Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How the fuel gets into the cylinder, how the map sensor is seeing vacuum, how the engine managed to spin in the opposite direction to the starter motor,

From memory it cranked the right way then fired. God knows. Yavuz had no idea nor did Haltech. It did it more than once too. Thinking about it, I'd say it fired that early that the Piston wasn't far from BTDC, forcing the crank the other way. Trigger issue? Who knows. Pretty funny though!

I haven't had any issues with my PS2000, couldn't really recommend it more, though obviously there are others which have much the same features.

If you don't need it though, or aren't interested in it it isn't worth it. However I personally could never go back to an ECU without these features (power FC).

For example my car has been tuned many times. I recently dropped the boost to 18psi because reasons. Driving down a totally private road yesterday my car was at 18psi and as it turns out my AFR was 13.1:1.

If I had a power FC or even Nistune I would never have really known this.

My engine cut after 1s of this condition and because Haltech (and other better ECU's) automatically log this I was able to pull over and see why my engine just did that, and add fuel to the appropriate cells. Yes I have a wideband guage but I did not look at it. I also checked to see why the ECU was not automatically adding fuel to that area via the O2 controller. (can Nistune even do this?)

All of the above would just be ignored in a PowerFC world, and you'd be happily boosting away on 13-14AFR under 18psi and you would never, ever, ever notice until your engine decided to melt. Even after going to a tuner many times and being tuned many times on the dyno.

Am I paranoid a bit about this stuff? Yeah, maybe.

Maybe I've had more problems in the past than other people.

But getting a decent ECU, knowing how it (and your car) works to me is really a minimum requirement. I couldn't go back nor could I ever be happy not knowing, or recommending anything less. Anything less is "probably ok, maybe"

  • Like 1

I haven't had any issues with my PS2000, couldn't really recommend it more, though obviously there are others which have much the same features.If you don't need it though, or aren't interested in it it isn't worth it. However I personally could never go back to an ECU without these features (power FC).For example my car has been tuned many times. I recently dropped the boost to 18psi because reasons. Driving down a totally private road yesterday my car was at 18psi and as it turns out my AFR was 13.1:1.If I had a power FC or even Nistune I would never have really known this.My engine cut after 1s of this condition and because Haltech (and other better ECU's) automatically log this I was able to pull over and see why my engine just did that, and add fuel to the appropriate cells. Yes I have a wideband guage but I did not look at it. I also checked to see why the ECU was not automatically adding fuel to that area via the O2 controller. (can Nistune even do this?)All of the above would just be ignored in a PowerFC world, and you'd be happily boosting away on 13-14AFR under 18psi and you would never, ever, ever notice until your engine decided to melt. Even after going to a tuner many times and being tuned many times on the dyno.Am I paranoid a bit about this stuff? Yeah, maybe.Maybe I've had more problems in the past than other people.But getting a decent ECU, knowing how it (and your car) works to me is really a minimum requirement. I couldn't go back nor could I ever be happy not knowing, or recommending anything less. Anything less is "probably ok, maybe"

So what your saying is the Haltech leaned your engine out for no apparent reason then cut your engine, ok got it :thumbsup:

  • Like 1

Har har. :P

Cars are variable things and things change under the hood.

It's better to be able to see them before you feel the effects of something going wrong.

People only say "I don't need it, my Power FC is fine" until you do want a feature or your logs or safeguards catch something that is unmonitorable or unknowable with a more basic management system.

PowerFC can't do wideband 02 feedback

/thread

even the likes of a No Frills Adaptronic can do it, cut power on lean out once it can't correct enough...

Leaning out probably wasn't the ECU's fault, probably lazy fuel pump, faulty FPR, fuel slosh, clogged filter, etc.

Nah it obviously wasn't the ECU's fault. The car was tuned on 24psi.

But it's saved me in multiple cases, like say 18psi when the cells weren't so well mapped. I've since fixed boost leaks etc. This changes tune. I've changed exhausts. This may change the tune.

I've also had a clogged fuel filter setting off engine protection due to lean.

Point being was, car felt fine in all of these cases but wasn't. Infact, it was dangerously lean.

I'd never choose an ECU without that function for saving a couple hundred bucks.

Auto logging when the car does something weird is a god send.

The features only seem un-necessary until you benefit from them once, and then they become must-haves.

Consistency is the key!

Yeah it's nice when you see your AFRs spiking to 15-16 when it decides to advance the timing 4 degrees more than it should. I suppose that's why its so important to have AFR feedback on a Haltec, to hide all its stuff ups.

My haltech does all sorts of terrible things, like start first time everytime, drives better then it ever has, gets great fuel economy even on e85, makes good power reliably and has rock solid ignition timing due to the ability to run a crank trigger

Yep what a shit ecu

  • Like 2

My haltech does all sorts of terrible things, like start first time everytime, drives better then it ever has, gets great fuel economy even on e85, makes good power reliably and has rock solid ignition timing due to the ability to run a crank trigger

Yep what a shit ecu

My FC does all that except the trigger wheel, it doesn't have to use one, and 650km+ out of 60l and 11.1@123mph from stock turbos, what an absolute POS it is lol :P
  • Like 1

Yeah it's nice when you see your AFRs spiking to 15-16 when it decides to advance the timing 4 degrees more than it should. I suppose that's why its so important to have AFR feedback on a Haltec, to hide all its stuff ups.

Ignition timing should have no bearing on AFR from my (limited) understanding. Once the injector is closed AFR can't be altered yeah?

  • Like 1

Yeah it's nice when you see your AFRs spiking to 15-16 when it decides to advance the timing 4 degrees more than it should. I suppose that's why its so important to have AFR feedback on a Haltec, to hide all its stuff ups.

Lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...