Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Should really go talk to a gearbox&diff specialist who might have knowledge of the internals of these active diffs to find out what they think it would take to jam one of the available mech centres in. When you get right down to it, they are still an R200 case and otherwise very similar. Maybe it's just the side bearings spacing or something that makes it hard, and with a little effort or shim/spacer swappsies or use of a centre intended for a Toyota.something else or any of a bunch of hopefully not difficult things, make something work.

Ideally you'd want to use the original stubs and half shafts, but if you had to swap to something else, say the Nismo ones that come with Nismo centres, that would surely have to be palatable enough to the wealthy GTR owner with a bung active diff.

Edited by GTSBoy
26 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

What is wrong with the active LSD?

Like all Nissan electronic control ideas of the era, the technology wasn't as good as the idea, and after 25 years, they don't work properly (as in, not even as well as they worked when they were new).

Even in the EVOs, which at about EVO9 era (ie much later than GTRs) had something very similar, the active diff is a piece of shit that everone who drives them hard wants to rip out and replace with the simple mech diff out of an RS. They offer very changeable performance and you can't trust them to always give you the drive you need.

HICAS sucks. The active diffs suck. Viscous diffs suck. Ceramic turbos suck. There is a lot of suck to be removed from these cars.

36 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Like all Nissan electronic control ideas of the era, the technology wasn't as good as the idea, and after 25 years, they don't work properly (as in, not even as well as they worked when they were new).

Even in the EVOs, which at about EVO9 era (ie much later than GTRs) had something very similar, the active diff is a piece of shit that everone who drives them hard wants to rip out and replace with the simple mech diff out of an RS. They offer very changeable performance and you can't trust them to always give you the drive you need.

HICAS sucks. The active diffs suck. Viscous diffs suck. Ceramic turbos suck. There is a lot of suck to be removed from these cars.

Ceramic turbos suck admittedly if you want to run more than 1 bar boost but it seems to me that HICAS and the A-LSD are more suffering from relatively archaic control systems than actual problems with the actuators. I have a feeling if you could put in modern sensors and modern control algorithms these systems would not be as maligned as they are now. 

41 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

HICAS and the A-LSD are more suffering from relatively archaic control systems than actual problems with the actuators. I have a feeling if you could put in modern sensors and modern control algorithms these systems would not be as maligned as they are now. 

Yuh, but that's the point. They sucked when new and they only got suckier as they aged and wore and stopped working even as well they originally did (which was not that well).

Aussies have been living with this shit for >20 years. We have no rose-tinted glasses when it comes to this sort of piss poor engineering.

11 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Yuh, but that's the point. They sucked when new and they only got suckier as they aged and wore and stopped working even as well they originally did (which was not that well).

Aussies have been living with this shit for >20 years. We have no rose-tinted glasses when it comes to this sort of piss poor engineering.

Right, but the point is that it's possible to have a HICAS and A-LSD controller that does a lot better, much like the replacement ATTESA controllers out there. The electric HICAS systems, properly refreshed, are probably not that far off from a modern 4WS system in the actuator, just stone-age era design in the control logic. The A-LSD seems to be comparable in that regard, lots of modern cars have actively controlled LSDs as well. 

Yeah, but you're arguing that it could be better. As in could be made better.

it wasn't made good to start with and it has only gotten worse. The only active LSDs that have been of any value are in the last 10 years or so, and they only turn up on very expensive cars and they rely on the massive increase in computer power to get the job done. The shitty 3-bit half analogue bullshit used in the early Japanese versions was not up to the task. Same with 4ws. Only comes on expensive cars (Porsches, various supercars, etc), for the same reasons. And, in 10 years when all those cars have a few miles on them and it starts malfunctioning, it will be a f**king nightmare for the owners

Normal cars don't need that shit. More to the point, people who want to flog a Skyline (ie, not a normal car, because we're all modding the f**k out of them to make them "track") around want something hard edged and reliable/repeatable.

And the whole argument will go away soon because when all cars are electric then your get per wheel torque vectoring for free anyway.

Yep frigged around with this system back in 2009 and posted what I was going to do in the A-LSD section.

Worked very well in the end but I have to agree with the vast majority for the amount of effort to get it to work it would be better to get rid of it. 

It’s definitely possible to retrofit modern ABS controllers to these old cars, so why not try and improve A-LSD and HICAS control? Bosch Motorsport sells an M5 ABS kit that can do some incredibly trick stuff, people have retrofitted these systems into stuff like SW20 MR2s. HICAS might be difficult but not impossible to improve upon.

The A-LSD controller is also definitely possible to improve upon. Nismo did it for real in the Super Taikyu cars so they weren’t a glorified gimmick. The HICAS was disabled and the yaw sensor was wired to the ATTESA controller.

