Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It really depends on your goal but I prefer smaller diameter runners, 6-2-1 with less merge area to keep the gas speed up. This may restrict your top end capabilities a little, but most don't need 800+kw of flow anyway.

Don't forget, the wastegate path is just as important as the turbo, the incorrect angle off the merge may see you struggling to control boost without a 60mm gate, and perhaps limit your top end flow unnecessarily.

Thanks for your input scotty.

Yes the wastegates will be angled correctly, even more so than most of the setups that tends to be at 90 degrees and are for sale these days.

Would love some manifold fabricators/vendors to chime in.

This the guy who made mine - have a look through his gallery:

http://www.sincocustoms.co.nz/gallery/Custom%20Fabrication/2

This the guy who made mine - have a look through his gallery:

http://www.sincocustoms.co.nz/gallery/Custom%20Fabrication/2

I had a look, none of those are 6-2 to the flange.

And sorry to trouble you scotty, do you have any photos of your 6-2-1 top mount setups?

Are you making you're own manifold, Mike?

Yes, definitely slow and steady though...

What I wanted to be able to do is have a compact billet collector, makes it as cheap as possible. But also so that you can build a 3-1 tube merge and weld it straight on.

This is my collector effort so far... the T4 flange part is billet machined to get the transition from circle to rectangle spot on.

Good stuff! That T4 flange part is exactly what I wanted as well as a T6 variant.

The 3-1 section off the back half of the cylinders for me would be further away so just a schedule 10 2.5 inch crossing over with the wastegate off that.

The front 3-1 section would be roughly the same or slightly lower with the wastegates being about 60 degrees from vertical, as the power steering/AC will be relocated elsewhere.

Edited by s2d4

why not merge them earlier to create more merge points for extra venturi effects and group each two that will fire close together? above collective looks alot like the usual twin scroll ..

Edited by AngryRB

why not merge them earlier to create more merge points for extra venturi effects and group each two that will fire close together? above collective looks alot like the usual twin scroll ..

The merge earlier part is exactly what I said 1 post above yours.

Not sure what you are on about for the "extra venturi effects and group each two that will fire close together" part though.

Good stuff! That T4 flange part is exactly what I wanted as well as a T6 variant.

The 3-1 section off the back half of the cylinders for me would be further away so just a schedule 10 2.5 inch crossing over with the wastegate off that.

The front 3-1 section would be roughly the same or slightly lower with the wastegates being about 60 degrees from vertical, as the power steering/AC will be relocated elsewhere.

I can get the flanges made with what ever primary size going into it and a T6 one too... send me a PM.

A more progressive merge and a waste gate port that is more in line with the merge instead of 90° is a lot better but I want to keep it compact and I am using twin 44mm gates so boost control should be ok.

The merge earlier part is exactly what I said 1 post above yours.

Not sure what you are on about for the "extra venturi effects and group each two that will fire close together" part though.

I was on about merging 1+5, 3+6 and 2+4 so you have 3 merge points then they merge into the final collector, when cyl1 fires then number 5 that fires next will have a vacuum in its runner ( venturi effect)

Each merge ( 3 pairs + 1 final merge) would step up in pipe size to encourage flow , maybe start off with a small diameter pipe and get larger at each collector like a set of TRI-Y extractors on a V8

http://www.ifs.tohoku.ac.jp/edge/library/020609ppsn(kanazaki).pdf

Edited by AngryRB

I was on about merging 1+5, 3+6 and 2+4 so you have 3 merge points then they merge into the final collector, when cyl1 fires then number 5 that fires next will have a vacuum in its runner ( venturi effect)

Each merge ( 3 pairs + 1 final merge) would step up in pipe size to encourage flow , maybe start off with a small diameter pipe and get larger at each collector like a set of TRI-Y extractors on a V8

http://www.ifs.tohoku.ac.jp/edge/library/020609ppsn(kanazaki).pdf

Not sure how that would work for a twin scroll setup?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...