Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is 320kw for a unopened Rb25 Neo to much ?

Hey All,

 

So looking at possibly buying a R34 with some work done to it, there is one i have found that has had a fair bit of work done to it. it is pushing 320kw at the wheels.

is 320kw for a unopened neo to much ? it would be my daily drive, it wouldn't see any track days or anything as i don't live close enough to any.

It's probably about as far as you'd want to push one.  But as always, the length of the piece of string is in question.  Other factors to consider are.....1) how often has it actually MADE 320 rwkW in its life....ie, how hard has the previous owner driven/treated it?  320rwkW as a street car giving little hits 3 times a day only when warmed up is very different to the life of a drifter.  2) How hard are you going to treat it?  If just a streeter, then you might be just as happy turning the wick down a little bit and driving it around at 280-300 rwkW.

  • Like 1

320 is the number where everything on a skyline starts to die (if you go over it)

 

I.e

a) Too much lag
b) Gearboxes die
c) Clutches start becoming expensive/hard to drive
d) Grip is a problem, no tyres exist to keep your foot on the ground in RWD

As mentioned it's not "too much" as long as you confirm the rest of the setup being healthy, or whether it all looks sketchy as f**k. If it's a known car, decent human, people can confirm its status, seems to behave, pass tests, yeah it's not too much. Keep in mind though, and perhaps even keep some money aside for 'another' engine, because 'safe' does not mean 'safe indefinitely'. There have been reported failures on good setups well under 300KW as well.

Its one of those things, 300/320 whatever it is on a street car sounds bad.  But its not just the 300 you have to consider either, the boost to achieve it becomes an important factor.  The turbo being used also plays a big part.

In a street car where you are just driving and take off from the lights or overtake a B double etc you may not even see the full 20psi or reach the 300.  You might do it all inside 250 and say 14 psi and the turbo is a good one and easily handles it.

Then you have to look at how often you are going to do that.  In a year  - with normal sensible driving - you might do it 3 or 4 times and only for 5 minutes before you're backing off.  So you might use up to 300kw for 30 minutes in a year.

I always tell everyone that at 100km/h my car is a 2.5 litre twin cam straight 6......end of story - my turbo doesn't really boost before this in 5th.  If I exceed 100km/h or am going up a steep hill, then it becomes a turbo car with a potential 300kw that I may or may not need for a few minutes.

So yes, a Neo can handle +300kw, but its all about your environment, how you use it and your driving style.  I have 50,000 on my Gtst and have had no problems, but I did set up for it with a good turbo and supporting mods, so if mine can then the Neo certainly can.

Note that I am ignoring any form of showing off or street racing, you do that then whatever happens is ALL your fault. 

39 minutes ago, tridentt150v said:

Its one of those things, 300/320 whatever it is on a street car sounds bad.  But its not just the 300 you have to consider either, the boost to achieve it becomes an important factor.  The turbo being used also plays a big part.

In a street car where you are just driving and take off from the lights or overtake a B double etc you may not even see the full 20psi or reach the 300.  You might do it all inside 250 and say 14 psi and the turbo is a good one and easily handles it.

Then you have to look at how often you are going to do that.  In a year  - with normal sensible driving - you might do it 3 or 4 times and only for 5 minutes before you're backing off.  So you might use up to 300kw for 30 minutes in a year.

I always tell everyone that at 100km/h my car is a 2.5 litre twin cam straight 6......end of story - my turbo doesn't really boost before this in 5th.  If I exceed 100km/h or am going up a steep hill, then it becomes a turbo car with a potential 300kw that I may or may not need for a few minutes.

So yes, a Neo can handle +300kw, but its all about your environment, how you use it and your driving style.  I have 50,000 on my Gtst and have had no problems, but I did set up for it with a good turbo and supporting mods, so if mine can then the Neo certainly can.

Note that I am ignoring any form of showing off or street racing, you do that then whatever happens is ALL your fault. 

You make a good point, how often am i going to use 320kw on a daily driver with just normal day to day driving.

You can easily put 300kW down without issue, if you know what you're doing to the geometry of the rear end and also pairing it up to decent mechanical LSD (none of this homo locked or shimmed business).

Putting 400kW down starts to get hard.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...