Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Don't know why you would run the risk.. Walbros are like $200

Piecing this thing together over the last 4 years I need to put numbers onto paper, both pumps are bran new and would have seen less that 10 hours of use. Even if these pumps dont have a long life on e85 Id say ill get a tune and weekend driving for 3 mounths out of them, then its back in the shed for winter upgrades.

Just found this interesting clip on the Fuelab 42402 pumps with the 52902 electronic regulators, nice to see a integrated package now, just set the base fuel pressure and walk away, no fiddling with fuel pump controllers or ECU, no more hot fuel for systems without a pump controller.

  • Like 2

That is well worth taking 3 minutes to watch, thanks Peter.

Interesting seeing the foaming that happens, mainly at low tank levels. It's part of the reason I was looking at the Holley Hydramat intank, rather than a surge setup. Not sure I can get it to work with the twin Walbros of course, they seem to only use AN fittings.

  • Like 1

Thats very interesting Scotty, never knew it existed, looks very promising.

Back to traditional fuel surge tanks and the fuelab clip, the air issue certainly opened my eyes and had me rethink surge tank designs. (and your mat discovery brings out feed design improvements)

Most surge tanks have the main pump feed outlet/s down the bottom, on the very top a return to the feed tank and a little down from the top the return line from the fuel pressure reg and tank feed input.

I was thinking to maybe get something else made up....

A tall cylinder, all inlets one one side entering at 45 degrees, pump outlet/s right opposite also at 45 degrees.

The idea being that anything entering all comes from one side of the cylinder to get the fuel rotating in the cylinder, in effect creating a vortex, much like those swirl pot air/oil separators.

Main fuel pump feed at the very bottom with its fitting facing the on coming fuel swirl, fuel reg return also at the bottom going into the direction of swirl (and helping it swirl), tank feed nearer to the top in the direction of the swirl (again helping swirl) and only the top fitting in the center top as the tank return.

My thinking is it should reduce bubbles to a minimum in the surge tank.

Most surge tank designs ive seen have the fuel pressure reg return line and tank feed pretty high up on them, fittings are all bang smack in the middle not helping to get a swirl happening.

In tank return would need to be run and hose clamped to the floor to reduce bubbles into the in tank feed pump, which in turn would reduce surge tank bubbles.

What are your thoughts on this without getting into E85 compatible in tank foams?

Or an i just being a little (or very) anal about it? :)

Edited by GTRPSI
  • Like 1

I'm planning an intank system for an bnr34 with a walbro 460 and a Holley hydramat. Probably 11 inch square but I'm yet to get under the car to measure up what fits best in the bottom of the driver's side saddle. Also using a Sard jet pump sucking from the other side of the saddle as its venturi ratio is better than the stock one, especially coupled with the flow of a 460 pump. When I've got the stock one out of the car I'll test the flow multiplicatio performance of both at various rail return rates and decide which to use. Outlet of the jetpump+rail return flow will flow straight back onto the hydramat.

If this isn't enough to keep the surge away on hard right handers at high injector DC (minimal return to tank so venturi pump flow will be low) I'm thinking a low pressure lift pump passing fuel from the passenger saddle onto the hydramat on the driver's side. I am quite optimistic about the potential of the hydramat without this, a 11 square inch pickup patch is quite a lot of area.

I hate boot mounted fuel systems so I'm giving this a shot. I have 100hz logging of fuel pressure and fuel pressure and delta afr engine protection so I'm happy to give it a try. Goal is a 430+awkw circuit capable car. 9l Hi octane sump and accusump takes care of the business end.

Edited by burn4005
  • Like 2

Thats very interesting Scotty, never knew it existed, looks very promising.

Back to traditional fuel surge tanks and the fuelab clip, the air issue certainly opened my eyes and had me rethink surge tank designs. (and your mat discovery brings out feed design improvements)

Most surge tanks have the main pump feed outlet/s down the bottom, on the very top a return to the feed tank and a little down from the top the return line from the fuel pressure reg and tank feed input.

I was thinking to maybe get something else made up....

A tall cylinder, all inlets one one side entering at 45 degrees, pump outlet/s right opposite also at 45 degrees.

The idea being that anything entering all comes from one side of the cylinder to get the fuel rotating in the cylinder, in effect creating a vortex, much like those swirl pot air/oil separators.

Main fuel pump feed at the very bottom with its fitting facing the on coming fuel swirl, fuel reg return also at the bottom going into the direction of swirl (and helping it swirl), tank feed nearer to the top in the direction of the swirl (again helping swirl) and only the top fitting in the center top as the tank return.

