Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Referring to the photo regarding to PFC settings 3. Does any 1 know why my Air Flow settings would have been changed from the default of 100% to 0.0% in all 8 boxes when I was

having every value as 0.0 means correct the load axis to 0

this will make the car run like ass and im surprised it starts

put them all back to 100.0

http://www.paulr33.com/powerfc-emulator/me...t_afm_ramp.html

the value as covered by the pfc hand controller emulator is correction scaling

this influences the final load axis the pfc uses to select IGN/INJ correction off the maps

I have an EL hand controller in my hot little hands.....however both my cars with PFC at at mechanics atm. I am 99% certain it is the same as the old controller, just coloured and ricier.

updated

added confirmation new EL hand controller supported models (all PFC's except for Toyota JZX100 Auto)

awaiting pics from duncan of new EL hand controller

OK, had a chance to have a look. All functions are effectively identical to the normal HC (contrast page is different but has the same purpose).

The firmware is at least a little smarter, my old HC used to come up blank when being used via a PS2 extension cable whereas the EL comes up with "communication error". But all the actual tuning and monitoring functions are the same as the regular HC.

anyway pics are pretty crappy (no interior light in the race car :thanks:)

attached:

serial number

version number screen

start up logo

el contrast control

even so...it is very ricey and I'm not sending it back :down:

post-74-1281783490_thumb.jpg

post-74-1281783513_thumb.jpg

post-74-1281783524_thumb.jpg

post-74-1281783532_thumb.jpg

question...

I have a pfc numbered: pfc rb25 9810-0049

Now i took the car to be tuned,but the tuners software wouldn't recognize the computer,said i would need a hand commander unit for him to tune it.

So i borrowed a mates commander which was off a pfc numbered:ecr33 and what ever numbers i cant remember,which worked fine.

Now im trying to buy my own commander,just brought one numbered: fcc nt9607-0464....BUT it doesn't work,just goes to the apexi screen and stops there,but from everything ive read,this unit should work...???

Could someone please point me in the right direction..

OK, had a chance to have a look. All functions are effectively identical to the normal HC (contrast page is different but has the same purpose).

The firmware is at least a little smarter, my old HC used to come up blank when being used via a PS2 extension cable whereas the EL comes up with "communication error". But all the actual tuning and monitoring functions are the same as the regular HC.

anyway pics are pretty crappy (no interior light in the race car :huh:)

attached:

serial number

version number screen

start up logo

el contrast control

even so...it is very ricey and I'm not sending it back :)

thanks

that looks heaps better

and good to confirm it is in fact FCC4

as this hand controller works on every version of powerfc except toyota Auto which is even bettter

ie ap eng, pro, normal spec and every car

i will add to the PFC FAQ shortly

thanks again

i might get one too, looks a lot better

question...

I have a pfc numbered: pfc rb25 9810-0049

Now i took the car to be tuned,but the tuners software wouldn't recognize the computer,said i would need a hand commander unit for him to tune it.

So i borrowed a mates commander which was off a pfc numbered:ecr33 and what ever numbers i cant remember,which worked fine.

Now im trying to buy my own commander,just brought one numbered: fcc nt9607-0464....BUT it doesn't work,just goes to the apexi screen and stops there,but from everything ive read,this unit should work...???

Could someone please point me in the right direction..

check your serial #

FCC NT should work on PFC RB25 powerfc

A hand controller from ECR33 serial # powerfc should NOT work on RB25 PFC serial # as they are different models

ie

PFC RB25 needs FCC N001 which is FCC NT

PFC ECR33 needs FCC X001 which is FCC2 or FCC3

you can buy the new EL version which will work

tryed the hand controller again,with the same result...

Pulled the cover off my pfc and stick on the chip was: fc rb25-2

So i dont know whats up other than buying the new el model..

very frustrating

if you said you used a mates hand controller and he has PFC ECR33 serial # then yours is labelled wrong

its the only thing that makes sense or its a non-std powerfc or something else is wrong

N001 or FCC NT should work on PFC RB25 XXXXXX

X001 or FCC3 should work on PFC ECR33 XXXXXX

the first two digits of the serial # is the build year

so yours was built in 1998 apparently

Has anyone had this type of problem before?? My 33GTR Powerfc Pro is not linking up with my handcontroller or FC datalogit. My GTR has a normal FC running at the moment so i know the hand controller and datalogit are fine, but the pro wont link up although starts the car and runs, abit rough as its a unknown tune from the prevous owner... When i purchased the pro 3years ago, i hooked it up and everything worked fine, i varified it was the PRO and let it sit ever since... Anyone had a similar issue??

i have a PFC pro have had no such drama's mine was brand new

maybe try a full INIT

Thanks for the reply madaz i cant get into the menu to init it unforuntely its funny it worked fine a few years back now nothing...

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...