Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BK said:

There is no such thing as an RB26 N1 crank, contrary to what people are advertising. 12200-05U03 is just the latest R34 long nose crank that superceded previous part numbers, used in all RB26. Kudos has in stock for about the same price through Amayama.

The N1 crank in R33 was the same previous part in all 33 RB26s, 12200-05U02.

Ok, this makes sense, in the last month or so, I’ve seen people and shops advertising cranks as N1, and as far as I was aware, there were 2 versions of the rb26 crank, the long nose and short nose, I thought maybe it was something I haven’t heard of before, the description threw me. 

55CD44A4-B8D2-4C13-A36A-AF8915AE60B9.png

Edited by Old man 32 GTR
Add photo
On 19/09/2020 at 6:15 PM, Unzipped Composites said:

Can't help for a crank source in Canada, hopefully someone else here can.

 

Oil cooler, get a Setrab or Mocal 19 or 25 row with minimum AN10 fittings. One of those coolers plus lines and fittings should come in under $600 for sure.

 

N1 pump has higher flow over standard pump, so I would still get an N1 pump. If you want to reuse your gears, it also depends what pump your gears are from, N1 and standard are different size gears. Personally, I would get a new N1 pump, and if your gears don't suit it then new gears as well.

Does that after market setup help for street use? I saw lots of +600hp setup still using factory oil coolers 

how to tell if it’s n1pump or standard?

On 20/09/2020 at 2:09 AM, BK said:

There is no such thing as an RB26 N1 crank, contrary to what people are advertising. 12200-05U03 is just the latest R34 long nose crank that superceded previous part numbers, used in all RB26. Kudos has in stock for about the same price through Amayama.

The N1 crank in R33 was the same previous part in all 33 RB26s, 12200-05U02.

I realized some of them  also sell these new blocks as n1 block for very cheap price but they’re actually standard blocks

1 hour ago, Amin206 said:

I realized some of them  also sell these new blocks as n1 block for very cheap price but they’re actually standard blocks

That's even worse as the 24U N1 block is a completely different part. As far as the N1 oil pump, the backing plate is different to the standard one.

bg3.jpg

  • Like 1
2 hours ago, Amin206 said:

Does that after market setup help for street use? I saw lots of +600hp setup still using factory oil coolers 

 

 

Yes of course, it is better. The OEM cooler isn't actually a cooler, it is a heat exchanger. More for warming the oil up quickly than keeping it cool.

 

For street use, I would install a thermostat with the oil cooler as well,  to help get the oil up to temp. Especially in Canada. 

  • Like 1

So I checked the oil pump and mine is a standard one. 
This project is getting so expensive and I’m running out of budget... 

how about getting the standard oil pump again and use my upgraded gears cause if i get n1 pump I have to get new gears which is $600-700 

so standard pump + upgraded gears vs n1 pump without upgraded gears?

35 minutes ago, Amin206 said:

So I checked the oil pump and mine is a standard one. 
This project is getting so expensive and I’m running out of budget... 

how about getting the standard oil pump again and use my upgraded gears cause if i get n1 pump I have to get new gears which is $600-700 

so standard pump + upgraded gears vs n1 pump without upgraded gears?

 

Kind of your call to make. If you only intend to use it as a street car, it may be ok. But don't forget that the oil pump is the achilles heel of the RB. Is that really where you want to be drawing the line for the budget? 

 

There is also no real need for spline drive gears, nothing wrong with billet flat drive gears unless you plan to live on the limiter. 

  • Like 1

As above is completely correct. The engine is out, now is the time to address the oil issues. I'd be hesitant to reuse you existing pump, but I see where you're going. Buying a new N1 pump and then new billet gears for it is approaching the cost of just buying a new Nitto oil pump.

  • Like 2
6 hours ago, Amin206 said:
This project is getting so expensive and I’m running out of budget... 

Welcome to the tuff and unforgiving world of owning a gtr.

shit gets expensive real quick but the best advice is to do it once and do it right.

it might mean saving longer and having it off the road longer but at the end you have peace of mind it’s less likely to let you down in the future compared to cutting corners

  • Like 1
5 hours ago, BK said:

As above is completely correct. The engine is out, now is the time to address the oil issues. I'd be hesitant to reuse you existing pump, but I see where you're going. Buying a new N1 pump and then new billet gears for it is approaching the cost of just buying a new Nitto oil pump.

 

BUT - with a Nitto pump you NEED an extended sump. With an N1 pump/billet gears in a street car, you could get away with an OEM sump. 

