Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys, planning on jumping on the efr 8374 T4 1.05 bandwagon shortly, just wanted to clarify few things:

going for EWG, any benefits to choosing IWG?

looking at 6boost manifold, should i be going 1 or 2 gate option?

TIA

 

Just now, R.3.2.G.T.R said:

hi guys, planning on jumping on the efr 8374 T4 1.05 bandwagon shortly, just wanted to clarify few things:

going for EWG, any benefits to choosing IWG?

looking at 6boost manifold, should i be going 1 or 2 gate option?

TIA

 

EWG is much better than IWG (and only available in .92 I think)

You will need twin gate if it's a twin scroll manifold or they might do a split single pipe.

17 minutes ago, acsplit said:

EWG is much better than IWG (and only available in .92 I think)

You will need twin gate if it's a twin scroll manifold or they might do a split single pipe.

external gate it is
whats the recommended wastegate port size for both single and twin gate options?

On 4/12/2018 at 9:17 AM, HarrisRacing said:

These are my old pumpgas results on 8374 IWG with nothing more than changing cam settings (increased overlap).

 

 

 

Sorry guys here are the results. Tapatalk didn't let me upload.

 

Screenshot_20180412-091600_Photos.jpg

Oh and I want to qualify something in case someone dug any of this up from the past in this thread.

 GTR's are pretty hard to come by in the states and I went off the deep end with my build. My car showed up with a rod knock and I didn't really get to experience the factory twins in their stock form. I went straight to 2.75L stroker and BW 8374 EFR IWG .92 turbo on a 6 boost manifold. Well during my build I had the typical accusations of "American Horsepower" which bothered me and my car ended up running about 128 mph in the 1/4 on pumpgas and 93 octane. On our dyno the car would typically put around 575 whp down at around 19-20 psig boost. Then I tuned it on E85 with the new ECUmasters EMUBLACK and the car made 740 whp and 615 wtq at 30 psi tapering to 25 or so on topend...again I think there were neigh sayers about it. I shortly thereafter crashed the car before I could get to the track and prove the new MPH (and run my 9 second pass). Rest assured, I still have the car and the drivetrain is still good (foreshadowing here).

Anyway, fast forward I just picked up another R32 GTR. I spent the day checking it out and going through it. It has an exedy hyper single clutch, stock RB26 with N1 oil and water pumps (don't worry, I know), some filter pods, brand new Garrett -7 turbos, R34 intercooler, Greddy downpipe, HKS super Dragger exhaust. It was running STOCK boost at 10 psi and I'll be honest felt pretty dang laggy to me coming from my other car. Well I put the car on the SAME DYNO here (mine) and started turning up the boost and checking AFR's today. Here are the results and the car got MUCH more fun to drive with the increased boost from 10 psi up to ~17 or so today. Looks like I need to pull the plugs and gap them because it broke up right at the top on the higher boost runs (or there is an AFM limit on this ecu?). I don't have much experience with stock RB26 or stock format twins, but the car pulled very nicely on the street (once it get spooled up). It goes to show that a stroker and 8374 EFR completely crush the pumpgas results from my other car.

 

 

RB26 -7 dyno pumpgas 17 psi max.jpg

RB26 -7 dyno pumpgas starting at 10psi.jpg

 

8374 EFR 2_75L stroker pumpgas 93 dyno.jpg

  • Like 2
9 hours ago, acsplit said:

Here is a dyno sheet of Jake Jones RB28 now with 9174.  The precision was junk for drifting too laggy. Most overseas drifters run an EFR so will be interesting to see what he thinks. Screenshot_20180423-232603.thumb.png.8a20d6960cdb71a9c3df7e4da5f32e43.pnga

Nice- fair to assume the blue line is the EFR9174?  Any idea of which housing on the EFR?  

Interesting seeing the progression - Garrett > Precision > Borg Warner EFR.  Be interesting to see if he stays with this now.

