Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'd be finding a new tuner if its costing you 1K for a E85 Tune, then 1K for a re-tune with a new turbo and nothing else changed on the engine...

Also it'd be a cheaper exercise to go buy a garrett GTX2863/2867 or something, and track down all the other required fittings/hoses separately, and you'd get a better turbo out of it.

Yes I was exaggerating a tad, but the point remains, do it right the first time, eventually that 20+ year old ceramic turbo is going to start shedding blades, whether it does it at 7psi or 14 who knows.

The OP seems to be happy to accept that risk, so I will butt out now.

The way the aussie dollar is going that HKS turbo might not be such a bad buy, it tempted me.

you can get yourself the same turbo locally for 1.7K, or the GTX2867 (same flow rate, smaller wheel.. what's not to love?) for about 2K, that leaves 1-1.3K to find lines, a wastegate, piping, studs and gaskets, spend the significant change you'd have on beers.

Or you could buy the HKS kit...

I was quite happy to accept my 800rpm lag penalty and only pay $900 for a Hiflow, though with some cam gears and a professional tuning it should reduce to about 500rpm. For me it made sense to go hiflow, when you start talking 2-3K for turbos your getting close to the threshold of ditching the 2L and going RB25

Edited by Missileman

RB20, but I believe they share the same housings, so after hiflowing they come out the same, but you would be best to talk to Stao from HyperGear to check that. The RB25 Neo is larger though.

Edited by Missileman

its about 1000rpm behind in making positive boost, and about 800rpm behing in reaching 10psi and thats running a safe home tune @ 1 bar (3800rpm), I have improvised knock ears and a wide band. I intend to get cam gears and a professional tune done as soon as I can afford, but fcuk-heads keep running into me and other things need attention to so tune is on hold for a while.

I've tuned it the best I can without a dyno but road tuning is harsh on the auto transmission

Sounds fairly responsive though, I'd imagine an r33 25 highflow with tuning and e85 should get around the same response you're getting with the 20 highflow so I might opt for that as the 20 highflows are quite rare second-hand

My $6...ie loads of 2c!.... Its a turbo car so turbo selection is kinda important.

Waaaay too many 20 owners choose the wrong turbo imo and the engine ends up getting blamed. Buy a blown HKS 2530 or 2540 to get the T3 GT28 housing in the right A/R for an RB20. You can get them for $100-250 used and then throw a GTX 2863 or 2860 at it.

The 67mm wheel without a proper exhaust manifold IMO won't work well with the 2867

With E85 the one thing RB20s take to VERY well is boost and revs so forget mismatched hi flows meant for an RB25 and spend <2K on the right turbo to give you bloody good punch and top end.

Given the final drive ratio of the R32 and weight you will be no slower than many RB25 powered cars... Even more powerful ones as they tend to just fry tyres with the extra power and torque unless they have sorted susp and tyres.

Please don't go RB25 high flow. You will make a punchy reliable 250-260rwkws with the GTX2863

  • Like 3

Sounds fairly responsive though, I'd imagine an r33 25 highflow with tuning and e85 should get around the same response you're getting with the 20 highflow so I might opt for that as the 20 highflows are quite rare second-hand

It's acceptable, you do notice the lack of torque from 2500 to 3500rpm compared to the stock turbo, but after that it leaves the stocker in its wake. The stock turbo tends to run out of breath near 6000, the hiflow hammers all the way to redline.

I don't know how the RB25 turbo behaves on a 20 but it must be somewhere between the two.

If you're trying to get every last bit of response then by all means follow what Roy has suggested, if you want something that bolts up to the stock pluming and is indistinguishable from stock, then look for a blown RB20 turbo on the forums they turn up every few months, that where I got mine, and then send it to Hypergear for hiflowing.

The 67mm wheel without a proper exhaust manifold IMO won't work well with the 2867

Fair enough, i'm well out of the rb20 game now.

Mike, I had a stock series 2 R33 turbo on my old R32, from memory it was almost as punchy in the low revs... and fell over almost as soon in the high revs, only made 174rwkw with a tune. May have been an issue with my decision to go for an ARC side-mount instead of a front mount though. Looking back i really wish i'd put in a kit to measure the air temps before/after the cooler, I bet that they were going crazy but I can't be sure.

So a hks 25xx turbine housing will bolt straight onto a Garrett gt28xx turbo? Is it just a case of taking off one housing to fit another or is anything else required?

You'd need to get some machining done to fit the correct profile, about $150 ish depending on who does it. Note i don't think you can do this for a gtx2860, only a gtx2863, i've run into issues trying to get gtx2860's sorted for gtr suitable comp covers. issue is that gtx2860's are smaller than 2530's (and all of the other gtr style ball bearing comp covers), so you can't exactly machine in extra material

Fair enough, i'm well out of the rb20 game now.

Mike, I had a stock series 2 R33 turbo on my old R32, from memory it was almost as punchy in the low revs... and fell over almost as soon in the high revs, only made 174rwkw with a tune. May have been an issue with my decision to go for an ARC side-mount instead of a front mount though. Looking back i really wish i'd put in a kit to measure the air temps before/after the cooler, I bet that they were going crazy but I can't be sure.

I doubt it - I made 225AWKW on my 25DET with a GCG highflow and a Trust SMIC (although it went to 245AWKW with an HDi front mount).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
×
×
  • Create New...