Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone,
I'm soon to get a set of these made for myself locally and was wondering if anyone else is interested? Can do individual parts but would ideally have between 3-5 people interested. Cost wise its looking to be around $550 a set ( price will be confirmed though when there are definite numbers) I know the price is significantly more than the original run but it would still come in being sub $800 on the car and running while most other kits are $1000+. More than anything it highlights how much effort Cameron went into originally to get this organised for everyone at the best price he could! I have adjusted the original files slightly to suit easier to get fasteners which seemed to be a small issue originally but other than that really they are as Cameron designed. Please pm me or post here if you are interested and I can get the ball rolling.
Thanks,
Nic

  • 11 months later...

hi guys sorry to dig up and old post but i dont suppose anybody has the file for the crank trigger bracket, im currently converting over to a link ecu and would like to use a trigger system and i fancy building my own rather than paying the mental prices out there

 

thanks mike

  • 6 months later...

Anyone have one of these kits for sale or have the CAD files that were in a dropbox link posted a couple of times (the link no longer works unfortunately)

I didn't know anything about crank trigger setups at the time and now looking back this was an excellent product at a great price point and kicking myself for not jumping on it when murray was still selling the kits.


Thanks!

All good thanks for your help mate, legend!

Will keep everyone in here updated as to how i get on. If there is more interest i have access to a CNC so could get another group purchase going again.

  • Like 1
  • 6 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...