Jump to content
SAU Community

Forced Performance Hta Turbos


Recommended Posts

So where are these genuine T4 divided rears for GT35's? I can only find genuine divided T3 or crappy T4 divided ATP housings?

I was saying last night at our SAU meeting that someone was chasing a T4 rear... It was you :P I think Lithium had a heads up on where to find them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dumb - I went to get a link and realised it was only T3 divided, not that it should be a show stopper - but T4 would be more ideal due if nothing else to the commonality of T4 Divided "things".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called GCG and apparently they only have non-genuine T4 Divided housings to suit GT35's.

Wouldn't recommend using them if you intend on pushing it at all

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mates Evo has run a few twinscroll HTA Turbos.

HTA3582R with 1.06 A/R Rear Housing - Made 450kW

HTA3586R with 1.06 A/R Rear Housing - Made 500kW

Difference is about 2-300RPM in spool.

The HTA3586R is the BEST all round forced performance turbo you can buy unless your running really big boost like 40+psi. But under 40psi, the HTA3586R will be more responsive and make similar power as the HTA3794R's.

I ALMOST went to a HTA3586R. But just didn't due to $$ that I was spending elsewhere on the car..

On a pissy 2 litre youd be right , on a Rb30 , the 3794 should walk away easy on less than 30psi i would have thought

I'd love to try a FP4294 or 3794 on a sohc, just the normal garret 4294 was a very good thing with a auto and

small 8.5 inch torque converter

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a pissy 2 litre youd be right , on a Rb30 , the 3794 should walk away easy on less than 30psi i would have thought

I'd love to try a FP4294 or 3794 on a sohc, just the normal garret 4294 was a very good thing with a auto and

small 8.5 inch torque converter

Yeah I reckon! The new Super94 (which basically outperforms the 3794/PT6766/pretty much any 67mm turbo in spool and flow apparently) is actually for sale for a REALLY reasonable price considering what it is capable of, here's hoping there are other turbine housings available on request for the bigger motor guys as the .85 seems a little small - though the Boostin Performance DSM trapped at 177mph so it would have to be putting out near >1000hp with the thing, so maybe the flow is suited and conventional wisdom could be overlooked in this instance:

ttp://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=NTFPSUPER94&Category_Code=Turbo-FP

I'd expect it would be totally streetable on a 3litre - imagine of street/drag weapon something like that could be? :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here the link for the T4 TS housings for the GT35R 1.06A/R. I think the A/R is a bit big for me because im just chasing 400kw with something with reasonable response.

http://www.treadstoneperformance.com/product.phtml?p=1905&cat_key=595&prodname=Garrett+Turbine+Housing+T4+Divided+inlet+1.06+A%2FR+GT3582R

They are not very expensive aswell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like an ATP housing, we were playing with a BW S300SX 8375 and a GT3582R (with ATP 1.06a/r T4 TS) housings a while ago comparing the general turbo stuff and there was a definite difference in quality etc - GT3582R on the right:

post-11136-0-84273000-1370490809_thumb.jpg

post-11136-0-27948200-1370490817_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ I think its got to do with the casting process and quality of steel used.

The Tial housings dont seem too bad...seem to flow + spool better then the traditional T3.. not TS though..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ I think its got to do with the casting process and quality of steel used.

Yep - that is my understanding too. Here's one a 1.06a/r one from a E85 guzzling S15 race car from here which demonstrates what concerns me:

2011-11-17075840.jpg

2011-11-17075854.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats the ful unit though im trying to source out a housing and maybe would make it cheaper because $2269. Is a lot and its not proven on RB25 though it has some serious potential packed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats the ful unit though im trying to source out a housing and maybe would make it cheaper because $2269. Is a lot and its not proven on RB25 though it has some serious potential packed

You know its going to make insane power and lag will be very little in comparison to equal sized turbos, the results would be the same sort as mine just on a higher scale!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the price is what is holding me back but if i get a fat tax back this is what im getting. if its not as i like resale shouldnt be hard with a few hundred off the price

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the price is what is holding me back but if i get a fat tax back this is what im getting. if its not as i like resale shouldnt be hard with a few hundred off the price

Depends on where you want to compromise and what you think you will get the most reward from, you can definitely save a reasonable amount of money and still get respectable performance - however with this there is less risk you are going to look back and think... Maybe this could be better, but now I have spent the money.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...