Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 7/15/2022 at 5:03 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Once you go DBW, you don't look back. Great idle quality, AC doesn't cause idle quality to degrade.

The factory air leak valves are so slow to react, with bigger cams your motor is very inefficient at lower RPMs the compressor engaging is enough to stall the motor.

Nissan should have used stepper motors like JZs or 4Gs, instead they installed a two slow reacting air leak valves lol.

Have you seen the rats nest of hoses under the intake manifold of an RB26? Stepper motors for idle control is far too elegant. On the bright side at least the power steering idle up on these motors isn't a physical valve that can start leaking power steering fluid into the intake with age.

  • Haha 1
On 15/7/2022 at 11:12 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Used up everyone single DPI, AVI. Even sacrificed the power steering input lol.

DBW uses up 4x inputs.

How many extra i/o’s does if use. 

On 16/7/2022 at 10:03 AM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Once you go DBW, you don't look back. Great idle quality, AC doesn't cause idle quality to degrade.

The factory air leak valves are so slow to react, with bigger cams your motor is very inefficient at lower RPMs the compressor engaging is enough to stall the motor.

Nissan should have used stepper motors like JZs or 4Gs, instead they installed a two slow reacting air leak valves lol.

The fact they fitted 2 of them always confused me 

On 16/7/2022 at 12:03 PM, RBW49N said:

How many extra i/o’s does if use. 

Drive by wire uses 4 AVIs and the 2 dbw driver wires 

brake and clutch pedal use one each 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
On 16/7/2022 at 12:55 PM, r32-25t said:

Drive by wire uses 4 AVIs and the 2 dbw driver wires 

brake and clutch pedal use one each 

Thanks Looks like I’ll need an i/o expander. May as well get a can button panel as well. No clutch pedal on mine. So I saved one there

To free up some AVIs you can cheat with the temperature sensors and use them on SPIs and change the scaling of the sensor to suit 

the drive by wire AVIs must be on the ecu and can’t be in the i/o box 

  • Like 1
On 7/16/2022 at 12:27 PM, r32-25t said:

Did you not already fit a brake pedal input when going to dbw as fail safe if something goes to shit? 

Is that even a thing?

On 16/7/2022 at 1:01 PM, r32-25t said:

To free up some AVIs you can cheat with the temperature sensors and use them on SPIs and change the scaling of the sensor to suit 

the drive by wire AVIs must be on the ecu and can’t be in the i/o box 

I’ll have to move some other stuff to the I/o box then. Probably auto controls

On 7/16/2022 at 1:05 PM, RBW49N said:

Try doing a brake job in a modern car with a factory ecu 

That's a different story.

In relation to aftermarket ecus with dbw I have never seen them need a brake pedal input as part of the safety system.

  • Like 1
On 16/7/2022 at 2:16 PM, Ben C34 said:

That's a different story.

In relation to aftermarket ecus with dbw I have never seen them need a brake pedal input as part of the safety system.

When you select drive by wire in the haltech ecu it pushes you to set up a brake pedal input so that if the pedal says be closed and the brake pedal is saying you want to stop but the throttle isn’t closed it will put it straight into limp mode 

On 7/16/2022 at 3:42 PM, r32-25t said:

When you select drive by wire in the haltech ecu it pushes you to set up a brake pedal input so that if the pedal says be closed and the brake pedal is saying you want to stop but the throttle isn’t closed it will put it straight into limp mode 

Interesting. Link ecus definitely dont do that, nor do motec from my experience.

 

 

it deosnt make sense, because all that matters is the pedal and the throttle relationship. If the pedal is lifted and the throttle is still open it should go to safety conditions straight away, regardless if you push the brake or not. Can't see how it helps at all. 

 

Also I am assuming you mean  a mismatch between the pedal and throttle and foot on the brake makes it go into safety mode, otherwise you wouldn't be able to do burnouts and that would be dumb!

 

 

Anyway I looked it up and it is optional to have the brake pedal as part of dbw safety with Haltech, and it doesnt relate to a failsafe function really anyway compared to having to have a primary and secondary position sensor on both Pedal and throttle.

 

Brake Pedal Check  Enable if a Brake Pedal Switch has been wired and configured. Enabling this function will enable the Max Brake TPS Setting. This setting will override all other commanded throttle values.

 

 

 

 

From

https://support.haltech.com/portal/en/kb/articles/drive-by-wire-elite

can't see why anyone would actually do it.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

The brake input is optional on the Haltech, I personally don't use the brake input.

I'll post up my IO assignment tonight, unfortunately using SPI for temperature sensors are not recommended as you lose resolution. 

  • Like 1
On 7/16/2022 at 4:36 PM, r32-25t said:

I hooked up both my brake and clutch pedals into the ecu all my temp sensors are on AVI except fuel 

So are you using a lower throttle plate max opening with brake pressed?

On 16/7/2022 at 5:25 PM, Duncan said:

using a brake pedal override seems like a nightmare for left foot braking/trail braking, and burnouts for that matter

Sounds like a great excuse to have a “hoon” “race” button on the CAN keypad

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...