Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive just launched my std turbo on my M35.

What are the current upgrades , given that i'm not planning on going major on the mods. I'd like more boost, but not a laggy pig either!

Do i just get a high flowed std turbo, like http://www.digi-hardware.com/m35highflow.htm , or a new unit ? Any recommendations ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/442392-m35-turbo-upgrade/
Share on other sites

If you aren't planning on tuning the ecu via the Emanage ultimate or Fcon at some point, stick with as close to stock sized as possible. The G1 profile for $880 is a good deal, or a Sierra stage 1 some other builders use. You will notice lag either way, as the wheel is steel, not ceramic, but it shouldn't be to bad if you keep them close to stock sized.

Where are you located Mark? The part you should be more worried about is who is doing the swap...

What was the specs on the presicion turbo Dale ?.

Not sure on the emanage/fcon upgrade yet Scotty. I do all the work on my cars. (mechanic +22 yrs) this one wil be a challange, but i'm sure i'll manange with it. ( & swear a bit..)

Looks like i might have to fab up a new intake whilst i'm there. Bit of work to do & Loads of room to work on ! (lol).

There seems to be a few oil feed mods to do as well. What's involved with that ?

Thanks for your help gents !

I'm interested in this also. I have a spare stock M35 turbo to send off to Hypergear this week sometime and am trying to decide which option to go.

I have an emanage ultimate and Greddy Profec sitting next to the turbo that will be fitted at the same time so i'm leaning towards buying injectors and bigger fuel pump as they will peak out around the 200kw mark.

Stao from Hypergear recommends either the G2 highflow (rated up to 240kw on 98 pump) assuming you plan to add injectors, pump, emanage etc. He also put the SS2 profile on the table as well which will produce 270kw but i'm still looking for dyno results as lag is my concern also. I'm coming from a 240kw R33 so i'm looking for something similar (auto aside) from my M35.

At this stage the G2 is looking the goods for me.

  • Like 1

I also went with a high flow by Precision(same as Daleo) but went with an SS1. For me I was after nice low down responsive power. It is still slightly lagier then stock. But hardly noticable. But the power delivery and increased high end power is very noticable. I will shortly be installing 1000cc injectors a bigger fuel pump and an Adaptronic ECU along with a couple more bits and pieces, At which time i will upload results for everyone to see. My goal is to have very minimal lag.

Edited by Brick
  • Like 1

i got the hypergear SS2 with billet front wheel, and boy was it laggy driving it home from the workshop.

As scotty said if not tuning stick to as close to stock as possible.

And if tuning look into getting the wastegate bored out bigger and getting scottys waste gate actuator.

  • 1 month later...

Gday All,

Ive just been reading through this thread for my mate Lenny whos bought an M35. Hes keen to do a few performance mods but its hard to find info on these cars.

So far he has:

-made a less restrictive intake

-made a replacement stainless turbo intake elbow (less bendy and restrictive than stock)

-chucked on a hks frontmount (came off an evo, and fitted right on!).

Next up old mate will be building a 3 inch stainless exhaust, he would like to increase the boost or upgrade turbo if possible.

So I guess we will need to look at turbos available and also an ecu to support it, Ive read the threads whats the general consensus for an ecu upgrade?

I run a GT2871 on my RB20det cefiro but reckon that would be too small for the Stagea, Im guessing something about a GT3071 as its a 2.5L, does this sound about right?

Next question, is anybody running this and how much hassle was it?

thanks for any help,

Agent A31

Edited by AgentA31

See the preceding posts for ideas on turbos. The problem with ecus is the auto so you have really to piggyback something on to the stock ecu.

The Greddy E-manage is relatively cheap, anyone should be able to tune it and you may be able to find an adapter loom for it.

The HKS F-Con is a better unit but it is more expensive and few tuners have the software to tune it - looms are available if hard to find.

Then you can put anything else on you like - Link, Adaptronic? (ref the previous post) etc but that is a more expensive option and will probably have to be hand grafted into the loom.

I run a GT2871 on my RB20det cefiro but reckon that would be too small for the Stagea, Im guessing something about a GT3071 as its a 2.5L, does this sound about right?

Next question, is anybody running this and how much hassle was it?

How much coin does he have to blow? Not many of us running aftermarket turbo's, most are happy with a highflow for less headaches. Have you even seen how hard it is to get to?

  • 1 year later...
  • 3 months later...

So the time has come for an upgrade, would like to get roughly 290-300kw atw on 98pump with as decent spool/response time as i can get (yes i know pushing shit up hill lol) I believe i have all the supporting mods ready to go atm apart from injectors and obvious fabrication to fit the turbo in. I have included the mamba turbos because of price im open to other options.The EFR turbos are a bit more expensive but seem to be the goods. Im leaning towards the GTX3071R with a .82 or .63 A/R but would also like to see what the EFR7163 would be like! from the looks of things the GTX would hit full boost round 4000rpm with the .82 at a guess? the EFR with the lighter wheel maybe a few 100 rpm sooner? And space would be a limiting factor of course. the EFR Is of similar size to the GTX in circumference just a bit longer so that could be an issue. Any input or thoughts/suggestions would be appreciated!

