Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Which car is faster? I know the ford has more kw but is much heavier? I also heard the ford is easier to get power from.

Also my mate has one and wants to have a go against my gtst.

I don't have much on it, but here it is.

Front mount intercooler.

3inch exhaust piping (also noob question, when piping is all the way through does the stock cat still stay of aftermarket one replaces it. I can't tell if its stock or not. Or even if I have one, sorry not good with car mod details.)

K&N pod filter ( not sure if its part of an air jntake shstem or whatever I think the attached parts are stock.)

Atm turbos not boosted. Stock 7.

His car has air intake system and exhaust piping.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423898-r33-gtst-vs-ford-xr6-turbo-bf-model/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

From personal experience, I have an HR31 GTSX with a 25 and a new FG MarkII XR6T. As far as the engines go its a no brainer. The 4L does it so much easier. The car I test drive I gave a bit to for one hit and the things just go. It was auto, mine is manual and the thing hasnt seen half throttle yet. Its not so much the power difference but the torque is awesome for a stock car on I think 5psi. The 31 with some mods on 14psi has about the same rwkw as the stock xr6t but is lighter. The ford doesnt feel like a 1710kg car tho. Older versions have less power (240 kw) but your comparing a mid teenage car with a 2.5L to a car less than 10years old with a 4L. If your looking to mod think of it this way. Your exhaust, FMIC, intake, boost, fuel pump and injectors with a tune in a 33 will net you anywhere between 220-270rwkw with a hi flow turbo pending parts tune and how much your engine can take and u want to push. The ford with those mods minus the expense of the turbo will net you between 290-320rwkw and even more torque again.

I'd expect the XR6 to win

Edited by FordyR31

you guys got no idea....With 11psi and an exhaust I had no problems dusting off xr6t foulcans...add a few corners to the mix and the skyline is an easy winner..

Better yet run a 20 yr old skyline against a 20yr old ford and see who wins

The extra power of the Falcon will hand it the win for sure.

Also are there going to be any corners in this race? Because if there are the Falcon will still pwn the GTST, You would be surprised what an extra 10+ years of suspension development has done to newer cars.

you guys got no idea....With 11psi and an exhaust I had no problems dusting off xr6t foulcans...add a few corners to the mix and the skyline is an easy winner..

Better yet run a 20 yr old skyline against a 20yr old ford and see who wins

it doesn't count if they aren't racing you, lol.

Did some people ignore my post? I dont know any mildly modded 33's making 220+rwkw at 11psi. The BF Mark II especially had a pretty good change in the suspension area. My HR is lighter than a 33 and with the GT3076r and supporting mods on 14psi will probably keep up with the standard XR6T. Your comparing a car more modded than the original posters to a completely standard car. I read the original 33 in this post had stock boost aswell as mods listed and the xr6 had intake and exhaust mods. With those details in mind in the original post the original question can be answered not the "yeah but if it had this done" question.

Sorry to sound like an arse.

Edited by FordyR31

Stock low boost ford has no chance against a boosted rb 25.

Sorry Genelle, but No.

A skyline with FMIC, full 3" exhaust and extra boost will get hosed by a stock XR6T, especially if its an FG.

I have an FG, completely stock except for heavy as f**k 19" rims, cheap ass rear tyres, bodged the launch, and still ran a 13.005...

Rolling runs from 70KM/H no way will the 33 keep up...

Not to mention, change just the dump pipe on an R33 and tune it to suit (If you don't retune they won't really run as the ECU is very finicky) and you're now easily running flat 12s.

There is actually an FG dead stock running 12.2 down the quarter. Completely and utterly stock.

On the roll, especially with an auto, they're freaking QUICK cars. Punt it into a turn, sorry to say, but a fresh redo of the suspension (To standard) in an R33 will also get hosed by an XR6T, especially if you add water into the mix.

It's surprising how quick they are, even more so when you make all things equal.

As to the OP in question, I wouldn't bother wasting your fuel against him. You will lose unless he's a dunder clump that can't drive...

From personal experience, I have an HR31 GTSX with a 25 and a new FG MarkII XR6T. As far as the engines go its a no brainer. The 4L does it so much easier. The car I test drive I gave a bit to for one hit and the things just go. It was auto, mine is manual and the thing hasnt seen half throttle yet. Its not so much the power difference but the torque is awesome for a stock car on I think 5psi. The 31 with some mods on 14psi has about the same rwkw as the stock xr6t but is lighter. The ford doesnt feel like a 1710kg car tho. Older versions have less power (240 kw) but your comparing a mid teenage car with a 2.5L to a car less than 10years old with a 4L. If your looking to mod think of it this way. Your exhaust, FMIC, intake, boost, fuel pump and injectors with a tune in a 33 will net you anywhere between 220-270rwkw with a hi flow turbo pending parts tune and how much your engine can take and u want to push. The ford with those mods minus the expense of the turbo will net you between 290-320rwkw and even more torque again.

I'd expect the XR6 to win

FG XR6T runs 10PSi of boost, except under "Overtake" conditions, at which point it will run 11PSi, oh, and you'll know when you reach over take conditions, an extra 10% boost on the 4L is a lot more air flow.

BA and BF run 6PSi.

IIRC the Typhoon runs 12 or 13PSi standard.

Also to all of you comparing power, think of it this way, the XR6T redlines at just on 6Grand, standard making peak power at 5500RPM...

Convert your torque levels and the 4L is putting down roughly 20% more torque... And that is what wins a race.

Not to mention, when stock, an FG is making 553NM of torque at 2500RPM and holds that power flat to 5500RPM...

The figures I read must have been old then, explains some of the 30KW gain from a slightly smaller turbo between the BF and FG. Im trying to look after this car so wont be reaching this overtake mode for a while, im interested to know more about it. Also Launch control wont get a workout.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
×
×
  • Create New...