Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All the air the engine consumes must come through the comp wheel. If the comp wheel can only flow "x" amount of air, that volume wouldn't change, or would it?

All being equal ( cams comp ratio etc etc ) a 2.6 will consume less air then a 3.0 which means the same turbo would have to spin faster to hold the same boost level on a 3.0, so while a comp wheel can only flow so much air the different size engine will pass more air

Which is the issue I'm having, 28psi through a 3.0 is to much air flow for the GT28 turbine side to pass creating to much backpressure

  • 2 weeks later...

So a new late model EVO record has been set today - STM in the US raced their EVO 8 RS drag car which runs a .85a/r T3 Super 99 HTZ at Maryland International Raceway and started out the day running a loose 8.7 @ 181mph and gradually whittled the times down, first breaking the 4 year old record of 8.34 @ 169mph with a 8.28 @ 178mph - then taking it further down with a 8.09 @ 182.5mph with a 1.4s 60ft. It has definite 7s power, just needs to hook a bit better but probably less and less likely with the temps dropping quickly over in the US.

>180mph on a T3 turbo.... there are a lot of people who raise eyebrows at some of the dyno figures thrown around for some of these turbos, but that is HAULING!

  • Like 3
  • 2 months later...

Sorry to wake this thread up, just finished reading it all and have to say thanks for the information.

Has any of the builds in progress from last year come to any results?

Has anyone got specific results on rb25 hta3076 with hydraulic head?

Cheers

Sorry to wake this thread up, just finished reading it all and have to say thanks for the information.

Has any of the builds in progress from last year come to any results?

Has anyone got specific results on rb25 hta3076 with hydraulic head?

Cheers

Mines still coming along. Not too long it should be running but ive said that a few times now.

post-7636-0-04426000-1423559888_thumb.png

Sorry to wake this thread up, just finished reading it all and have to say thanks for the information.

Has any of the builds in progress from last year come to any results?

Has anyone got specific results on rb25 hta3076 with hydraulic head?

Cheers

Mine is still kicking :woot:

Looking forward to your results Brad. Even though my love for FP is all but gone :(

No FP love? :(

Dodgy designed turbo leaks oil like a tanker.

They won't warrant it as they dont make them anymore and they flat out blame the oil leaks on crank case pressure not their product.

Its a well known thing about them in the evo world.

I know of 4 other people with this issue with as little as 1500km on their turbos. Took my stock turbo to be modified at GT PUMPS & he currently has 4 of them that are leaking oil the only fix is to convert them to Journal bearing.

I spent $2700 on a turbo that done 3000km and isnt worth its weight in scrap :(

VERY disappointed as it took them months to build it and its f**ked in less time than it took to be built :(

Oh wow!

Never heard of that :domokun:

Sorry to hear mate... But at least you share your experience for others to see... I think FP are amazing based on my experience alone but its good to see both sides of the coin especially if people are looking to buy the same thing!

Thanks Matt oh well live and learn mate. I did love the turbos performance which is why it sucks so much!

It only seems to be a stock frame Mitsubishi issue.

The evo turbos they build run their own custom dual ceramic ball bearing cartridge which is the flop.

But turbos like Matts yeah they are a modified garrett basically with the HTA comp wheel :)

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453377-evo-9-turbo-kit-sydney/

Edited by Mick_o

Sounds like its isolated to just that style of turbo :( Dissapointing to say the least mate!

I wouldnt hesitate to buy another one through them due to my experience, but sucks to hear you had issues!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...