Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How the fuel gets into the cylinder, how the map sensor is seeing vacuum, how the engine managed to spin in the opposite direction to the starter motor,

From memory it cranked the right way then fired. God knows. Yavuz had no idea nor did Haltech. It did it more than once too. Thinking about it, I'd say it fired that early that the Piston wasn't far from BTDC, forcing the crank the other way. Trigger issue? Who knows. Pretty funny though!

I haven't had any issues with my PS2000, couldn't really recommend it more, though obviously there are others which have much the same features.

If you don't need it though, or aren't interested in it it isn't worth it. However I personally could never go back to an ECU without these features (power FC).

For example my car has been tuned many times. I recently dropped the boost to 18psi because reasons. Driving down a totally private road yesterday my car was at 18psi and as it turns out my AFR was 13.1:1.

If I had a power FC or even Nistune I would never have really known this.

My engine cut after 1s of this condition and because Haltech (and other better ECU's) automatically log this I was able to pull over and see why my engine just did that, and add fuel to the appropriate cells. Yes I have a wideband guage but I did not look at it. I also checked to see why the ECU was not automatically adding fuel to that area via the O2 controller. (can Nistune even do this?)

All of the above would just be ignored in a PowerFC world, and you'd be happily boosting away on 13-14AFR under 18psi and you would never, ever, ever notice until your engine decided to melt. Even after going to a tuner many times and being tuned many times on the dyno.

Am I paranoid a bit about this stuff? Yeah, maybe.

Maybe I've had more problems in the past than other people.

But getting a decent ECU, knowing how it (and your car) works to me is really a minimum requirement. I couldn't go back nor could I ever be happy not knowing, or recommending anything less. Anything less is "probably ok, maybe"

  • Like 1

I haven't had any issues with my PS2000, couldn't really recommend it more, though obviously there are others which have much the same features.If you don't need it though, or aren't interested in it it isn't worth it. However I personally could never go back to an ECU without these features (power FC).For example my car has been tuned many times. I recently dropped the boost to 18psi because reasons. Driving down a totally private road yesterday my car was at 18psi and as it turns out my AFR was 13.1:1.If I had a power FC or even Nistune I would never have really known this.My engine cut after 1s of this condition and because Haltech (and other better ECU's) automatically log this I was able to pull over and see why my engine just did that, and add fuel to the appropriate cells. Yes I have a wideband guage but I did not look at it. I also checked to see why the ECU was not automatically adding fuel to that area via the O2 controller. (can Nistune even do this?)All of the above would just be ignored in a PowerFC world, and you'd be happily boosting away on 13-14AFR under 18psi and you would never, ever, ever notice until your engine decided to melt. Even after going to a tuner many times and being tuned many times on the dyno.Am I paranoid a bit about this stuff? Yeah, maybe.Maybe I've had more problems in the past than other people.But getting a decent ECU, knowing how it (and your car) works to me is really a minimum requirement. I couldn't go back nor could I ever be happy not knowing, or recommending anything less. Anything less is "probably ok, maybe"

So what your saying is the Haltech leaned your engine out for no apparent reason then cut your engine, ok got it :thumbsup:

  • Like 1

Har har. :P

Cars are variable things and things change under the hood.

It's better to be able to see them before you feel the effects of something going wrong.

People only say "I don't need it, my Power FC is fine" until you do want a feature or your logs or safeguards catch something that is unmonitorable or unknowable with a more basic management system.

PowerFC can't do wideband 02 feedback

/thread

even the likes of a No Frills Adaptronic can do it, cut power on lean out once it can't correct enough...

Leaning out probably wasn't the ECU's fault, probably lazy fuel pump, faulty FPR, fuel slosh, clogged filter, etc.

Nah it obviously wasn't the ECU's fault. The car was tuned on 24psi.

But it's saved me in multiple cases, like say 18psi when the cells weren't so well mapped. I've since fixed boost leaks etc. This changes tune. I've changed exhausts. This may change the tune.

I've also had a clogged fuel filter setting off engine protection due to lean.

Point being was, car felt fine in all of these cases but wasn't. Infact, it was dangerously lean.

