Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So where are these genuine T4 divided rears for GT35's? I can only find genuine divided T3 or crappy T4 divided ATP housings?

I was saying last night at our SAU meeting that someone was chasing a T4 rear... It was you :P I think Lithium had a heads up on where to find them?

Dumb - I went to get a link and realised it was only T3 divided, not that it should be a show stopper - but T4 would be more ideal due if nothing else to the commonality of T4 Divided "things".

I called GCG and apparently they only have non-genuine T4 Divided housings to suit GT35's.

Wouldn't recommend using them if you intend on pushing it at all

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

My mates Evo has run a few twinscroll HTA Turbos.

HTA3582R with 1.06 A/R Rear Housing - Made 450kW

HTA3586R with 1.06 A/R Rear Housing - Made 500kW

Difference is about 2-300RPM in spool.

The HTA3586R is the BEST all round forced performance turbo you can buy unless your running really big boost like 40+psi. But under 40psi, the HTA3586R will be more responsive and make similar power as the HTA3794R's.

I ALMOST went to a HTA3586R. But just didn't due to $$ that I was spending elsewhere on the car..

On a pissy 2 litre youd be right , on a Rb30 , the 3794 should walk away easy on less than 30psi i would have thought

I'd love to try a FP4294 or 3794 on a sohc, just the normal garret 4294 was a very good thing with a auto and

small 8.5 inch torque converter

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

On a pissy 2 litre youd be right , on a Rb30 , the 3794 should walk away easy on less than 30psi i would have thought

I'd love to try a FP4294 or 3794 on a sohc, just the normal garret 4294 was a very good thing with a auto and

small 8.5 inch torque converter

Yeah I reckon! The new Super94 (which basically outperforms the 3794/PT6766/pretty much any 67mm turbo in spool and flow apparently) is actually for sale for a REALLY reasonable price considering what it is capable of, here's hoping there are other turbine housings available on request for the bigger motor guys as the .85 seems a little small - though the Boostin Performance DSM trapped at 177mph so it would have to be putting out near >1000hp with the thing, so maybe the flow is suited and conventional wisdom could be overlooked in this instance:

ttp://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=NTFPSUPER94&Category_Code=Turbo-FP

I'd expect it would be totally streetable on a 3litre - imagine of street/drag weapon something like that could be? :wub:

here the link for the T4 TS housings for the GT35R 1.06A/R. I think the A/R is a bit big for me because im just chasing 400kw with something with reasonable response.

http://www.treadstoneperformance.com/product.phtml?p=1905&cat_key=595&prodname=Garrett+Turbine+Housing+T4+Divided+inlet+1.06+A%2FR+GT3582R

They are not very expensive aswell

Looks like an ATP housing, we were playing with a BW S300SX 8375 and a GT3582R (with ATP 1.06a/r T4 TS) housings a while ago comparing the general turbo stuff and there was a definite difference in quality etc - GT3582R on the right:

post-11136-0-84273000-1370490809_thumb.jpg

post-11136-0-27948200-1370490817_thumb.jpg

^ I think its got to do with the casting process and quality of steel used.

Yep - that is my understanding too. Here's one a 1.06a/r one from a E85 guzzling S15 race car from here which demonstrates what concerns me:

2011-11-17075840.jpg

2011-11-17075854.jpg

Anyone managed to find the T4 twin scrolls for the HTA3582 i would probably just bite the bullet and get one.??

http://www.streettunedmotorsports.com/parts/fp_hta_gt3582r_ball_bearing_turbo.htm

these guys offer t4 divided?

Thats the ful unit though im trying to source out a housing and maybe would make it cheaper because $2269. Is a lot and its not proven on RB25 though it has some serious potential packed

Thats the ful unit though im trying to source out a housing and maybe would make it cheaper because $2269. Is a lot and its not proven on RB25 though it has some serious potential packed

You know its going to make insane power and lag will be very little in comparison to equal sized turbos, the results would be the same sort as mine just on a higher scale!

the price is what is holding me back but if i get a fat tax back this is what im getting. if its not as i like resale shouldnt be hard with a few hundred off the price

Depends on where you want to compromise and what you think you will get the most reward from, you can definitely save a reasonable amount of money and still get respectable performance - however with this there is less risk you are going to look back and think... Maybe this could be better, but now I have spent the money.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The prices I’ve heard aren’t that bad 
    • Oh, I also meant to say that it is possible to use a venting BOV and restrict its outlet down so that it does vent enough to prevent the sututu, but vents slowly enough that the AFM doesn't see all the air at once and makes it easier to avoid stalling.
    • I'll go talk to my bank manager. Either that or my nearest western Sydney drug baron.
    • Driveability will be about the same with either externally venting BOV, or no BOV at all. Perhaps worse one way than the other, with me thinking that the definitely more flow going through the AFM through a venting BOV more likely to cause rich stalls than the perhaps more flow that the AFM might read on reversion. There is no such thing as "turbo damage" from not having a BOV at stock, or even quite a lot higher than stock, power levels. You need a big turbo with a lot of mass spinning hard getting a horrible slowdown from a slammed shut throttle before there is anything like the shaft loads required to damage things. Not an issue on small turbos. The ONLY 2 reasons that Nissan put a recirc valve onto the RB were: It is a bypass valve. It is open when under vacuum. When not on boost, it bypasses intake air forward around the compressor, which unloads the compressor, allowing the turbine to sping more freely, making the whole lot a bit more efficient when just puddling around. Throttle response should also be faster via the shorter, smaller diameter BOV pipe (when in NA, ie before the BOV closes and boost is building) which is nicer for driveability. Emissions. The reversion causes CO pulses. Eliminate the reversion (or at least, keep it away from the AFM) and you don't get that. The stalling/driveability aspect could have been tuned around, as shown one example of by dose above, if Nissan hadn't put a recirc valve on. Many many turbo engines before the RB had no BOV. They did not stall. See the RB30 turbo as an example. Nistune is definitely better than just stock ECU. It allows you to access and change things that are not excellent on the stock setup, and allows you to do mods like put decent injectors in, relocate the AFM, put a bigger turbo or even cams, etc, on, change to coil swith completely different swell needs, etc etc. All the things that you might need or want to do 25 years after the car was new. Aftermarket replacement ECU is obviously better again, because it gives you even more freedom from the constraints of the stock ECU. I won't be needing to go any further than Nistune though, for the new turbo in the 250ish rwkW region I'm going to, with big injectors, and most other things being stockish.
    • Lucky the prp block is supposed to be released next weekend 
×
×
  • Create New...