Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No Frigan way, lol on my single set up yea maybe.. Not with twins

Costs you more to do an engine by the time you refill coolant, power steering, front diff too

Actually I take that back... Not even with a single

Says the bloke building a 3.2 L. :D

Oh shit, beeeeen soooooo long I forgot about that and I was just getting used of the awesome power of the Tiida on 98 pump :)

Just been told the motor is complete and they are modifying the sump to suit the RB30 all wheel drive conversion, whatever that means :)

They bloody well should have from factory. Fairy ass 2.6 junk

Rb 30s don't have an awd sump

maybe thats why they are modifying it?

I do have a 9Lt sump on the car.

Ahh yes.. I forgot about that..

Please tell me your getting your old engine and head back?

getting everything back , I will need a truck to pick up all of the leftovers :(

Edited by Nismo 3.2ish

No Frigan way, lol on my single set up yea maybe.. Not with twins

Costs you more to do an engine by the time you refill coolant, power steering, front diff too

Actually I take that back... Not even with a single

took me less time doing the engine swap leaving the box in then taking it out

We don't build em to drive them around the car park :P

Pretty true mate, I was going to buy a new GTR but I did not have a feeling for them, saw the R34GTR and bought it , untuned and still had 1000 Klms to run it in. Unfortunately it was nothing like the Lees said it would be once it had the final tune, peaky 338awkw and crap as a DD.

Had to make my mind up what to do with it, modify it so it drives the way I want or piss it off. I tried a few mods that worked OK but still to weak until 3500rpm. the only way I could see how to get it firing up from the get-go was a stroker, maybe I went too far with the Nitto 3.2 but I figured more is better than less for what I want and the right foot or boost controller can take care of the extra power if I do not want to use it.

Might try some Hill Climbs and a few Mugs day at EC??

Have a look at it, how could I sell it, A GTR Skyline and like anything, if you like it, you like it!

post-52098-0-13537400-1421742877_thumb.jpg

post-52098-0-19951600-1421742923_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...