Edited by Lithium
10 minutes ago, acsplit said:

9174 iron supercore 1.05 ewg. 

https://youtu.be/GE_X_OJays8

Awesome, I'd have thought the 1.45 would be more appropriate but that still seems to be pumping out quite a bit of power even with the "smaller" housing.

  • Like 1
11 hours ago, acsplit said:

Here is a dyno sheet of Jake Jones RB28 now with 9174.  The precision was junk for drifting too laggy. Most overseas drifters run an EFR so will be interesting to see what he thinks. Screenshot_20180423-232603.thumb.png.8a20d6960cdb71a9c3df7e4da5f32e43.pnga

That's a huge hole that's been filled! Mind you, that 6870 probably has 200-300hp left in it

1 hour ago, SimonR32 said:

That's a huge hole that's been filled! Mind you, that 6870 probably has 200-300hp left in it

Yeah it's a bit tricky when two turbos being compared have fairly different flow potentials, it's pretty misleading if it's not made really clear that the "laggier" turbo actually is operating below it's potential to make that power while the "awesome powerband" turbo is probably sitting near it's limit to achieve the same thing.

On the flipside, 200-300 sounds pretty generous - >840 @ hubs is not messing about, the Mainline hub dynos don't seem as "happy" as the Dynapacks.

  • Like 1
On 4/24/2018 at 10:32 AM, Lithium said:

Yeah it's a bit tricky when two turbos being compared have fairly different flow potentials, it's pretty misleading if it's not made really clear that the "laggier" turbo actually is operating below it's potential to make that power while the "awesome powerband" turbo is probably sitting near it's limit to achieve the same thing.

On the flipside, 200-300 sounds pretty generous - >840 @ hubs is not messing about, the Mainline hub dynos don't seem as "happy" as the Dynapacks.

Mine went 770 on dynapack and 780 on mainline with less boost and richer so go figure haha. Mind you it did have some very nice R35 coils throwing spark on mainline

18 hours ago, SimonR32 said:

Mine went 770 on dynapack and 780 on mainline with less boost and richer so go figure haha. Mind you it did have some very nice R35 coils throwing spark on mainline

Oh interesting - I guess I shouldn't be surprised, but a few Mainline lads have implied that the Dynapacks read a lot higher and I just went with that.  I wouldn't have expected the R35 coils to make much difference unless your spark was only just (or not) holding up before.

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Lithium said:

Oh interesting - I guess I shouldn't be surprised, but a few Mainline lads have implied that the Dynapacks read a lot higher and I just went with that.  I wouldn't have expected the R35 coils to make much difference unless your spark was only just (or not) holding up before.

Was borderline previous, think gaps were just under 0.5 while easily threw spark at 0.8 with R35 coils

12 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

Was borderline previous, think gaps were just under 0.5 while easily threw spark at 0.8 with R35 coils

Ahh ok, yeah could have been a thing to muddy things a bit.  Still, it's a lot of power in any money - and I'm not sure a 6870 would make 1100hp @ hubs haha

3 hours ago, Lithium said:

Ahh ok, yeah could have been a thing to muddy things a bit.  Still, it's a lot of power in any money - and I'm not sure a 6870 would make 1100hp @ hubs haha

