Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Yes you can.  Lift is the answer to both.  Longer duration + dialling them in to boost the midrange more than the top will also help both.

 twin scroll big single, done.

 twin scroll big single, done.


Turbo
Manifold
Ext Wastegate
Downpipe
Custom Oil and water lines
Possibly fuel pump upgrade
Injectors

It's a bit more than just "done" heh! and nearly everyone who fits one says yeah they are great but they don't transform it in the low and midrange. It's mildly better in those areas agreed and higher up power is better butnot everyone wants to go that route. I had a gtx3582r sat there when I bought my 32gtr but decided to stay on the twins altho mainly that was nostalgia and keeping the stock layout.
I agree tho it's a serious way to improve all over but it's also £££
21 hours ago, anthonymcgrath said:

 


Turbo
Manifold
Ext Wastegate
Downpipe
Custom Oil and water lines
Possibly fuel pump upgrade
Injectors

It's a bit more than just "done" heh! and nearly everyone who fits one says yeah they are great but they don't transform it in the low and midrange. It's mildly better in those areas agreed and higher up power is better butnot everyone wants to go that route. I had a gtx3582r sat there when I bought my 32gtr but decided to stay on the twins altho mainly that was nostalgia and keeping the stock layout.
I agree tho it's a serious way to improve all over but it's also £££

 

I agree its not a cheap exercise. But i can tell you now that's a crock^^^ an EFR changes absolutely EVERYTHING about the car. The throttle response, the extra grunt and torque down low, the transient response... It completely transforms  the car from idle to redline. DOESN'T  make it a top end screamer at all! That's old school "twin turbo propoganda" 

Do not get me wrong if you like the twins for the stock look etc thats fine i get that. I really do.

But honestly if you are modding because you want more grunt and a nicer drive throw the twins in the bin. Its a single for the win. An EFR will blow the weeds out of a ANY sized twins from the basement to redline ?

 

  • Like 1
On 2017-5-28 at 0:03 AM, anthonymcgrath said:

 


Turbo
Manifold
Ext Wastegate
Downpipe
Custom Oil and water lines
Possibly fuel pump upgrade
Injectors

It's a bit more than just "done" heh! and nearly everyone who fits one says yeah they are great but they don't transform it in the low and midrange. It's mildly better in those areas agreed and higher up power is better butnot everyone wants to go that route. I had a gtx3582r sat there when I bought my 32gtr but decided to stay on the twins altho mainly that was nostalgia and keeping the stock layout.
I agree tho it's a serious way to improve all over but it's also £££

 

It does transform the low down, mid range, if setup correctly. I've seen potato setups with twin scroll manifold, twin gates all going into an open scroll turbo. Also have seen the other way around too.

It's not really the turbo, I recently changed to an EFR (on a 2.8) and the difference is not as crazy as people are saying.


However, there is notable little differences that come from switching to a better manifold, better housings, simpler setup, etc. The "EFR is god" is only a part of this really. You will get similar results from going TS GTX3582 for example if happy to wind it up.

Is it better than twins? Yeah. Twins honestly are only really good if the circumstance is "They are already on the car"

If you are pushing for power, ever, or even wanting the "Best" setup for the power your twins are currently making, remove the twins and go single.
It's a question of setup and technology. Don't polish the turd. Don't refine a setup for old turbos. Don't get 'the best cams' for -5's. Replace the setup. Use stock cams and a more modern turbo/manifold setup. This is the smart way forward.

You could of course go for a nice new twin manifold for twin new tech turbos but there's nearly no point at all doing that unless you'd rather just burn money for no reason.

Yes you can.  Lift is the answer to both.  Longer duration + dialling them in to boost the midrange more than the top will also help both.

So on a stock head with -5s what would be the max lift and and duration.
As a drop in cam ?

Or better just to build the head ie. O/S valves better springs n port n polish

Better to get more displacement, P&P, better valve springs, etc.. won't magically give you the low->mid range you are hoping for.

What you could do (my honest suggestion) is to get a cam gear, dial in more advance on the intake side and see if you can get your -5 turbos on a little earlier.

1 hour ago, pol1on1 said:


So on a stock head with -5s what would be the max lift and and duration.
As a drop in cam ?

Or better just to build the head ie. O/S valves better springs n port n polish

I don't know what the max is on a stock RB26 head.  Or on any of the heads actually.  This is one to do your own googling on, or ask a workshop who has a history of camming them up.  There are a bunch of different limits imposed by the sides of the lifter bores, the binding point on the valve springs, the piston clearance.....and all of these can be altered by various mods.  Putting in aggressive cams immediately points to putting in better valve springs, which can immediately alleviate the binding problem (for example).  Beyond a certain lobe size you have to machine some clearance out of the top of the lifter bores.  Different valve/piston clearance issues occur depending on overall cam timing.  These are all best dealt with while playing with the engine in pieces or by trawling the already posted knowledge base on here and the rest of the net.  I'm sure the stock limits are equally findable.