EFR7064
70mm compressor (exducer)
52.2mm compressor (inducer)
64mm turbine
300-550hp
.85 A/R
ewg or iwg
EFR7163
71mm compressor (exducer)
57mm compressor (inducer)
63mm turbine
300-550hp
ewg or iwg
.85 A/R
ewg or iwg
GTX3071R
71.4mm compressor (exducer)
54.1mm compressor (inducer)
60mm turbine
340-560hp
.82 0r .63 A/R
ewg or iwg
GTX3076R
76.6mm Compressor (exducer)
58mm compressor (inducer)
60mm turbine
360-640hp
.82 0r .63 A/R
ewg or iwg
Mamba GTX3071R
71mm compressor (exducer)
53.1mm compressor (inducer)
60mm turbine
380-480hp
.82 0r .63 A/R
ewg or iwg
Mamba GTX3076R
76.6mm compressor (exducer)
58mm compressor (inducer)
60mm turbine
350-550hp
.82 0r .63 A/R
ewg or iwg
Edited by Reprieve

I would like to go external gate but I'm not opposed to going internal. The gtx looks like it will fit in close to stock location so if I went the gtx way I'd probably put it there, but other than that maybe remove air box lol?

Did you see my GTX install pics from 4-5 years ago? The GTX 3076 fits, but only just, and that was the external gate housing. Think 'Ship in a bottle' it wasn't an easy fabrication by any means.

Let me know if you can't find the thread as I should still have some pictures saved somewhere.

No, too damn laggy. :P I have tried a few 3071's, now i'm helping design a highflow to suit the stock converter and still flow close to 300kw on e85.

The Garrett would be fine with a high stall converter, (just ask Alex who bought my setup) but realistically a highflow will produce enough torque these days to toast your gearbox, without the need to rev it to 8k.

Unless you have full standalone control none of this is a good option, you running the Fcon?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • hello! does anyone have a schematic that shows how to test the blower motor resistor for the vac system? i believe the part# is 27761-15U00. I think the resistor is toast, but would like to be able to test it somehow before i embark on the journey to find a new one. cheers! 27761-15U00
    • I don't know the answer to this, but did you have a look at the parts diagrams on amayama.com and see what they list around it for your car? As an example this should be it on my car. That's how I would check for required clips and things like that. But, I take no responsibility for you ending up with a box full of random OEM hoses, washers and clips after going down that path a few times. This definitely has never happened to me  
    • Most driving should* be done on one side of single lane divided roads. In the RHD world, you drive on the left side of the dividing line and the road is probably cambered equally on both sides. So your side of the road slopes away to the left. The same is true for the LHD world, just everything swapped to the other side and opposite slope. With a perfectly neutral, straight ahead wheel alignment designed to drive straight on a perfectly flat surface (or at least one that is level on the left-right axis, even if it has some slope in the fore-aft axis) you will not be able to drive on a cambered road without the car wanting to drift down the camber. You will need to add steering input in the opposite direction all the time. This is annoying. The solution has always been to set the camber and/or the caster to produce a continuous turning force in the opposite direction of the camber. The car will drive straight on the kind of camber for which it was set up, presumably as described in the top paragraph. But.... when the car is set up this way, as soon as you get into a lane, usually on a multi-lane surface road or highway, where the camber is not as presumed during setup, the car will usually pull to one side. In the RHD world, if you are in the fast lane on a big divided road, you are probably on the opposite camber compared to what the car was set up for (ie, sloping down to the right) and the combination of the setup and that camber will make the car want to go right pretty hard. Even a perfectly flat lane will tend to want to go right. There's no getting around it. Civil engineers who know their stuff (which is not an assumption that can always be made) will attempt to keep the variation in camber across a multi-lane road as small as possible, and if they can will attempt to make the fast lane as close to flat, or even cambered in the same direction as all the other lanes. This takes a lot of planning for drainage, control of levels, ability to deal with the elevation changes that occur at road junctions, etc etc. So it's not trivial to get it right. When they do make it work, then the annoyance is reduced, along with tyre wear, fuel consumption, etc. In theory, the civil engineers are supposed to worry about those aspects of road design also. * This used to be true, but now with very large highway systems, even just multi-lane surface roads running everywhere, it is less true now than it was, but the old assumption is the basis for describing the phenomenon, so let's just run with it for the moment.
    • I think the consensus was that's normal. Sloped road surfaces or something? I remember @silviaz went through this before. It might be one of those things you never notice until you pay attention to it.
    • Im not entirely sure exactly what or where its leaking from, he started to pull the boots to swap to my new tie rods + ends and it just vomited fluid, so he closed em up up, swapped the rod ends to the old rods and let me know so I can figure a solution out, im guessing its all origional as as I passed 103k miles earlier this year im sure its just in need of a full overhual/rebuild anyways.    If i could just yank it off and be good it wouldn't be an issue to ship it out and wait for the turnaround but the guy I work with doesnt really have space to keep my car for a week or two at a time, would rather drop it off and have a replacement ready to drop in
×
×
  • Create New...