Edited by joshuaho96

Edits seem to disable themselves after some time, I found an interesting thesis paper on the subject of A-LSD and TVD control, could be interesting: https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/Vehicle_handling_control_using_active_differentials/9219482

The reason to not try to upgrade the brains is that the hardware is a million years old and failing. Who wants to have to find alternative pumps, solenoids, and all the other shit? Just dump the electronic crap, retro in known good analogue equipment and know that you're not overcapitalising on a 30 year old dirty Datsun.

Edited by GTSBoy
10 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

The reason to not try to upgrade the brains is that the hardware is a million years old and failing. Who wants to have to find alternative pumps, solenoids, and all the other shit? Just dump the electronic crap, retro in known good analogue equipment and know that you're not overcapitalising on a 30 year old dirty Datsun.

It's a little late to not overcapitalize on a 30 year old shitbox, I'm in way too deep at this point. My car already has an A-LSD anyways so rebuild is probably cheaper than doing a full mechanical diff conversion.

1 hour ago, BK said:

No it's not regarding rebuilding and for the result, here anyway. I have a Quaife arse end in the 32 and I wish I could have that in the 33.

I still think that if someone actually went through the effort to get a modern control system and not whatever half-assed solution Nissan shoved out the door the A-LSD would be a clear step up. Many modern cars still use electro-hydraulic A-LSDs, stuff like the F430, 458, 991 GT3 PDK variants, etc. The sensors are basically all there already, it's just not being used properly.

 

  • 6 months later...

I've also got the a-lsd on my '97. never really noticed the diff. probably because i've never taken it to the tracks.

If it ever starts causing problems do you think it's better to get a modern KAAZ 1.5 SUPER Q or keep it? the torque split / pump device is apparently 4.5k brand new from nissan. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good luck on the weekend mate
    • Must have been an absolute nightmare to drive when the power steer was out, the rack ratio/wheel size/caster is all set up for power assistance
    • Welcome to SAU, what are you looking at buying?
    • I checked the injectors again (1 and 2, since they’re easiest to access) to make sure they weren’t clogged. Even though the entire fuel system had been cleaned, I wanted to be certain. Everything looked clean, so I reinstalled and connected everything. When I started the car to confirm everything was okay, it immediately revved up high, so I shut it off straight away. I checked to see if I’d missed a vacuum hose or something, but everything was connected. On the second attempt, the car ran without the high idle, but I noticed a distinct “compressed air” sound coming from the engine bay. Tracing the sound, I pushed injector #6 forward slightly and the noise stopped — it turned out it wasn’t seated properly, despite the fuel rail being bolted down. While holding it in place, the car idled steadily without stalling and ran for over 5 minutes. At this point, I pulled all six injectors out just in case I hadn’t seated them correctly or dirt had gotten onto the O-rings. Unfortunately, I discovered that I had damaged 3 out of 6 injectors (the OEM 270cc ones) during installation. So yes, this was my fault. Since only the pintle caps were damaged, I’ve ordered a Fuel Injector Service Kit from NZEFI to refurbish them. In the meantime, I reinstalled my new injectors – the car now idles fine for over 15 minutes without stalling. I have not attempted to drive it so far. It’s not perfect yet, as it hesitates when the throttle is pressed, but it’s a big improvement. Unplugging the IACV with the new injectors idles at around 800rpm, even with the IACV screw tightened fully. But this is probably due to tune.
    • I wanted to try and preserve the front bumper as long as possible, they're not cheap and are made to order in Japan. Taking inspiration from my previous K11 Micra build where I made an undertray for the Impul bumper, I did the same for this BN Sports bumper but a little slimmed down.  This time round I only made a 'skid plate' (if that's the correct wording/term) for just the bumper surface area, the Micra version covered the gap like an undertray. Starting off with a sheet of mild steel approx. 0.9mm thick 4ft x 2ft in size. I traced around the bumper, cut it out and cleaned the edges. Luckily I was able to get two halves from one piece of metal In the video I installed it as is, but I've since then I've removed it to spray and add a rubber edging trim. The rubber trim is suitable for 1-2mm and it's a really nice tight fit. The bolts had to be loosened due to the plates being too tight against the bumper, the trim wouldn't push on I used some stainless M6 flat headed bolts for a flusher finish (rather than hex heads poking down), I believe this style fastener is used for furniture too incase you struggle to source some. The corner's are a little wider, but this may be an advantage incase I get close to bumping it  The front grill got some attention, finally getting round to repairing it. Upon removal one fixing pulled itself out of the plastic frame, one side is M8 that fixes inside of the frame, where as the other side is M5. Not knowing I could get replacements, I cut down an M8 bolt, threaded it inside the frame along with a decent amount of JB Weld.  The mesh was replaced to match the bumper. One hole on the bonnet/hood had to be drilled out to 8mm to accommodate the new stud, once the glue had set it could be refitted. I think the reason the grill was double meshed was to hide the horn/bonnet latch (which makes sense) but I much prefer it matching the bumper Bumper refitted and it's looking much better IMO The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVZP35io9MA
×
×
  • Create New...