  • Like 1
4 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

It's not really the turbo, I recently changed to an EFR (on a 2.8) and the difference is not as crazy as people are saying.


However, there is notable little differences that come from switching to a better manifold, better housings, simpler setup, etc. The "EFR is god" is only a part of this really. You will get similar results from going TS GTX3582 for example if happy to wind it up.

Is it better than twins? Yeah. Twins honestly are only really good if the circumstance is "They are already on the car"

If you are pushing for power, ever, or even wanting the "Best" setup for the power your twins are currently making, remove the twins and go single.
It's a question of setup and technology. Don't polish the turd. Don't refine a setup for old turbos. Don't get 'the best cams' for -5's. Replace the setup. Use stock cams and a more modern turbo/manifold setup. This is the smart way forward.

You could of course go for a nice new twin manifold for twin new tech turbos but there's nearly no point at all doing that unless you'd rather just burn money for no reason.

How many km's have you done in the car? 

On 2017-5-27 at 4:38 AM, Piggaz said:

250 kw at 4000 RPM out of a 2.6 using -5's? You're going to struggle, mate.

Whats the rest of the setup? Head been touched?

* I would STRONGLY suggest not running -5's up around 450 Kw + at the treads. They will not last! 

Are you suggesting they fail with a belly full of boost?  Notice if thats still the case with steel bearing cartridges?

58 minutes ago, Roy said:

Are you suggesting they fail with a belly full of boost?  Notice if thats still the case with steel bearing cartridges?

I don't know anyone with the new guts TBH. Nicks rear failed at Sandown at 24 psi (was on a 3.0). <10,000 kms total work. My rear was also dead with even less kms done. Both older cartridges though.

49 minutes ago, Mick_o said:

I reckon you should practice what you preach Johnny lol :)

at least I'm half way there LOL... Got the single part right and a divided OEM manifold with both pulses split to a single gate hahaha

Preachers usually don't practice - you know that... look at some of the world's most "well respected" high up there people (trying to be as neutral as possible so no one has a sads and bombs my house).

Anyhow, I'm sure my setup will leave many twin "built" 2.6L guys very sads... whenever it gets completed. Even my old setup left many twin 2.6L boys sad as fk!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers)
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
    • OK, Step 3, if you need to remove the valve body, either to replace it, the TCM, or to do a more complete drain.  First, you need to disconnect the TCM input wires, they are about half way up the transmission on the drivers side. One plug and the wires are out of the way, but there is also a spring clip that stops the socket from sliding back into the transmission. On my car the spring clip was easy to get, but the socket was really stuck in the o-ring of the transmission housing and took some.....persuasion. You can see both the plug to remove (first) and the spring clip (second) in this pic Incidentally, right next to the plug, you can see where the casting has allowance for a dispstick/filler which Nissan decided not to provide. there is a cap held on with a 6mm head bolt that you can remove to overfill it (AMS recommend a 1.5l overfill). Final step before the big mess, remove the speed sensor that is clipped to the valve body at the rear of the box.  Then removal of the Valve Body. For this the USDM Q50 workshop manual has a critical diagram: There are a billion bolts visible. Almost all of them do not need to be removed, just the 14 shown on the diagram. Even so, I both removed one extra, and didn't check which length bolt came from which location (more on that later....). Again it is worth undoing the 4 corners first, but leaving them a couple of turns in to hold the unit up....gravity is not your friend here and trans oil will be going everywhere. Once the corners are loose but still in remove all the other 10 bolts, then hold the valve body up with 1 hand while removing the final 4. Then, everything just comes free easily, or like in my case you start swearing because that plug is stuck in the casing. Done, the valve body and TCM are out
    • OK, so if you are either going for the bigger fluid change or are changing the valve body which includes the Transmission Control Module (TCM), first you should have both a new gasket 31397-1XJ0A and a torque wrench that can work down to 8Nm (very low, probably a 1/4 drive one). You can probably get by without either, but I really didn't want to pull it all apart together due to a leak. First, you now need that big oil pan. The transmission pan is 450 long x 350 wide, and it will probably leak on all sides, so get ready for a mess. There are 24x 6mm headed bolts holding the pan on. I undid the 2 rear corners, then screwed those bolts back in a couple of turns to let the pan go low at that end, then removed all the middle bolts on each side. Then, undo the front corner bolts slowly while holding the pan up, and 80% of the fluid will head out the rear. From there, remove the remaining bolts and the pan is off. You can see it is still dripping oil absolutely everywhere...it dripped all night.... I got another couple of litres when I removed the pan, and then another few when I removed the valve body - all up another 4l on top of the 3 already dropped in step 1.
×
×
  • Create New...