Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys my r32 gtr sits around 1/4 on the torque gauge when crushing around 100kms my gtr in NZ and my old gts4 didn't do this unless I had different size tyres on the rear !!

I removed the 4wd controller it had in it and still is sending power when light throttle on the Hilway ??

Any ideas ??

Cheers

Havent checked fault codes yet about to do that now>

Does it return to 0 when you lift off? Probably mismatched rolling diameters.

yip returns to 0 when back off, and I checked tyre pressures and pumped up to a nice firm 38psi 235/40/r18 all round, it does have 10inch wide on the rear and 9"on front.

the same thinig happened to my gtr in nz when had 18's on front and gtr 16s on rear

why does my previous 2 4wd skylines r32 gts4 and my other gtr in nz it would read 0 unless under bumpy roads or accerating or sliping, while cruising at 105kms.

Edited by Tabs

Wrong.

R32 = no preload

R33/34 = preload

No?

OP - it should only send power to the front under heavy acceleration or slip. You're probably wearing it out driving it like that.

yeah im turning key off-on most the time ( put in rwd mode till come to a stop ) to prevent extra wear plus extra fun of rwd :devil:

I have a power fc ecu would that effect the tps for the 4wd??? fi adjusted tps from .9 to .48v

putting the 4wd in diagnostics do you have to turn a screw like the engine ecu or something??

with reds on no led on ecu in the boot (passenger side)

Wrong TPS value can cause shenanigans. It absolutely should be less then 0.5v at closed throttle.

Just google the procedure to put it into diagnostics, or look in the GTR manual. Or, take it to a mechanic who has a good scan tool and just hook it up and surf around in the computers. Much easier.

If you have 10in at the rear and 9in at the front the the rolling circumference will be different - the 40 in the size is a ratio not a height and so they will have different heights.

That tyre size is too narrow for one. I had exact same problem when I put bigger tyres on the rear of my car. Try a different set of wheels if you can, one with same sizes all round.

But, do a diag first (I'm sure there's a procedure around here).

Wrong.

How am I wrong?

Sorry didn't notice that you had the same tyres on different rims. Your rear tyres are illegal in NZ. Minimum for 9in is 235 ( I have 255s on mine) and minimum for 10in is 255 and ideally should be 265 or 275.

If you want to keep the tyres get a set of 4 8in rims or else ditch the lot and start again.

No it shouldn't. It should be 0 until the car detects slip.

Check tyre pressures.

Wrong.

R32 = no preload

R33/34 = preload

No?

OP - it should only send power to the front under heavy acceleration or slip. You're probably wearing it out driving it like that.

Clearly there is some contention about how much front wheel torque is supplied at cruising speed. I have found in the 32's I have run that there is a little supplied at about 100km/h. So I dont think any fault codes will show and I dont reckon there to be anything wrong with the system. AFAIK the attessa works in conditions other than large front/rear wheel speed differentials.

Yes that is true. But the small amount of front torque doesn't register on the gauge. Unless my ATTESSA is not working as well as it should, hence my question of how am I wrong to say that the needle should be at 0 until the car decides to send torque to the front wheels. I may sound like a dick online, but it's a genuine question lol.

When I had 245/40 front and 245/45 rear tyres, every bump sent the gauge to ~10. I had to lift off so it would relax down to 0 again.

Bit off topic, with the R33/R34 GT-R's, does the torque gauge read 0 during cruise, even though there is preload on the front wheels?

235/40/r18 all round, it does have 10inch wide on the rear and 9"on front.

the same thinig happened to my gtr in nz when had 18's on front and gtr 16s on rear

How many f*****g times do we have to state that you need same size tyres on same size rims on all 4 corners?

Stretching a 235/40 tyre onto a 10" rim will force the rolling circumference of that tyre to be smaller than a 235/40 on a 9" rim. Result = ATTESA chaos.

The added advantage of this setup is that you can easily even out tyre wear by swapping F<>R at regular (say 5k) intervals.

Yes the R32's system works in conditions other than simply wheel speed difference, but cruising at 100 under light load, nope.

Moderate acceleration without rear wheel slip will show some front torque due to the "G" sensor input.

But as for tyre sizing, I can't understand what's so hard to understand.

Forget theoretical rolling diameters, get the bloody tape out and check circumferences.

It's surprising how similar looking tyres can still be quite different in circumference.

Put the small ones on the front.

And read up on the manual, it's all in there.

Thanks for above comments

I agree with no preload and should read around 0 when crusieing at 100k

Also makes sense about 235 stretched on 10" rims personally I got the car like that and have been destroying the tread to get better tyres as they are a shit compound and I'd perfer stock gtr r32 rims or after r34 gtr rims bbs rims with gold don't do it for me despite what my mates recon thru are worth and how awesome they recon they look !!

Factory gtr rims here I come !!!

There's a sweet little thing called logic;

Sending power to the front when your rears are slipping = sensible, since your rear wheels are slipping...

Sending power to the front when you're accelerating hard = sensible, since your rears maybe be about to break traction because your accelerating hard

Sending power to the front when you're cruising at speed = no apparent benefit, so why do it? They don't do it, except for the preload. They noticed that the R32 system didnt react as quickly as they'd like, so its a bit of a hack to reduce latency. You dont see pre-load on the gauge tho, because its so close to zero.

FWIW, i've never noticed the torque gauge being non zero when cruising.

Yes the R32's system works in conditions other than simply wheel speed difference, but cruising at 100 under light load, nope.

Moderate acceleration without rear wheel slip will show some front torque due to the "G" sensor input.

But as for tyre sizing, I can't understand what's so hard to understand.

Forget theoretical rolling diameters, get the bloody tape out and check circumferences.

It's surprising how similar looking tyres can still be quite different in circumference.

Put the small ones on the front.

And read up on the manual, it's all in there.

I've done a lot of messing around the G-Sensor - for sure, if it's not calibrated, it will cause what you are seeing. I've even done it deliberately for some tests. Although if it's as bad as you say, I would expect it to throw an error.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...