 

Not sure if the OP already has an extended sump from the first couple of builds, then a Nitto pump is maybe a cost effective option. But if he needs the extended sump then thats another $600-$1000 on top of the price of the Nitto pump.

  • Like 1
5 hours ago, Unzipped Composites said:

 

BUT - with a Nitto pump you NEED an extended sump. With an N1 pump/billet gears in a street car, you could get away with an OEM sump. 

 

Not sure if the OP already has an extended sump from the first couple of builds, then a Nitto pump is maybe a cost effective option. But if he needs the extended sump then thats another $600-$1000 on top of the price of the Nitto pump.

More like $1100 - $2000 for a good extended sump. On my blue 32 it has a Nitto pump and a Lewis engines 8+ litre sump as it's a big dollar Nitto 2.8. But I'm not sold that it's an absolute 100% deal breaker to run a Nitto pump without a big sump. Flow rate major increases are really only up in the high revs, 7000+. They mention long nose crank or crank collar as definite must, but not absolutely, MUST run a bigger sump. Increases are as below. What is not mentioned is that the flow rates quoted are at the dual spring higher pressure, I guess because the pump flows the same at a given rpm, and the relief valve will only bypass very high in the rpm if set to 120psi. It is possible to drop the pressure to the engine bearing and head supply though running one spring, which will infact decrease the flow rate at the high rpm range when the flow output really becomes substantially more with the higher 120psi relief valve setting. 75psi will definitely make the flow lower to the bearings at the mid to higher rpm range as the valve will bypass earlier, returning excess oil directly to the sump. How much lower the flow at the bearings will be I'm not exactly sure, as it's definitely not a linear ratio and I'm not a fluid dynamics engineer. @GTSBoy care to have a crack at the flow differential calc ?

Just to add to info below Tomei pumps are 56L/min at 6000rpm for comparison sake. Factory is still 46L/min at 6000rpm, indicating factory relief valve is already open providing no more increased flow above 6000rpm.

 

FLOW RATES (LITRES / MIN)
ENGINE RPM FACTORY PUMP NITTO HIGH VOLUME PUMP
750 4.6 6.5
2200 15.3 20.2
7000 46.5 64.8
PRESSURE RELIEF VALUE (RELEASE PRESSURE)
Dual Springs 120 psi *
Outer Spring Only 75 psi *
* Denotes Approximate Maximum Oil Pressure
NITTO OIL PUMP GEAR VS FACTORY GEAR DIMENSIONS
DIMENSION FACTORY NITTO DIFFERENCE
Outer Gear Diameter 76.85MM 81.50MM 6% LARGER
Outer Gear Width 11.00MM 14.35MM 23% LARGER
Tooth To Outer Wall Width 2.55MM 4.85MM 47% LARGER

On the second 32 were doing now we've built engine already with a stock sump and Nitto oil pump. We're confident it'll be ok as a mainly street and sometimes street drag car with the additional stuff fitted to optimise the stock sump volume restriction:

Head 1.1mm oil supply restrictor in block (stock is 2.0mm), Tomei sump baffle at oil pickup, modified enlarged sump oil return holes, Franklin engineering AN10 rear head drain/breather to sump, twin AN10 rocker cover breathers to catch can with separate AN10 sump return and an HKS 13 row oil cooler with 70deg thermostat filter relocation.

This will be fine, although the cooler and line setup also does add nearly an extra litre to the oil volume for a bit of an increase in capacity, restrictor tries to reduce as much oil being pumped out of sump to head and then the rest is really to facilitate getting the oil back to the sump faster - so it's not exactly a "stock" sump setup I guess.

Look at the end of the day if you can go a bigger sump it's always better, even with the lower flowing standard or N1 pumps. Definitely no argument there. If you can go bigger, do it.

  • Like 1

120 psi increased from 75 psi should see about 25% more flow through the same restriction (ie, the same engine).

So, if the 64.8 l/min flow rate is with 2 springs, then one spring should flow about 52. If the 64.8 l/min flow rate is with 1 spring then 2 springs will give f**king lots.

43 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

120 psi increased from 75 psi should see about 25% more flow through the same restriction (ie, the same engine).

So, if the 64.8 l/min flow rate is with 2 springs, then one spring should flow about 52. If the 64.8 l/min flow rate is with 1 spring then 2 springs will give f**king lots.

The 64.8 l/min at 7000rpm is definitely at 120psi (2 springs - checked with CRD when I did mine and I have 2 springs fitted). A stock pump looks like it taps out at 46.5 l/min at 67psi on 6000rpm from the service manual. So with the 75 psi (1 spring) at 52 l/min it is lower than a Tomei pump (56 l/min) and only a slight increase in flow and pressure over a standard pump, just heaps stronger. I guess that's why they give you that option to go lower.