No but I don't think 1000hp is out of the question with the right gear and tune

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I am getting the same issue. Did you resolve it? I just got it after installing my new super coppermix and literally the same issue, new fork, new 18mm carrier, release bearing that came with the kit and replicated the exact same sound. 
    • If you like - I have the STL files so I can email em. There's a couple of gotchas (i.e the holes are not threaded so you might need/will need) to utilize some M3 melt-in threads for some of the points. However if you want to be super accurate, and are willing to remove your calipers and your SHOCKS it's a really good tool. You also might need to scale the part that measures the tyre width a bit wider. It defaults to a 7.5in tyre and I mean who is running that. Luckily with the magic of CAD this is very easy to rescale.
    • jeebus. glad you weren't under it while performing the stunt. Also thanks for the link to the wheel measurer, exactly what I needed
    • In the older stuff there were very significant differences 2wd to 4wd, for example Stagea had strut front end for 2wd and double wishbone for 4wd so it was not minor to swap. From poking around the 2wd v37, it *looks* like it might be more possible; some of the parts specifically have "2wd" stamped on them which suggests the platforms are more similar. You'd still want to start with a 4wd half cut to swap stuff from though. I'd suggest if you don't have a tune on the ECU you don't really need one on the trans either. Throttle mapping is in the ECU side (and you can always use a Roar Pedal if you want the throttle to actually respond to your foot), and really if you are happy with the stock power you probably accept the stock trans behaviour too....its all made to be "sporty" not racey.
    • So, updates. I have not washed the car since it came back from Tassie. I've driven it around a bit but not got around to actually sorting it out. I DID raise it because I cracked the rear bar leaving a hotel which was very distressing. Interestingly, the car drives more compliant now that it's raised a fair bit (5mm front, 15mm rear). Also noticed that my FR height was 10mm lower than FL. So that's now sorted out, too. I also bought this and had it printed: https://www.etsy.com/au/listing/1576422240/wheel-and-tire-fitment-tool-universal?ref=shop_home_feat_1&dd=1&logging_key=08f604d9fa4cc383550ba985e6ac85cd5cac7fbb%3A1576422240 Now, if I was smart I would have taken my brake calipers off to actually use this correctly but it was evident enough to me that in the region where the caliper was... there was nothing to hit suspension/guard/arm wise. So I'm going with "it'll be fine" after using the tool to hopefully very precisely measure the wheel clearance. Also while doing this, I had the very VERY bad idea of jacking one of the wheels/suspension arms up while the rest of the car was on jack stands. I did this to see how the arm would travel. This all was well and good until the car slid off the stands and went through a fence. So don't do that. Incredibly nobody was hurt and there was only minor damage to the rear bumper as the car didn't have far to slide, and had 3-4 wheels on it. The only damage turned out to be the fence itself which was easy to fix, and a little bit of damage to the fibreglass rear bumper trim. I had already planned to try a touch up paint kit to fix the time I drove into my garage door to see if it'd help in the interim before I get it fixed properly. I used the Dr Colorchip kit after looking online and seeing everyone talking about it. Yes it's made for chips and not huge broken missing pieces and I'll be 500% recommending it for stone chips after using it for stupid things like me. This took about ... 10 minutes and looking at the half assed photo the 30 second job I did on the bumper corner was almost perfect just by using the tiny little brush and painting it in. The sealact stuff to remove over-painting is really useful, so if/when I do it again I'll likely slather the touch up paint well over it and then clean it up with the cleaning solution. The wheels should arrive in a couple of weeks. I am still kinda confident after doing a stupid amount of measuring (and borrowing a set of 18x10.5+15) that they will not fit because I overlooked something, somehow and flew too close to the sun. ALSO R34 GTR guard liners do not fit on a GTT. I bought the undertray brake duct guides and had the wonderful problem of them not fitting my intake, my oil cooler and the liners themselves were even worse. Attempting to fit them won't work in general - You would have to cut them up as another poster mentioned as the bodywork is different on the GTT. At least I can try to resell them. So instead of cutting those up, I cut up my old already-cut-up GTT liners and extended them by using some PP plastic and drilling some 8mm holes for some nissan clips for the 'extra' bit. Because I was happy to cut them I was able to mount them pretty damn forward so I now have some semblance of guard liners, and the brake vents seal the bumper from the bottom. It sort-of-looks like this, to give some idea - If you look at the GTR and then the GTT this is when I realised that I needed to seriously measure as the inside of the rim area is entirely, entirely, entirely different and could not take any internet measurements for granted.   
×
×
  • Create New...