Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yokohama ES100 265/35 R18

Dry: 8/10

Wet: 9/10

Overall: 8.5/10

I have found these to be a very good tyre, in the wet they are magic. They can be a little noisey on highway driving but nothing too serious and suprisingly I am getting quite good wear. Have done nearly 30000ks on them now, including a couple of track days and a couple of trips to the drags, and they still have quite a bit of life left in them!

Dunlop DO2G 235/45 R17

Dry: 10

I only run on these at the track days, they came with a set of rims I purchased as designated track set. Can't compare with other semis but these have an unbelievalble amount of grip at the track compared with even good road tyres. Not sure if you would try to use them on your road car cause of wear and they would be damn noisey, but the grip!

Anyone using Nankangs?? Any comments??

im using nankangs, can't really complain much. But then again i haven't really given it around corners or anything, i'd preffer to wait for a track day to do that, or get off my lazy ass and go to kangaroo point or somethin. In a straight line they seem alright, only time i've really lost traction was when they were cold and i did a rev limiter launch, a little peddaling fixed it tho.

But yea, no complaints with them as yet

Would you call Continential Sports Contact II tyres expensive ones?

I got a drive in-drive out quote on a full set of these for the GTR (17"). $1610. So yeah just a tad expensive. But they guy there said they grip like nothing else and they leave Bridgestone Potenza's for dead.

I use Sumitomo HTRZ ii (may have got those letters around the wrong way) on it at the moment, didn't have a great deal to spend and also have way too much camber on the rears that doesn't have any adjustment, so not much point spending big $$$ on tyres when they inners are going to wear out so quickly.

235/45/17 (front, due to the rims on the car cannot fit a bigger tyre, yes i know difference in tyre size can damage the diff) were $198 each fitted & balanced, 255/40/17 (rears) were $298 each fitted & balanced.

Car came over with near bald tyres on it, potenza's on the front and falken zeix on the rear. I agree with you guys in saying the zeix are shitty tyres, could explain why after a drizzle of rain I ended up going over all 3 lanes of albany hwy in multiple directions after turning a corner (and not touching the accelerator, I was driving VERY CAREFULLY)....I wouldn't go with them again after an experience like that.

I'm more than satisfied with the Sumitomo's on it now.

Edited by randominsanity73
  • 2 weeks later...

17x9 wheels

firestone tyres 235/45 sport series.

got em for $130 a tyre

wet grip 7/10 suprised me that they grip and hold pretty well (AWD may have helped here.)

dry grip 8/10

For the price these are way better than nangkang nsf 1 tyres

  • 2 weeks later...

235/45/17. r32. 200rwhp

bridgestone s03.

dry: 9/10

wet: 9/10 saved me once :)

value: 6/10.

kankook k104

dry: 8/10

wet: 8/10

value: 10/10.

got these for 200$ each, the s03's were over 300 so the value for the s03's is lower when compared with the results and cost of the k104's.

kumho supra ecsta (cant remembr the exact model)

will never use these again, they were so crap in both the wet and dry.

Iv used a couple of diferant ones but at the moment im using FEDERAL SS595

and i am very suprised with them.

185 each for 255/40/17 on my 32 gtr.

initial turn-in is abit vague but the harder you push the the better they hold on.

better than bridgstone s02 in my opinion.

in terms of durability they are uneqaled. given a hard time on the old pac the marble up and get really stickey. one thing i noticed is that they dont end up all ski-jumped after a good 2hr session on old pac.

so overall good points:

dont melt

very cheap

very grippy in straight line

" " " in cornering

dont squeel

quite progressive.

excelent value

bad points:

not as sharper turn-in as i would like

has any one used the new dunlop direzza dz01? at 350 each i went the above.

tread needs to be more riged

need to be pushed quite hard to get the best out of them

seem to only like about 34-36 psi (hot) any more or less =not as much grip in cornering.

overall i would highly recomend them. (not for the pussy-cat nervouse driver)

they take some getting used to.

anyone used the new dunlop DZ101 ? :P

G'day all...

I have RE55's and love them to death!!!

I have a question for those in the know....

Yokohama Advan 32R semi's in 205 60 13 ? anyone know a cheap place to buy them? here or overseas????

cheers...

Ben you can get them from from Gordon Leven in Sydney or Stuckeys (I think) in Victoria.

But 205/60/13? what on earth are they for, a mini? Improved Production or Production Car racing? Because if they aren't a required control tyre don't use them, they are more expensive and worse than Re55, Dunlop DZ02G etc.

yes our idea was to get them straight from jp as well, and we were organising that.

Until....since the yoko A032R are no longer being produced and we expect them to be replaced with a better tyre (they sure as hell cant be worse) we decided not to get any until the new tyre is decided on. We have a set and expect them to last the 2 cars into early next year.

We imported our targa tyres (Dunlop DZ02G) from jp and saved a packet.

I had Dunlop FM901's on my big heavy v8 commodore, and as I got more comfortable, I was able to throw it hard around tight s-bends around 80km/hr and they didn't complain one bit!

They aren't a silicone compound, so they wore very nicely... but they did smoke if you got your foot caught on two pedals at once.

Dry: 9/10 (best *i've* used, so I dunno how these scales will work)

Wet: 8/10 (very hard to let go)

Overall: 8.5?

They cost me $230 each (best price in Sydney at the time) for 16x225x60?

Just got myself a set of toyo proxes T1-R.

Damn they are good. At the drags they dont spin (too much) compared to the ziex i used to have. They are excellent in the wet, and i am a much more confident driver with them. They dont squeal like the ziex did

So for the T1-R, id say 9/10 for dry, and 9/10 for wet.

Ziex 326 - 3/10 for dry and 1/10 for wet

Yeah Dunc's I have been scouring the net for the advan 32 R and had a sneeky that they had been out dated.... hmmm

yes I need like 3 or 4 sets of the things! so if you have you contact for getting your dunlops, I'd love to make an inquiry about the price of the 205 60 13.....

$193 from gordo is a right rip!

if only they were a bridgestone control tyre! oh then I would be laughing!!!!

Ditto on the Toyo T1R's, I'm also using 255/40 R17 on my GTR, indeed they do seem to exagerate the HICAS but it's not too annoying, infact it's sometimes quite good to actually feel it rather than thinking the rear end of the car is just possesed. Dry performance is very good, i think if the car is putting out more than 450bhp though it's hard to find anything beyond having pre-warmed slicks on that won't spin up when you plant the loud pedal......especially on the NZ crappy roads!! Wet perfomance is pretty predictable (read good), no nasty moments so far, got all four fitted/aligned for NZD1000 so isn't bad for a performance tyre.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...