On 21/09/2020 at 8:50 PM, Unzipped Composites said:

 

Kind of your call to make. If you only intend to use it as a street car, it may be ok. But don't forget that the oil pump is the achilles heel of the RB. Is that really where you want to be drawing the line for the budget? 

 

There is also no real need for spline drive gears, nothing wrong with billet flat drive gears unless you plan to live on the limiter. 

If the Upgraded gears don’t have that much of benefit then I’ll go with new n1 pump without upgraded gears just for street use. 

41 minutes ago, Amin206 said:

If the Upgraded gears don’t have that much of benefit then I’ll go with new n1 pump without upgraded gears just for street use. 

 

No no, don't misunderstand me! You definitely want billet gears, 100%. But they don't need to be the spline drive type gears that came out of your pump. You can get the direct OEM flat drive style gears for a good bit cheaper than the spline drive style, and for street use they will serve you just as well.

 

For example. You can get the flat drive billet gears from Platinum Racing Products for $470:

 

https://platinumracingproducts.com/collections/rb-accessories/products/prp-billet-oil-pump-gears-nissan-rb20-rb25-rb26-rb30-oil-pump

 

Or you can get their spline drive billet gears for $770:

 

https://platinumracingproducts.com/products/prp-spline-drive-kit?_pos=1&_sid=529d7da06&_ss=r&variant=36097408893096

 

If you're feeling super cashed up, you can even get the Supertec spline drive kit for $1200:

 

https://platinumracingproducts.com/products/supertec-racing-oem-oil-pump-spline-drive-kit-rb25-rb26-rb30?_pos=2&_sid=529d7da06&_ss=r

 

 

 

If it were me, I would get a new N1 pump, and go the OEM flat drive style billet gears, and save 300+ bucks over the spline drive version. But I would NOT run the OEM sintered metal gears that come with the N1 pump.

  • Like 2

Yes definitely run at least billet gears, whether that's a gearset or a Nitto pump, whatever. The standard oil pump actually runs bigger gears than an N1 too FYI, and are preferred by some engine builders because of their housings.

Don't forget though standard or N1, they still have the shitty cast backing plate which will still flex even with billet gears. Hence why a Nitto pump with its billet gears and billet backing plate make them much better than just a gearset, and are worth every cent.

  • Like 1
7 hours ago, BK said:

Yes definitely run at least billet gears, whether that's a gearset it a Nitto pump whatever. The standard oil pump actually runs bigger gears than an N1 too FYI, and are preferred by some engine builders because of their housings.

Don't forget though standard or N1, they still have the shitty cast backing plate which will still flex even with billet gears. Hence why a Nitto pump with its billet gears and billet backing plate make them much better than just a gearset, and are worth every cent.

Only $230 for a Supertec billet backing plate for the N1 pump. That's the route I've gone down with my build, billet gears and backing plate and I've got a Neo so N1 pump from factory. Obviously if you're buying a new pump, then you're getting pretty close to the cost of a Nitto, so its a toss up. 

  • Like 1

Well thanks to you guys I’m learning more about this expensive engine... 

Some people in this forum mentioned these spline gears need accurate oil pump adjustment after installation and without adjustment risk of breaking the gears are very high so as I’m looking for no trouble I think I’ll go with billet gears on factory collar. Anyone know if they need adjustment as well? Or just put the gears in there and bolt it back on?

also still not sure n1 or standard pump? If the standard has bigger gears then why pay more for n1? Is it proved that n1 has better oil flow?

 

1 hour ago, Amin206 said:

why pay more for n1? Is it proved that n1 has better oil flow?

Exactly. I see no need to run an N1 pump over a stock 33/34 GTR pump. I haven't seen concrete evidence of N1 flow / pressure specs. Best info I could dig up was 47 l/min at 6000rpm, 75psi, but that is still hearsay. The main reason for getting an N1 pump back in the day was they did have a harder gearset than stock (someone on here independently tested it), but if you're going to put billet gears in what the point ? I know @Sydneykid back in the day used to advise to use the stocker over an N1 and Darren from Lewis engines, who builds some pretty tuff and reliable gear, advises of using the stock housing with gears over an N1 pump. I've only used one once 11+ years ago and wouldn't bother again with them against a stock housing if gearsets are being replaced. I have no idea why people even bother with N1 oil pumps when everyone knows basically nothing about them.

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...