Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Great read, though I'm hanging out for an open deck RB25! :yes:

In a Stagea block? The main reason for doing the open deck engines is to get better fitment than an RB30 block, but if you don't have to worry about retaining AWD, the RB30's are easier to work with.

The VCT can be transplanted to an Rb26 head too, although it also occurred to me that I could make the spacer plate to adapt between a 26 block and a RB25 neo head. Then plumb in the oil for the VCT to the side of the plate for VCT like I already do for head oil supply on this engine.

Then I guess there is only the matter of getting a side mount plenum and it would fit a GTR still.

Reasoning for using Greddy plenum? I have always liked them...but guessing your reasoning may be more measured????

Partly for more volume, partly for the second set of injector bosses, and also so I can balance the intake throttles independently using an old school airflow balance meter.

In hindsight I should have gone with a Nismo one, or gone stock. It was a pain in the ass to get it in there with the extra 10mm height this engine has (in its fitted position). Clutch master cylinder to plenum clearance was non existent until I lowered the engine a little.

Second shake-down drive today. Performed flawlessly. :)

Still having to re-work the fuel map a bit, but I have the drive on load area's pretty good now. All going well and weather permitting I'll be going for a sunday drive to put a couple of hundred k's on it.

I was able to take a few photos outside of a garage today too.

post-26553-0-85671300-1387448359_thumb.jpg

post-26553-0-31834600-1387448426_thumb.jpg

post-26553-0-18360500-1387448476_thumb.jpg

post-26553-0-58201500-1387448539_thumb.jpg

I had to read you post about your breather system again after looking at the photo, I thought it read you where trying to vacuum out of the cam covers, oh god no, then after looking at the photo and rereading it I see what you've done, should work very well, a great idea, in the baffling in the camber on the block have you got any gauss/foam/steel wool to "catch" fine air born oil particals

500rwkws is easily achieved with a 2.6 with this turbo and head setup, I would think the idea of this engine is to do it as low in the rev range with as wide as possible power band and least amount of stress on internals as possible

I am keeping a very close eye on this, like the last one, cause as I have nearly completed a RB30 based build and I am not entirely happy with fitment

I love the colour on your car, it is what I wanted but my BB one came up at a price I couldn't let go

Thanks for the positive replies everyone.

I was able to go for a bit of a drive today, and have so far put about 300km on the new engine. It is awesome to drive, with amazing low end grunt. The only quirt I've noticed is that while it has enough torque to drive at 1700-1800 rpm in 5/6 gears, the roughness of the cams don't make it a smooth drive.

Keeping revs below 4000 is a challenge, as it seems to want to achieve wastegate boost at 3600. Ive had to lower 10 degrees of ignition out of the map so as to reduce torque should boost get to high.

I've got to do something about the noise too. Considering trying an Apexi slip in active silencer to try and curb the drone and bark of it a little.

Edited by GTRNUR

I'm driving the car every day again now in order to clock up some KM and put the engine through some heat cycles. There is a little over 450km on the engine now and it is continuing to make me smile every time I drive it.

I've got the low end tune to about 80% to perfect, and as a result the throttle response is purely ballistic now. To give you an idea, it will chirp the wheels if you tap the throttle too quickly when idling along in a car park.

The boost response with the 6466 is extremely impressive. It actually achieves wastegate boost quicker than a stock turbo'd GTR does. With moderate loads and driving gently, it makes 0.3kg/cm at 2000 RPM. At 2400, its at about 0.5kg/cm and 1kg/cm at about 3000 RPM. Then you have to ease off the throttle or it will threaten to rev past 4 in the blink of an eye. The twin gates currently have 18lb springs installed, and both gates open at only 3400RPM!

Its going to be interesting to see what kind of top end the engine will deliver. It seems I could have gone with a 6766 or even larger, and still had ballistic response.

That's all for now..

post-26553-0-41027700-1388308672_thumb.jpg

Well it turns out that its even more responsive than I had thought.

The attached picture shows a screen shot of a drive I did today while data logging. 1.3kgcm is the 20K load scale. Full boost was achieved at 3200 rpm. This was the first time I have held it flat in 5th gear to properly load it up, other occasions had been about 3/4 throttle. As you can see from this screen shot, at 3200 its on.

I think it will be capable of pumping 25psi by 3500 from the looks of this, which means I will be very close to achieving my low end power goal of 300kw @ 4000 rpm.

I tried making a drive video today too but my camera it didn't turn out. I need to buy a go pro.

post-26553-0-01005100-1388658222_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...