Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I drive mine weekly(when its working haha) and sometimes to work. The loud car in the carpark is already a thing, idling it would be the next amusement for people. Also who wants to stay at work longer than they have to. 

 

*off to understand oil pre-heaters ....google time. 

On 23/7/2022 at 12:57 PM, joshuaho96 said:

I can't imagine idling a car for 10 minutes any time I want to go somewhere but I'm not really the target audience for a billet block anyways.

It’s not that hard to waste 10 minutes. Start the car, open the garage, move the car that’s in front of it, remove bollards, check oil temperature gauge and you’ll be pretty close 

Sooooo I re-watched this video and I have questions ....

 

On a second watch this really does look like a video beat up of N1 and sales pitch for braces.

 

The N1 block is claimed (my understanding)

>Have 1mm thicker deck - Confirmed in video

>Have higher Nickel content ... not addressed

>Be stronger around cylinder 3 and 4 - not addressed other than visual inspection 

>Have modified internal water and oil passages for better flow - not addressed other than visual inspection

 

The video did claim it was less hard, which I thought would suggest it has nickel, as nickel is less hard than cast steel ?

Does hardness really stop a block cracking ?  or is metallurgy a thing here ?

I would of thought a hardness test of a billet block would be 30% less than a cast ?

 

Also not aware that N1 was ever supposed to be thicker cylinder walls, so that is expected to be the same.

 

THOUGHTS ???

 

 

 

On 7/26/2022 at 2:53 PM, Butters said:

The video did claim it was less hard, which I thought would suggest it has nickel, as nickel is less hard than cast steel ?

Hardness is really not an indicator of compressive or tensile strength. It is somewhat inversely proportional to toughness in that harder materials are usually more brittle. This is one of the key complaints I have with the idea of hardness testing cast iron blocks to determine how "good" they are.

Further, just because there is a different proportion of a given element in a cast iron (yes, iron, not steel) doesn't necessarily mean that any of the mechanical properties of the resulting cast iron will scale up and down in the same direction as the mechanical properties of the element. One of the whole points of alloys is that the alloying elements often to interesting and unexpected things when combined into the crystal matrix. Nevertheless, pure metallic nickel is about 1000 Brinell and typical grey cast irons are about 250 Brinell. So, Ni is not softer than cast iron. Addition of nickel can close on double the hardness of cast irons - if hardness is what you are after. The problem is that nickel is also used to increase high temperature resistance of cast irons, and when you do so, it tends to decrease the hardness. So ask yourself....why would Nissan add more Ni to the cast iron spec for the N1 block?

I would suggest that hardness is not necessarily the most desirable property of a cast iron in an engine block application. Tensile strength and toughness would be higher on the list. Tensile strength only inasmuch as it contributes to the stiffness of the finished casting. The properties relating to castability (how it flows, etc) would likely also be higher. Vibration resistance is an inherent property of cast iron that you would not likely choose to reduce.

On 7/26/2022 at 2:53 PM, Butters said:

I would of thought a hardness test of a billet block would be 30% less than a cast ?

Well, with a billet block being made from aluminium alloys, like 6061, which is only around 100 Brinell. So....

On 7/26/2022 at 1:23 PM, Butters said:

Sooooo I re-watched this video and I have questions ....

 

On a second watch this really does look like a video beat up of N1 and sales pitch for braces.

 

The N1 block is claimed (my understanding)

>Have 1mm thicker deck - Confirmed in video

>Have higher Nickel content ... not addressed

>Be stronger around cylinder 3 and 4 - not addressed other than visual inspection 

>Have modified internal water and oil passages for better flow - not addressed other than visual inspection

 

The video did claim it was less hard, which I thought would suggest it has nickel, as nickel is less hard than cast steel ?

Does hardness really stop a block cracking ?  or is metallurgy a thing here ?

I would of thought a hardness test of a billet block would be 30% less than a cast ?

 

Also not aware that N1 was ever supposed to be thicker cylinder walls, so that is expected to be the same.

 

THOUGHTS ???

 

 

 

At one point Mr Dodge made a comment on his page saying that the N1 blocks are worst than 05U's. 

I asked an open question simply from curiosity and wanting to learn, for every handful of N1's or 05U's how many of them crack he got angry and messaged me in a split second demanding I don't ask baited questions 

The N1 block was made for cars competing in the N1 Endurance racing series, with a budget to go top level racing so surely some thought went into it regarding what material to use or input of someone clued up. 

If you goto a place that has build hundreds of 26's and you want high power likely they spec an N1 block.   

There are a few guys who have had a PRP brace on 05U's and ended up with exterior cracks, how well the brace helps a brand new 05U block though, perhaps there's some merit to it.  When I went to build my engine, given an 05U $3500 plus $1500 Brace plus machining plus shop labour, fitting your not really too far off a N1 block price.  

 

Edited by RB335
  • Like 1

Yes @GTSBoy iron, sorry not sure what was going on in my brain.  Thanks for your reply, good info. 

I thought iron was 4.5 on Mohs and Nickel 4, making it slightly less hard. Appreciate that is considered a less reliable way of measuring hardness. 

On 7/26/2022 at 9:26 PM, khezz said:

The main lesson in that video is that RB30 is king. $500 a through. Stronger, harder, stiffer and there is no replacement for displacement. 

Yes there is ! Its called money.

I used to think that the "there is no replacement for displacement" was a groovy statement in the day but then I got exposed to the F1 Honda engines of the mid to late 80s.

Changed the way I thought a lot !

  • Like 1
On 27/7/2022 at 4:44 AM, PLYNX said:

Yes there is ! Its called money.

I used to think that the "there is no replacement for displacement" was a groovy statement in the day but then I got exposed to the F1 Honda engines of the mid to late 80s.

Changed the way I thought a lot !

Love those old F1 videos. Those drivers had balls. 
 

displacement is still king. All 3 of the 6 second gtrs in Australia use 3.2l engines not 2.6l

Don’t know about money. It’s just easier with a 3.2. Look at top fuellers. They use the biggest displacement allowed. No shortage of cash there or brains. But it’s just easier with a bigger motor. 

  • 6 months later...

So this was a fun watch.

Seems a lot of value in an N1 block over a standard, specially for the power levels that are not going to split bores(1200 + ?) .

It does make you really question the value of a brace.

 

 

He stated the bores are still the problem in the n1 block, it’s the deck and the cracking above the turbo oil feed that’s been improved, also the brace is to stop the main girdle from walking 

23 minutes ago, r32-25t said:

He stated the bores are still the problem in the n1 block, it’s the deck and the cracking above the turbo oil feed that’s been improved, also the brace is to stop the main girdle from walking 

He has stated in previous video that the brace was built for 4wd adaptions. Then they noticed blocks crack less. Yes walk is it's feature but also this from the PRP site. 

"Aftermarket diffs crack blocks! it’s a fact, the Platinum Block brace will not only stop block twist, but stops the diff snapping the block under load, energy is dissipated through your 40mm thick integrated and webbed brace, blocks cracking and snapping become a thing of the past!"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...