Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone,
I'm soon to get a set of these made for myself locally and was wondering if anyone else is interested? Can do individual parts but would ideally have between 3-5 people interested. Cost wise its looking to be around $550 a set ( price will be confirmed though when there are definite numbers) I know the price is significantly more than the original run but it would still come in being sub $800 on the car and running while most other kits are $1000+. More than anything it highlights how much effort Cameron went into originally to get this organised for everyone at the best price he could! I have adjusted the original files slightly to suit easier to get fasteners which seemed to be a small issue originally but other than that really they are as Cameron designed. Please pm me or post here if you are interested and I can get the ball rolling.
Thanks,
Nic

  • 11 months later...

hi guys sorry to dig up and old post but i dont suppose anybody has the file for the crank trigger bracket, im currently converting over to a link ecu and would like to use a trigger system and i fancy building my own rather than paying the mental prices out there

 

thanks mike

  • 6 months later...

Anyone have one of these kits for sale or have the CAD files that were in a dropbox link posted a couple of times (the link no longer works unfortunately)

I didn't know anything about crank trigger setups at the time and now looking back this was an excellent product at a great price point and kicking myself for not jumping on it when murray was still selling the kits.


Thanks!

All good thanks for your help mate, legend!

Will keep everyone in here updated as to how i get on. If there is more interest i have access to a CNC so could get another group purchase going again.

  • Like 1
  • 6 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...