Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just now, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Post cat should read leaner vs. pre cat O2.

so what do i trust. The dyno one of indeterminate age or my new one?

Sorry yeah - My post was a mess and I attempted to fix it.

In my example both sensors are post-cat. I realized later that I had literally pulled the motor apart and we saw no evidence of any knock and everything was sweet, so my WB was likely accurate (enough!, if anything the engine looked a little rich)

In your example I'd want to recalibrate both sensors. I realize this is not possible in the real world.

Best you can do is:

1) Calibrate current sensor
2) Calibrate a brand new sensor in same location (do you have an older one to compare to? Or is this a new purchase)

Observe any changes in readings.

I always thought it was 1M, I am clearly out of date. Mine is likely 2m+. I didn't want to have to choose one bank over another in my application.

1 hour ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Post cat should read leaner vs. pre cat O2.

I'd be thinking it's the other way around.

Less of an impact when rich compared to lean, but definitely in a lean condition the cat specifically uses up a lot more free oxygen.

When rich it's grabbing oxygen from other places to like NOx, but it still gets converted to CO2 and H2O.

  • 3 weeks later...

Current state of the 32

N6M8RXG.jpeg

On 18/06/2025 at 2:46 PM, CRSKmD said:

Unfortunately I only managed 45mins of track time over 3 sessions (20min, 20min, 5min) out of my allotted 90mins before my gearbox let go. Something related to shifter fork resulting in 3rd being neutral quickly followed by all gears neutral, then it being lock in two gears at once and unable to move. Optimistically there were no bad noises. But I am yet to pull box out and diagnose.

Had a mate help me pull the old box in the driveway to get to the root cause of the shifter issue and as expected it was shifter fork related. However, it was not the fork breaking like last time but instead the OEM keyway which had been cut off the stock fork and welded onto the billet fork I had made ~2 years ago. I was surprised to see the OEM keyway have such harsh corners which are a stress concentrator and just asking to be the weak point. 

howOv0N.jpeg

uq54UuK.jpeg

At the same time this box was rebuilt with the billet selector fork I had my spare box rebuilt to the same speak. Fingers crossed it won't have the same failure as it already in the car.


Couple other things left to button up while the car is on stands including a wideband/controller and addressing some power steering leaks that have popped up.

That's some really horrible design with the way it's cut/shaped!

Is there much damage to the box that failed in? IE, new fork and you can go again, or is it a total rebuild again?

Id be trying to build that piece from scratch, and getting some reliefs added in the corner to hopefully stop breakage, and then swapping boxes ASAP, and then doing the same to the currently good working box.

I'm assuming hard shifts have not been friendly to it!

yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy)

wHBw0nR.jpeg
57lB3zu.jpeg


unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty.

He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence.
I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too.

Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

I recall saying it felt like there was flex in gear just after the selector fork snapped so i assume it as related to the part fatiguing. however with the spare box into the car with the same shifter before I noticed the amount of flex there is in the shifter its self.

I think it always had some given the nature of how its constructed with the rubber isolator in between but this feels excessive?

 

 

 

I do not want to install a short shifter and the only other stock throw shifter I have seen is the Nismo "Rigid shifter" for $290

So plan A is to fill it with sikaflex to stiffen it up and hope for the best

4 minutes ago, CRSKmD said:

So plan A is to fill it with sikaflex to stiffen it up and hope for the best

Plan B? Get someone to machine up a metal bush/collar/whatever it needs to be to replace the rubber?

I haven't had a close look at that part recently to have a proper feel for whether that's possible. But it might be easy.

1 minute ago, GTSBoy said:

Plan B? Get someone to machine up a metal bush/collar/whatever it needs to be to replace the rubber?

I haven't had a close look at that part recently to have a proper feel for whether that's possible. But it might be easy.

image.thumb.png.7dddf1d931d7a7c80f0d7db587e558c1.png

the top black section is bonded to the silver section with some form of rubber. I assume to isolated NVH from the box

Something else I have been faffing with while the car was off the road is making the AC work. Assuming the car isn't at a thermal limit the idea of having AC while waiting in line to go on track sounds delightful.

I have actually been lugging around the weight of the entire system since 2018 when the RB25NEO went in without it working at all. 

The main reason was in the first few events before I got around to re-gassing it the rubber hose that runs under the manifold had the factory heat wrap/sleeve fail resulting in this:

tyY0ptr.jpeg

~2 years ago I purchased a complete used R32 AC line set but when I finally went to install it the line i needed was different where the expansion section is

Z9Lxjn2.jpeg

I found a local place that was able to replace the rubber section and re-crimp. They also added some modern heat sleeve to the hose
ofWElYn.jpeg

Tight fit but fingers crossed this is the last physical piece of the puzzle needed

Toy0sGI.jpeg

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...