is dry weight. The track is not that wide either. Getting 600hp out of the f20c is easy but putting that power down will requires a lot of aero work. The only advantage is the suspension geometry is pretty good from stock but to compete at pro level it will be cheaper to build an evo or a nissan. At supersprint level then the gearbox and rear diff may not cope with significant power increase....I am not sure if the rule will allows use of other gearbox.

The s2k is a bit deceiving and you will be surprised that is actually not the case. The s2000 is 1250kg from factory and I think that is dry weight. The track is not that wide either. Getting 600hp out of the f20c is easy but putting that power down will requires a lot of aero work. The only advantage is the suspension geometry is pretty good from stock but to compete at pro level it will be cheaper to build an evo or a nissan. At supersprint level then the gearbox and rear diff may not cope with significant power increase....I am not sure if the rule will allows use of other gearbox.

100kg lighter than a GTST and has 300kg on a GTR.

with the introduction of those weight limits, a Datsun 1200, 120Y or similar featherweight 70's POS could be a good thing. A 1200 weighs 690kg standard - 20% = 552kg minimum weight in Pro... Any engine you want, any driveline, any suspension you can dream up...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The team at OBD2 Australia are pretty good, shoot them an email and ask them. I've dealt with them before for work stuff. I'd be shocked if it didn't work, so long as Consult can activate the ABS. But you might need to use KLine for it which would be the stopper, as I don't think that piece does KLine comms.
    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
×
×
  • Create New...