My thinking is it should reduce bubbles to a minimum in the surge tank.

Most surge tank designs ive seen have the fuel pressure reg return line and tank feed pretty high up on them, fittings are all bang smack in the middle not helping to get a swirl happening.

In tank return would need to be run and hose clamped to the floor to reduce bubbles into the in tank feed pump, which in turn would reduce surge tank bubbles.

What are your thoughts on this without getting into E85 compatible in tank foams?

Or an i just being a little (or very) anal about it? :)

I think you're on the money with that design, not even sure the ethanol foams up like 98, but anything you can do to make sure no air bubbles find their way to the pump...

Logging fuel pressure is the key like Burn is doing. It's the only way to see whats happening at the track. Let us know how the Hydramat goes, I will likely be giving it a go very soon.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

Just to add to this thread for Scotty....

On Saturday i was with Danny (Barrys mate/half brother) from JAK mototrsworks and we got talking about the new fuelab pump and pressure reg with the 1 wire connection as they just fitted it to a Supra.

A Melb tuner mentioned they noted issues controlling fuel pressure bounce or stability with that pump/reg setup.

I wonder if its the pump control being too aggressive with the large pump or that it needs a (or a few) dampner/s in the line.

Just thought id bring it up to your attention as your always playing with fuel setups.....

Edited by GTRPSI

Just to add to this thread for Scotty....

On Saturday i was with Danny (Barrys mate/half brother) from JAK mototrsworks and we got talking about the new fuelab pump and pressure reg with the 1 wire connection as they just fitted it to a Supra.

A Melb tuner mentioned they noted issues controlling fuel pressure bounce or stability with that pump/reg setup.

I wonder if its the pump control being too aggressive with the large pump or that it needs a (or a few) dampner/s in the line.

Just thought id bring it up to your attention as your always playing with fuel setups.....

Not the first time I have heard of fuel line hammer, especially running large injectors. As there is no such dampener I have found for large diameter AN lines, I was either thinking to make or modify an existing plumbing anti hammer device for the job, or just run rubber lines which take the pulses out. Only seems to be an issue with teflon or hardlines.

I suggest people look inside their tanks, I know the baffles in a 32 tank around the pick up will stop you from running a hydramat

Yep, even the Stagea tank would need modification to fit the smaller mats in. I don't imagine any modern car would have room around the pickup.

Not the first time I have heard of fuel line hammer, especially running large injectors. As there is no such dampener I have found for large diameter AN lines, I was either thinking to make or modify an existing plumbing anti hammer device for the job, or just run rubber lines which take the pulses out. Only seems to be an issue with teflon or hardlines.

There are dampners that thread into fuel rails (just was looking at it on my sons S2000)

Would be pretty simple to drill and thread 2 into a fuel rail, one for the front bank and one for the rear bank between the reg return point on the rail.

There are dampners that thread into fuel rails (just was looking at it on my sons S2000)

Would be pretty simple to drill and thread 2 into a fuel rail, one for the front bank and one for the rear bank between the reg return point on the rail.

Are they massive, like the plumbing ones?

I have seen fuel hammer that bad it changes afr's dramatically, as have a few other tuners I have spoken to.

Do you have a link to the ones you found?

I just popped the bonnet to take a closer look on the sons S2000.

FPR on the right (vacuum hose connected to it) Yellowish/white thing on the left is the fuel inlet line with dampner.

zmrgdW.jpg

Another angle where you can see a banjo fuel in fitting under it.

xPulZa.jpg

Im thinking this is one version on one car, there could be others that dont use the banjo and can simply thread straight into the fuel rail as a stand alone unit, using the fuel rail as a fuel manifold.

Otherwise leave the banjo line in blocked or use a hollow spacer in its place, simply drill and tap a hole with thread into the fuel rail, mount one on the front half for the first 3 injectors and another one on the rear for the last 3 in twin entry fuel rail situations.

Or in other words, dont let fuel enter through them, leave them free on the rail to absorb pulses, let the fuel in as per normal so you can run whatever AN fittings you want without any restriction.

Edit, i wouldnt use them on the ends of the fuel rail with a banjo to let the fuel in as i think they would be too restrictive to fuel flow on high Hp situations, then again you could drill out the bango bolt holes for more flow.

Edited by GTRPSI

Just to inform people i purchased a Denso intank E85 compattable pump as per my tuner. Will be installing it sometime this month so all should be good now I will be getting rid of the 040!

