Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all

currently in my track car have a rb25

360kws (graph below)

Mods

HTA3076R turbo with .82

Trail wastegate

dump and screamer

6 boost manifold

G4+ link computer

plazamaman Plenum

Yellow jackets

1000cc injectors on plazaman rail

Decent fuel set up

E85

Im thinking about bolting it all onto a rb30 i have thats in good nic.

will give the block a clean up, put new head studs etc with it.

is it worth going to the trouble? Whats gains would you think id see?

post-33454-0-05016500-1460001767_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464090-rb25-vs-2530/
Share on other sites

More torque, more power.

Frankly I wouldn't bother until your engine blows.

I was assuming that your track car was AWD which means an adapter plate but if its 2wd it not so hard.

You are making good power for a 3076 and to get the most out of a 3L block you might need a bigger turbo (maybe not).

But if you are keen by all means go ahead - you will go faster!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464090-rb25-vs-2530/#findComment-7708257
Share on other sites

Shaun is highly experienced with the entire RB engine range so it would come as a surprise if he hadn't identified VCT wasn't triggering. But stranger things have happened.

I drop by the workshop most Friday's, I'll ask him about your car tomorrow if you'd like?

As for your original question, it is a no brainer... yes to the RB30 option every time!

Here's my HTA3586 .85 RB30 25DET @ 22psi on the same dyno:

Same ECU and plenum too.

Your RB25DET is producing approx' 85kW at the wheels at 3700rpm vs. my RB2530DET 180+kW

At 4400rpm 135kW vs 330+.

Car goes back on the dyno Tues to complete the tune - yet to add timing and still rich up top - and wind boost up (~30psi)

post-81-1460017131271_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464090-rb25-vs-2530/#findComment-7708349
Share on other sites

Yep if you're going to pull the engine out definitely go the 30.

Here's my power curve with the 30 - less top end than yours but more power early and that's with a 3582 turbo (NB the torque curve - not so much the numbers - they mean nothing to me but more the shape of the curve and early peak torque):

post-49463-0-65183400-1460020953_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464090-rb25-vs-2530/#findComment-7708376
Share on other sites

No problem at all mate, happy to help out. He is no doubt flat-out preparing Terry's yellow RX2 (630kW rear wheel craziness!) for the ANDRA Finals this weekend but I'm sure I can squeeze in a brief chat.

That's the spirit! [emoji4][emoji106] It is well worth the effort and expense. You won't regret it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464090-rb25-vs-2530/#findComment-7708382
Share on other sites

Im doing exactly this but building a forged rb30 with a spare head whilst keeping the current 25 rolling. Ill swap my cams, turbo, exhaust manifold oil and water pumps across before dropping the 30 in.

Using four different RB's to create something unique:

Rb30 bottom end

Rb25 head

GTR intake

GTSR exhaust manifold

<3 the dirty 30

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464090-rb25-vs-2530/#findComment-7708468
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...