Jump to content
SAU Community

Ethanol Content Sensor for Straight E85?


Recommended Posts

Hey all,

 

Is an ethanol content sensor required for an E85 only tune?

I was under the impression it was due to the variable nature of pump E85- which can vary wildy in ethanol content.

I guess my question is- can a tuner compensate for this with a flex fuel sensor or is it not required for straight E85?
 

I just bought one but i'm unsure if I should just return it.

Cheers all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not strictly necessary, because, whilst the wildly "variable nature of pump E85" is a thing, it doesn't really vary so much that it has to be a problem. It can often be as low as 70, from what I understand, and even somewhat higher than 85. But here's the thing. The knock resistance from ethanol content pretty much reaches a maximum somewhere around 45% ethanol content. Thereafter the extra ethanol doesn't really provide much more ability to put in timing, safety from knock, etc. What it does do though is affect the required stoichiometry. For lower E content, you get richer (for a fuel system/table that assumes E85). So you get safer. And slower. Above 85%, unless the tune is pretty close to the edge of being too lean, you should still be fine. So if you want to keep your tune nicely optimised against varying E content, then....you need a sensor.

If it were me, I'd put a sensor in. The downside here is that you must do the full flex tune to get the benefit from it. You have to have a base map on one fuel and another on the opposite extreme of the E content to interpolate against. I wouldn't think that tuning on exactly E85 (or whatever happened to be coming out of the pump that day) would give the ECU anywhere to adjust to based on what the ethanol sensor is saying, unless there's that other fuel's tune in there also.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it depends on whether you are using pump or can e85, the stuff direct from the refinery is pretty strict e85 I understand while the pump stuff varies from season to season to give you a chance starting the car on a cold morning.

I'd 100% put it in if I was even considering some ethanol.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally even if I planned on running straight E85 all the time with no variability to account for cold start I would run a flex fuel sensor purely because any time you switch between pump gas and E85 you'd have to either fully drain the tank. I want to be able to switch to pump gas halfway, end up with E30 or whatever it ends up being and just keep driving without having to deal with AFR trims being all over the place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you were 100% sure that you will never ever run anything other then pump e85, then sure you could get away without running a flex sensor. 

Lets say the car was tuned on a tank of e80 and everything was setup perfectly on that %blend, as you drove the car and the ethanol content varied from e70 to e85 depending on what the fuel bowser was filled with at the time, you would not notice any change in how the car behaves. It would make the same power and drive exactly the same regardless of if it was currently at e70 or e85 or anything in-between. 

The only way you would notice anything is if you had a dash/gauge telling you that something was different, e.g. AFR is  currently 11.3 however when tuned it was 11.5 under the same circumstances. These small changes will be impossible to feel in the way the car actually performs.

So, should you use the flex sensor? I'd say yes, even if it was just to give you the option to use pump 98. There might be a situation in the future you haven't accounted for where you run out of e85 or it's not available for whatever reason, now at least you can still run the car happily on 98. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you run without it, yes.

Should you, probably not.

My car runs 1 as it's flex tuned. I run e85 all the time, may run 98 once a year just to purge the system out.

In Victoria, the ethanol content from United pump e85 seems very consistent, my sensor reads it as 78-79%, have seen 80-81% a couple of times. I haven't verified how accurate my sensor is but wouldn't be too far off. This is over 5 years, never been under or over those figures.

On another note, you could get one of those portable ethanol test kits but you would need to take a sample each time. 

Since you already have the sensor, why not just use it. In future you may decide to run flex and it would be 1 less thing required.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the great replies.

The car plan is straight E85- as the engine isn't in great health with 130psi across all 6 cylinders on a factory 25DET- so low compression.

I want to prolong it while I save up for a rebuild. But I do hope for mid 400whp with E85 in the meantime.

I am thinking about not using the Flex sensor- unless the tuner will drop a bit of 98 in the tank to bring it down to say E60-70- but they'd probably not do this and just tell me to get a flex fuel tune.

I haven't put it in yet and $250 back into my bank account will certainly be beneficial to me right now.

So basically a good idea if running flex, bad/pointless if running straight E85 since it won't effect knock anyway- only stoich point- that's the summary i've got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, CLEM0 said:

Thank you all for the great replies.