What power level is said pump able to handle please?

  • 3 months later...

Has anyone use one of these to stop heating the fuel with big fuel pumps it's a fuel pump speed controller.

It's different to the ken bell voltage regulator as this 1 just pulses to feed 12 volt only

post-60000-14496402368938_thumb.jpg

Edited by mr skidz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What 1.5 way? There's no such thing really as a 1.5 way, just different ways of explaining 2 ways with different ramp rates. HOWEVER. In any driving in a straight line your 1.5 or 2 or 1.7 way should have no clunking at all. With the clutch fully depressed the diff should be silent (unless it's welded but I'm assuming it's not). Something aint right here.
    • Clutch is a spec brand, new clutch system,( PP, flywheel, friction disc, etc. pull type) installed 100 miles ago, with no problems.
    • looking for some help and maybe some insight on others experience with a new LSD. R34 GT ran and drove beautifully, but always alot of grip loss due to the open R200 rear end, so I just installed a new 1.5 LSD way into the stock open R200 for a ER34. Simple. Everything seemed right. I test drove for the first time this weekend. as I started to back out the garage the first time slowly with tires straight it sounded and felt like I had a loose or half disconnected drive shaft...that was clucking around loose and shaking entire vehicle, and making it feel like the trans clutch was spontaneously slipping then grabbing very roughly while just letting out pedal slowly. I backed it out went to pull forward with the same noise, shake and slip grab feeling with hesitation, I turned the tires to back out more and then pulled ahead some same thing but worst because of added wheel resistance (which that I expected) puzzled … pulling it back in checking everything over and finding nothing wrong, I tried it the next day. same thing, couldn’t believe how it shook everything again making a terrible noise and making it feel like the trans clutch was slipping and grabbing, but I got it out of garage into the driveway, got it straight, drove forward and then reveres a few times in a straight line everything shaking , causing what felt like clutch slip and grab every time, sounded like right behind front driver tire and I could feel it in the floor board with my feet,... worst right when beginning to let clutch pedal out to engage slightly, shuttering and sounding terrible along the way…I managed to slowly get down the road, babying it the whole way, once I was rolling (out of 1st) seemed to be better and between shifts, then clutch felt closer to normal…not slip/ grab etc., but back down to any stop, straight road or turning, same thing. Made no difference if all tires were straight or if I was turning. All other gauge read out correct. with in 2 miles as planned I reached the empty parking lot and performed the break in procedure that came with lsd, essentially to drive in a figure 8 a bunch.  Did this, binding chattering, and shaking the car the whole way. I drove it back home seemed somewhat normal once I was in straight line and past 10 mph or so, and I know it will “bind” on corners and cause some tires squeal when turning especially from a stop, but when I begin to move it still causes what feels like the trans clutch to slip and jerk badly as well as shaking the entire car, and sounds terrible, that I didn’t expect. I used the fluid they supplied with LSD kit and did the breaking, planning to change fluid as they suggest after breaking, but wondering will it get smoother or less aggressive with use? maybe a 1.5 is just too aggressive for normal road driving?   I have a LSD that I put in my 71 cuda when I restored it, with amazing smooth , quite yet effective results. Different style LSD but that ones a joy to drive. maybe expecting too much from this R200?
    • Join SAU NSW for a flame-grilled feed & flame-spitting cruise! Sunday 17th August 2025 3:30PM Meeting Archies Flame Grille Sylvania Waters 4:45PM Cruise Departure 5:15PM Arrival at Cape Solander Kurnell Meet Location: Archies Flame Grille Final Destination: Cape Solander Kurnell *Disclaimer* There will be a lead and follow car so no one should get lost. If you would like to attend or bring others along please put your name down and a +1 as numbers will be needed prior! This is NOT a race and we will all be adhering to all road rules. If this is what you want please come to one of our many track days. This is an official SAU:NSW event and will be run under a CAMS permit. One of the things that really sets our club apart is our commitment to being true enthusiasts. When on normal roads we strive to maintain good relations with the authorities as well as the public in general. When attending one of Skylines Australia NSW events please try to: • Be aware of surrounding environment and act accordingly. • Drive courteously on the state’s roads as a true enthusiast should. • Understand how important it is to maintain the good name of SAU NSW and thus, treat others accordingly. • Any misbehavior will not be tolerated and you will be asked to leave.
    • Yeah good luck out there! Will be good to see a mighty GTST going harder than the GTRs
×
×
  • Create New...