I'd never choose an ECU without that function for saving a couple hundred bucks.

Auto logging when the car does something weird is a god send.

The features only seem un-necessary until you benefit from them once, and then they become must-haves.

Consistency is the key!

Yeah it's nice when you see your AFRs spiking to 15-16 when it decides to advance the timing 4 degrees more than it should. I suppose that's why its so important to have AFR feedback on a Haltec, to hide all its stuff ups.

My haltech does all sorts of terrible things, like start first time everytime, drives better then it ever has, gets great fuel economy even on e85, makes good power reliably and has rock solid ignition timing due to the ability to run a crank trigger

Yep what a shit ecu

  • Like 2

My haltech does all sorts of terrible things, like start first time everytime, drives better then it ever has, gets great fuel economy even on e85, makes good power reliably and has rock solid ignition timing due to the ability to run a crank trigger

Yep what a shit ecu

My FC does all that except the trigger wheel, it doesn't have to use one, and 650km+ out of 60l and 11.1@123mph from stock turbos, what an absolute POS it is lol :P
  • Like 1

Yeah it's nice when you see your AFRs spiking to 15-16 when it decides to advance the timing 4 degrees more than it should. I suppose that's why its so important to have AFR feedback on a Haltec, to hide all its stuff ups.

Ignition timing should have no bearing on AFR from my (limited) understanding. Once the injector is closed AFR can't be altered yeah?

  • Like 1

Yeah it's nice when you see your AFRs spiking to 15-16 when it decides to advance the timing 4 degrees more than it should. I suppose that's why its so important to have AFR feedback on a Haltec, to hide all its stuff ups.

Lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes, it will take a fair amount of solution but the sodium citrate + citric acid + detergent is cheap stuff. Use laundry detergent instead of dish soap if you want to reduce the bubbles, also you could just buy sodium citrate and add some citric acid to the mix until you get to a weakly acidic solution if you don't feel like dealing with all the bubbling generated by adding everything together. For a fuel tank you need quite a lot of distilled water but it's probably worth the effort.
    • Actually looks like a Nitrous setup now 😆
    • @robbo_rb180 I already have a NEO head on the shitbox 😎 Just needs beehive springs so I can rev it past the 8600 rpm limiter, then again pointless too, turbo is out of puff lol. Wen da gods let me win lotto eh?
    • Everyone I know with a90 supra at time attack aren't having issues with 3-5 fast laps so far and one is decent powered one too. Saw a k24 swapped 86 with a 8hp70 and big slicks and aero which had no drama's at QR and Manton Park. I've stuck a 25 row cooler in my setup with 8hp45/50 in the hopes of keeping the oil cool as I plan on some racing next year that 20-30min sessions. I've also geared my car so won't be using 7th and 8th gear too. @Dose Pipe Sutututu just needs to get that samsonas in already and have that tassie guy fit a head and rev it too 11ty thousand rpm. 
    • My embedded systems thoughts have me sitting with GTS on this. Variation between same phone hardware, should be small. However, the internal "intensity" or "volume" amount that say Google passes to the app, will be quite different, as the underlying hardware will be passing different levels for the same volume to the Google OS. Until the app creator has had each individual phone, and set benchmarks and calibrations for each, the amount of error can be quite huge.   It can even be observed by using different phones, recording the same noise, and then playing it back, they end up soon ding different. A big reason for it, is even the different types of mics used in phones have different responses, and different frequency ranges. Then you need to get into the DSP, and the variations in those, their sample rates which then effect their frequency range, and then the quality of the DSP, and what type of hardware conversion they do to for the ADC within the DSP. Oh, and let's not forget at the low level phones are designed to cutout loud sounds. It's one of the reasons they suck in really loud environments (eg concerts). The louder you yell, the more you'll get cutout too Note DSP is Digital Signal Processor ADC is the analogue to data converter. I don't have any real data on what the variation would truly be, however, chat GPT says in general, their output is typically between +/-2dB to +/-5dB of what you're really measuring. So realistically, anything from 4 to 10dB variation is possible even with the same devices.
×
×
  • Create New...