Jump to content
SAU Community

Stagea Dyno Results

Sydneykid

By Sydneykid,
in Four Door Family & Wagoneers

 Share

Recommended Posts

pipster11 Grand Master

pipster11

Posted
Posted
Had a little bit of a dissappointing result at the SAU:SA Dyno day today the M35 only pulled 126 KW :happy: It was on a mainline dyno, which they say under reads - but even so, would've liked a few more numbers. At least Ive got a baseline for future comparisons though.

post-69799-1283568212_thumb.jpg

i thought m35's ran 12psi stock?

you didn't even make it to 10

if its highflowed, its good to about 20psi but 14 will be safe with the stock ecu/boost cut

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 630
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

surfstagea
surfstagea

hey guys, heres a dyno chart from the other day. this is for a fairly stock example, with standard cooler / exhaust, and 10 psi boost. cheers!

Posted Images

scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted
that is nuts Scott.

That would be a real handful in the wet.

Its quite docile actually, only spins up inside wheels in first, I would be stepping out sideways if it had an lsd though.

Of course I dont drive like Craig either. :geek:

andy65b Veteran

andy65b

Posted
Posted
Its quite docile actually, only spins up inside wheels in first, I would be stepping out sideways if it had an lsd though.

Of course I dont drive like Craig either. :geek:

I have the Nismo in my car at the moment and it comes on very strong in the lower rpm and in the Wet + 1st gear + a bit of fun = a very sideways car out of round abouts.....lol

Jetwreck Grand Master

Jetwreck

Posted
Posted
Its quite docile actually, only spins up inside wheels in first, I would be stepping out sideways if it had an lsd though.

Of course I dont drive like Craig either. :)

Oh you will....once you find the love of the LSD and loose the single spinner!!! :P

Jetwreck Grand Master

Jetwreck

Posted
Posted
I have the Nismo in my car at the moment and it comes on very strong in the lower rpm and in the Wet + 1st gear + a bit of fun = a very sideways car out of round abouts.....lol

LOL....at least you can get sideway's at low speeds....I have to wait until I hit 60-70km's!!....lol

pipster11 Grand Master

pipster11

Posted
Posted
just love the way it stay's at about 1000nm's.......nice steady curve up to 300AWKW's as well.

Try that with a RB tractor motor :P

you realise thats tractive torque and the only way to measure engine torque accurately is on an engine dyno? so its not really 1000Nm

still an impressive result, should be even better if you guys get your ecu re-mapper sorted

scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted
you realise thats tractive torque and the only way to measure engine torque accurately is on an engine dyno? so its not really 1000Nm

still an impressive result, should be even better if you guys get your ecu re-mapper sorted

Yep, tractive effort, and 200nm more than the 2j manual supra that was tuned before mine.

V6 FTW... :P

I have given up on the remap, mainly because I will be changing to the VQ35 soon. It looks like I am going down the Haltech platnum pro path.

iamhe77 Grand Master

iamhe77

Posted
Posted (edited)

Awesome result man... especially for a car so well behaved. (Yes I'm jealous)

Maybe you need to get it in an engine dyno to see exactly what nm it is pushing?

Edited by iamhe77
scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted
Awesome result man... especially for a car so well behaved. (Yes I'm jealous)

Maybe you need to get it in an engine dyno to see exactly what nm it is pushing?

Probably easier to just get an RB powered car of similar output on the same dyno for a comparison.

pipster11 Grand Master

pipster11

Posted
Posted
Probably easier to just get an RB powered car of similar output on the same dyno for a comparison.

would be a lot easier

but i think the tractive torque is affected by gear ratios, tyre size and a few other things so it may not be an accurate comparison

scotty nm35 Grand Master

scotty nm35

Posted
Posted
would be a lot easier

but i think the tractive torque is affected by gear ratios, tyre size and a few other things so it may not be an accurate comparison

I think as long as the speed to revs ratio is the same it wont matter. Different gears, diff ratios and tyre sizes will change everything, not to mention auto box and awd etc.

STATUS Grand Master

STATUS

Posted
Posted
Probably easier to just get an RB powered car of similar output on the same dyno for a comparison.
you realise thats tractive torque and the only way to measure engine torque accurately is on an engine dyno? so its not really 1000Nm

still an impressive result, should be even better if you guys get your ecu re-mapper sorted

if only i had the front hubs... we would know in 5 mins.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      What brakes on R34 GTT(Europe)

      By Kapr · Posted

      Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Kinkstaah
      What brakes on R34 GTT(Europe)

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Kapr
      What brakes on R34 GTT(Europe)

      By Kapr · Posted

      Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • niZmO_Man
      Lock up the old for sale / wtb threads.

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • Kinkstaah
      R34 Gtt Wheel Offset Advice

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...