Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Everyone loves a picture.

Timing logs off my own car.

Without a crank trigger.

6C859AB6-5CA1-436B-AA65-873DBAD76007_zps

With crank trigger.

31EDDFD0-69B7-4BD8-8267-31B5B0438C21_zps

Probably worth mentioning that it's not essential on all RBs. For instance mine with the stock CAS is about as accurate as your trigger set up

Capture_zps65364c8d.jpg

Probably worth mentioning that it's not essential on all RBs. For instance mine with the stock CAS is about as accurate as your trigger set up

Capture_zps65364c8d.jpg

I don't understand how some can have issues while others won't, even with the same setups, .. I want to upgrade ECU but am fearful of timing issues, so don't know if I should go for a trigger kit from the get go even though as you say it's not essential in all cases

I hope something like that with all the mass at one side would not cause issues at high rpm? The design is a little different than the others I have seen. Would it still work with vct?

post-90047-14199930822356_thumb.jpg

Edited by BlackBox

Hi,

I thought the same but then I looked at some other kits that just use a longer bolt in the position of the adjustment bolts on the cam gear which weighs about the same as this 1.6mm rolled steel.

I welcome professional feedback :)

Cheers

The issue with using a disc is the centre if the cam gear is set back from the front.

Not a problem. Two piece centre, with a shim/washer behind. Spot weld together if paranoid, or make it out of 3mm sheet instead and machine some thickness off the bent up arms afterward.

The 2mm gap is the detection range and the finger needs to within the 2mm

This is what I was talking about, mine on my setup didn't read correctly till we got it out to exactly 2mm, any less and it would miss teeth, @ 1.1mm it would miss upto 9 in a roll at cranking speed, my ECU has a built in oscilloscope and that is how we found this issue

You only having one finger to look for probably won't be an issue though

It isn't volume it needs to be same moment of inertia. I=m x r x r where m is the mass in question and r the radius of the centre of the mass.

To work it out treat the bent up tab as one piece and the other section as a second piece. Add the results together.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • Those above shitboxes, mediocre and above usually have a turbo strapped to them, hence the slightly higher octane is required.  
    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
×
×
  • Create New...