The car plan is straight E85- as the engine isn't in great health with 130psi across all 6 cylinders on a factory 25DET- so low compression.

I want to prolong it while I save up for a rebuild. But I do hope for mid 400whp with E85 in the meantime.

I am thinking about not using the Flex sensor- unless the tuner will drop a bit of 98 in the tank to bring it down to say E60-70- but they'd probably not do this and just tell me to get a flex fuel tune.

I haven't put it in yet and $250 back into my bank account will certainly be beneficial to me right now.

So basically a good idea if running flex, bad/pointless if running straight E85 since it won't effect knock anyway- only stoich point- that's the summary i've got.

Why would you want to tune the car on e60-e70?

I don't think anyone said it was bad or pointless to use a flex sensor if running pump e85 100% of the time. 

I would say the summary is closer to - 

* Yes you can run the car on pump e85 without a flex sensor

* There are benefits to using a flex sensor even if you are always on pump e85. It's up to you if you think those benefits are worth the very small outlay to install the flex sensor.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Murray_Calavera said:

Why would you want to tune the car on e60-e70?

I don't think anyone said it was bad or pointless to use a flex sensor if running pump e85 100% of the time. 

I would say the summary is closer to - 

* Yes you can run the car on pump e85 without a flex sensor

* There are benefits to using a flex sensor even if you are always on pump e85. It's up to you if you think those benefits are worth the very small outlay to install the flex sensor.

 

Thank you- that came across better than how I summarised it.

I would not be getting the car tuned on 98, and if E45 and E85 are minimal in regard to knock resistance, then if I got a bad batch of E85 it wouldn't be detrimental to the performance or safety of the car- so essentially unless I do plan to run flex/98, the only benefit i'd get is consistent fuel trims/AFR and more consistent economy/cold starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Install the flex sensor.

One day you're going to rock up to United on a low tank of fuel thinking you'll fill up, then to find out their tanks are empty.

Now you have probably 5L of fuel left in your tank and wonder how you'll get home. That tow truck emergency call out fee + towing fees will cost more than your flex sensor.

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no real downside and it's not strictly required. Caltex used to serve E70 to E85. As Bill mentioned up above, United has been E80-85 pretty much forever. Never ever saw that change. I suppose the offensive price gouging for the product is worth something.

(then again, Ethanol lowers the price of 91... so... they're probably maximizing the 'cheap stuff' by keeping that Ethanol content up in E85)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Murray_Calavera said:

Why would you want to tune the car on e60-e70?

I don't think anyone said it was bad or pointless to use a flex sensor if running pump e85 100% of the time. 

I would say the summary is closer to - 

* Yes you can run the car on pump e85 without a flex sensor

* There are benefits to using a flex sensor even if you are always on pump e85. It's up to you if you think those benefits are worth the very small outlay to install the flex sensor.

 

E30 is popular in my area to bump up octane enough to make enough power on our terrible fuel quality in California while not suffering too much of a range deficit. It also helps with not destroying HPFPs in GDI applications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be aware that a worn set of rings will let more water-filled blowby gases into the sump. You will want to change your oil close to twice as often as would normally be expected for E85, unless you're happy for it to all go to shit down there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2023 at 2:10 PM, GTSBoy said:

Be aware that a worn set of rings will let more water-filled blowby gases into the sump. You will want to change your oil close to twice as often as would normally be expected for E85, unless you're happy for it to all go to shit down there.

Thanks.

I did a wet test and it jumped about 7-8psi. So i'd say rings aren't amazing.

How often would you suggest a change in oil?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

jesus, how much enrichment do you have on cold start? lol...

 

Not sure, I have no need for Expensive-Gouge-Juice anymore, though I do have the capacity.

I remember not needing to touch any of the enrichment tables for start with the ol Haltech PS2000. Would start perfectly with full ethanol in the middle of winter without any issues. Never had any cold start problems at all, or hot start for that matter, was the most overblown 'problem' E85 ever had. At least for me..

But ye, do an oil change then drive for 100km then smell the oil filler cap. It smells like E85 really fast in my experience and isn't an indicator that the oil is ready to be changed yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For sure, bromance with common shit box interests.
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Aren't we already on one? SAU unforgettable bromance.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...