Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm running some Bridgestone RE540's on the R32 atm,

Brilliant dry grip - 10+/10

Normal wet weather grip - 7/10

Price 225 x 50 x 16 - $280 (on closeout)

The thing is that they are great on smooth roads, but due the the very stiff sidewalls and ~2 degrees of neg, they tramtrack badly over uneven surfaces and will unsettle the front through uneven roundabouts. I will be going back to a less rigid semi for my next purchase. Probably a Toyo RA1, my fav previous tyre, not quite as much dry grip as the Bridgestones (still far more than a street tyre), but better wet grip and a softer sidewall.

Jamie

Hankook Ventus K104

235/40/17

255/40/17

$860 fitted to R33 gts-t rb30 284 rwkw 947nm (bloody high-flow)

Don't really like them.

Straight line traction not too good, I know, (too much torque)

1st and 2nd forget it, 3rd so-so

Huge difference when hot or cold.

Feel stable at high speeds, good under brakes.

Hang on ok around corners after 4 laps at Oran Park but too much side wall flex.

Feel a little squirmy when hot.

6/10

  • 1 month later...

Nankang NS2 235/45 17's

Dry performance 6/10

Wet performance 3/10

In the dry once they are warm they were pretty good. though after 3-4 laps you could feel the sidewalls etc moving around. i was pretty happy

for them in the dry for what they are.

In the wet is a different story. No grip what so ever, the smallest bit of throttle would spin the rears and corner speeds would see the rear

the squirm then the front and end up in four wheel sliding, which was a quite unpredictable.

Federal 595RS 235/45 17's

Dry performance 8/10

Wet performance 8/10

While i was impressed with the dry performance of the ns2's these are in the different league. Worth 1-2 seconds on the track easy. corner entry

and mid corner grip is fantastic.

Performance in the wet is unbelievable, having grip turning in and around the corner is amazing. around longer radius corners i could feel the sideways moving around with a hot pres around 38-40. but this was at least quite predictable.

have done 2 track days now, one in the wet and done about 800km on them, only signs of wear are the sidewall fingers are all long gone.

  • 2 weeks later...

Unitrac focus2000 on stock 33 gtst rims watever size that is

Dry performance 5/10

Wet performance 0/10.. corners I previously took in the wet at 55-60k an hr in my fwd corolla on $60 mystery tyres cant even be taken at 35k an hour.. if I drive through a puddle at 60k an hour in a straightline I aquaplane while other cars pass me with ease at 70k an hour.

Value?/10 these came new with the car when I bought it so im guessing they were the cheapest tyres around, shows you get what you pay for I guess

Sumitomo HTR ZIII

235/40/18

$285 a corner fitted and balanced

Dry 8/10

Wet 8/10

Very stiff side wall, excellent tread design. Handled really well in the last couple of down poors in Adelaide. More grip when hot, but still good and predictable when cold. No where near as much shoulder wear as previous tyres.

KU36

225/55/16

$161 from option1

Dry Performance 8/10

Wet Performance 8/10

Great Tyre for the price, good comprimise between a track and road tyre and handles the wet well.

Still waiting for the right tyre sizes to be available such as 245/40/18 or 265/35/18 locally in Malaysia. Heard many good reviews in many forums. Still miss my Falken Rt615, anyone tested both to advice which is better?

  • 2 weeks later...
anyone had any experience with......

YOKOHAMA A032R

semi slicks?

Are these similar the...say falken 615's? etc? or a "true" semi slick?

Yeah I had to use them for years because they were our control tyres. They are proper semi slicks but rubbish for the price.

1-3 seconds slower than DZ03 or re55s

no they are too hard if anything, not too soft.

they will be fine if you are happy to go 2 sec slower :P

Just grab some re55s or dz03g to get best performance. Or maybe even yoko a050r.

i need to get new tyres asap, ive looked through this thread but everyone says diffrent things,

what are good tyres for a non turbo r33 gts4?

im thinking maey Federal 595 Rs-R

Edited by sydking
Sumitomo HTR ZIII

235/40/18

$285 a corner fitted and balanced

Dry 8/10

Wet 8/10

Very stiff side wall, excellent tread design. Handled really well in the last couple of down poors in Adelaide. More grip when hot, but still good and predictable when cold. No where near as much shoulder wear as previous tyres.

Definitely a very reasonably priced Assymetrical design out there. I was quite impressed with them also.

TOYO R1R

Dry Performance 9.5/10

Wet Performance 8/10

price for 235/45 R17

is $305 each, which isnt cheap but they do hold on really well and dont make any noise around a corner.

they give you so much more confidence when coming into a corner.

IMO the tyre is the best one you can get for street,

they're a little bit soft, and probably wont last the longest. but even normal city driving you can feel the heat in the rubber when you stop and feel the tyre.

final opinion:

they're not cheap, but well worth the cash if you're after a very high performing tyre.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • HyperGear. Just get a high flow of the stocker. Good, reliable, and should bolt on. Yes it will want things like a retune once done, so you need to factor this in to your spend too.
    • Hi. Iam looking for some "cheaper" bolt on turbo on RB25DET NEO. I do not want "big" power just better reliability than the stock turbo which is "fot now" good but is old and i do not think it has "easy" life. One the Skyline here running some "temu" china Turbo but i dont trust those... Thanks!  
    • Hi guys, Making some space/cleaning up. A whole heap of random OEM R33 GTR parts and other random bits and bobs. I will update this thread as I go. Parts are located in Moorebank NSW 2170. Pickup preferred but will post at buyers expense. Prices are negotiable. If they don’t sell it will go in the bin. Item 1: BOV return pipe. $40 Item 2: RB26 cam gears. $20 Item 3: R33 GTR torque split, oil temp, boost centre gauge. $100 Item 4: RB26 fuel rail x 2. $20 each Item 5: RB26 Recirc valves. $50 Item 6: OEM upper front arms. $20 Item 7: Royal Purple Max Gear 75w-140 1 quart/946 ml x 5. $50 each or 5 for $200. Item 8: OS Giken 80w-250 diff oil 1 litre. $25 Item 9 Eibach springs. ers-11-140-60-0140. $100 https://www.streetfx.com.au/eib140-60-0060-eibach-ers-140mm-length-x-60mm-id-coil-over-spring?_ga_campaignid=22235933977&_ga_adgroupid=180146800292&_ga_keyword=&_ga_device=m&_ga_target=pla-295238231169&_ga_locint=&_ga_locphy=9071723&_ga_matchtype=&_ga_network=g&_ga_device=m&_ga_placement=&_gcl_id=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22235933977&gbraid=0AAAAADPiTbo1xAuvnjIWWYnezivf-BUSY&gclid=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE    
    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
×
×
  • Create New...